As someone involved in one sector of the creative industry, the biggest problem I see impeding its growth - even bigger than funding - is the lack of appreciation for the arts, and how little value the arts and things creative.
I know it’s an unpleasant truth, but...
… until and unless we accept this as a root cause, simply throwing money at the problem is NOT going to advance the creative industry.
It’s not an impossible problem to solve, but neither is this problem solvable in the short term.
Typo - what I meant to say, 2 tweets back: … and how little value the arts and things creative are given, by pretty much all levels of society.
Bottom line, we’ve been conditioned as a society to believe that the arts and things creative are frivolous, a waste of time and resource. Oh, and goes against our increasingly puritanical practice of religion.
There, MORE uncomfortable truths we need to acknowledge.
But I’m not writing this thread to assign blame. Rather, the call that we MUST acknowledge true root causes IF we’re really serious about developing the creative industry.
Why *would* we want to honestly develop our creative industry? Simple: just look at Indonesia & S. Korea
Slight tangent, but here’s another unpopular fact: you CANNOT teach someone how to be creative.
What CAN be done, however, is create an environment where creativity can naturally be nurtured, and more importantly, ALLOWED to nurture.
Today’s Malaysia is NOT such an environment
I probably have an entire blueprint in my head how Malaysia can possibly become a creative power house on a global level.
But I’m not going to spill all the beans here. I will, however, share some things that can be done in the short term.
I’m not saying funding isn’t important, by the way. It is.
In my mind, one thing the government can do in the short term is to make it worthwhile for corporations to invest in the arts, through short-term and long-term sponsorship.
The quickest way is through tax incentives.
Yes, there already are corporations setting up foundations and using these as vehicles to pump money into the arts. But simply not enough, I feel.
The short-term solution? Corporate tax incentives for spending on and sponsorship of the arts.
Similarly, personal income tax deductions for purchasing original Malaysian artworks, sponsoring arts events, etc.
Another method is to legislate that a small percentage of all development projects *must* be devoted to public art. Doesn’t have to be much, 1 or 2% for starters.
These are not original ideas, but things that other countries have done, and continue to do.
As I said, outright government funding isn’t the *only* answer to funding.
A longer term initiative to foster the love for the arts is to make arts and humanities an important component of basic education, from kindy to primary to secondary (or K - 12 as they say in the US).
Hence, I support non-streaming post-PMR, as has been previously suggested
I believe one of the reasons why Malaysians generally are not well-rounded is because of our education systems (we’re only well-rounded in the weight problem department - LOL).
If you’ve followed this thread so far, you’ll notice that a COMPREHENSIVE multi-ministerial effort is required if we’re really serious about properly developing our creative industry to its fullest potential. And not KKMM alone.
Remember what I said earlier about Malaysia not being an environment conducive for creativity to nurture?
We as a society are regressing and embracing the very worst of what conservatism has to offer.
And what has this got to do with creativity, you ask?
My view is that conservatism - in particular religious conservatism - is creativity’s kryptonite. Particularly in a society increasingly conditioned and compelled to be “compliant” to religious conservative dictates.
Iran is a notable exception. And I don’t know why, exactly. But I can say that Iranian filmmakers have creatively crafted their films to work around restrictions, and their international critical success is not because of their government’s conservatism, but despite it.
The more religion is allowed to permeate into the public sphere, and worse, allowed to exert its influence within the public sphere and shape policy, the worse the creative industry will fare in the long run.
In closing, I’d like to ask this question to the Malaysian government:
When it comes to the creative industry is your intention to honestly develop it to its fullest potential on a global scale, OR is your ultimate aim to CONTROL it?
If there’s a silver lining to Saifuddin Abdullah’s #FINASFUBAR it’s the general public’s realization that the FINAS Act is as relevant to the 21st century as a 56K dialup modem is relevant to today's Internet experience.
The act was enacted and gazetted in 1981. For those of you not born yet then, in 1981 there was no Astro and all you had was RTM TV1 & TV2 to entertain you on television.
The act was drafted to facilitate the development of Malaysia’s film industry (let’s not go there)
[Cont.]
So yeah, the act is archaic, to put it mildly. But it’s still an active law.
It defines “film” to include "feature films, short films, short subject films, trailers, documentaries, advertising filmlets and any recording on material of any kind…”
Do watch the video, which I did earlier. A few observations:
1. True, the AJ video focus piece did not cover ALL aspects of Malaysia's handling of COVID-19. But it was a FOCUS piece on the alleged mistreatment of illegal immigrants, not an in-depth COVID-19 in MY documentary
2. About blocking comments - the YouTube posting by AJ initially did allow comments but was closed down AFTER being spammed by thousands of abusive comments. The rebuttal video gives the impression that the comments weren’t allowed from the get-go.
3. Govt’s lack of response from AJ for clarification/comments - the line of reasoning is the same as what some cybertroopers have been stating, that the Govt. was too busy handling COVID-19. Fair enough, but as we had seen there were several unnecessary photo-ops that happened..
50 tahun dahulu pada hari ini satu visi telah dilancarkan. Ianya dipanggil RUKUNEGARA.
Visi ini mengandungi dua bahagian: Matlamat2 dan Prinsip2 utk mencapai Matlamat2 tersebut.
Yang sering disebutkan, dilaungkan, adalah 5 prinsip tersebut. Malangnya yang jarang sekali disebutkan adalah MATLAMAT Rukunegara.
Apakah matlamat2nya?
1. Mencapai perpaduan yang lebih erat dalam kalangan seluruh masyarakat 2. Memelihara cara hidup demokratik 3. Mencipta satu masyarakat yang adil di mana kemakmuran negara akan dapat dinikmati secara adil dan saksama
Dalam kicauan2 saya, seringkali digunakan istilah “fascist” atau “fascism” (dlm B. Inggeris), yakni FASISME .
Tapi apakah sebenarnya fahaman FASISME dan mengapakah istilah ini sering saya kaitkan dgn situasi politik masakini?
[ini adalah benenang]
FASISME adalah fahaman nasionalis esktrim aliran kanan yang berlandaskan sifat autoritarian yg mutlak, yg sentiasa mengungkitkan adanya “musuh” yg harus dilupuskan. Selalunya pihak yg tidak sehaluan dilabel sebagai “Musuh” yg harus ditentang.
Matlamat FASISME adalah menyeragamkan masyarakat, dari segi pemikiran/ideologi, kepercayaan, dan kadang-kala juga dari segi komposisi fizikal (dalam konteks Malaysia, bangsa & agama).
Sesiapa yg tak setuju atau menyokong ideologi ini sering di kategorikan sebagai “musuh"
In 2020 Malaysia, politics is still pretty much about identity. Policy and ideology generally take a back seat. Worse, both don’t get to ride the bus at all, especially during election times.
Identity here being “race”, and increasingly of late, religion.
[This be a thread]
I put “race” in quotes because it really refers to ethnicity, and not race in the scientific sense. I’m referring to 2020 science and not what was regarded as ‘scientific' in the 19th century (which unfortunately some still cling on to as being authoritative).
And so “race”- and religion-based - political parties still have relevance in 2020, because much of the population sees things along “race” and religious lines. And this way of looking at things is not going to go away anytime soon. Primarily because we perpetuate this view.
1. You’ve probably heard the phrase “drink the Kool-Aid” being used on Twitter, in speech, or in writing.
But do you know the meaning of the phrase? And if you do know, do you know how it originated?
This thread will provide both meaning and background...
2. First off, the phrase “drink the Kool-Aid” means an unwavering belief in an idea or information, without challenging its veracity, usually because it came from a reliable source, and/or has a possible benefit from holding on to said belief/idea