1/ India's macro-trade-development puzzle stemming from 2 surprising facts

new paper w/@shoumitro_c: ashoka.edu.in/static/doc_upl…

Puzzle

Post-1991, world's 3rd fastest manufacturing export growth (Fact 1)

despite

Massive under-exports of unskilled labor goods (Fact 2)
2/ Fact 1

India considered inward-oriented economy & premature "deindustrializer: drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rod…

But, for 3 decades, post-1991

Exports a key driver of growth

Not just services but manufacturing exports have grown rapidly (12% annual)

India an east Asian Tiger!
3/ Fact 2

That Indian economy services not manufacturing-based economy well known: pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10…

But *magnitude* of defying comp. advantage striking: missing low-skill exports/production b/w $60-100 bn.

So too is duration. Under-performance several decades old
4/ Under-performance in low-skill mfg. is reflected in smaller gains in global market share compared to high skill sectors

But question arises:

Is India then an under-exporter or over-exporter?
5/ Answering this question requires accounting for size of India & trading partners & market access. Gravity model sheds light

India under-exports in mfg. but not overall in long run

So, over-performance in high-skill has not compensated under-performance in low-skill mfg.
6/ Challenge from India's strange specialization

Skill intensity of manufacturing exports rising and

Services exports (also skill intensive) growth moderating, & gaining global market share at slower pace
7/ The challenge expressed as "Tale of Two Arthur Lewis curves"

India, unlike China, has not taken advantage of Lewis Curve in unskilled mfg.

And Lewis Curve for skilled manufacturing & services is threatening to turn up because based on *scarce* endowment: skilled labour
8/ Policy response for each of these "Lewis Curves"

Reclaim low-skill manufacturing especially in key sectors (clothing and footwear): ashoka.edu.in/static/doc_upl…

And keep expanding supply of skilled labour to maintain momentum of export growth through training & education
9/ India's unique growth model: A Trilogy

1.Growth surge of 1980s well before 1991 reforms (w/ @rodrikdani) : citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/downlo…

2.Dynamism but lagging structural changes (w/ @rohlamba): pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10…

3. Unusual export specialization: this paper w/ @shoumitro_c

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Arvind Subramanian

Arvind Subramanian Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @arvindsubraman

16 Oct
1/ The India-vs.-Bangladesh GDP per capita comparison (post @IMFNews WEO) has sparked anxiety & acrimony

But wrong numbers being compared

NO, on more appropriate metric, India has not been surpassed and, according to IMF, unlikely to be in near future
2/ GDP per capita is an *estimate* for one *indicator* of the average standard of living/welfare in a country

Note the 2 caveats, it is only one indicator, there are many others (eg. human development index)

and even as that indicator, GDP can be measured in many ways
3/ We need to measure "real" GDP in local currency after taking out effects of inflation and

Then, convert all local currency estimates of real GDP into comparable dollars

Many ways of doing this (IMF has 3, World Bank has 4)
Read 8 tweets
15 Oct
1/n Second (& final) piece in @IndianExpress by @shoumitro_c & me where we evaluate the twin prescriptions of India’s inward turn: favouring domestic demand over exports (macro) and raising barriers to encourage domestic production (trade): indianexpress.com/article/opinio…
2/n We argue for more openness in areas of opportunity for India, eg. clothing. A key policy is reducing import tariffs on man-made yarn, a critical input to most dynamic export segment. Chart shows these tariffs for key competitors: India’s doubled recently & highest again Image
3/n our first piece in @IndianExpress where we document inward turn & discuss underlying rationale (“myths”) is here: indianexpress.com/article/opinio…
Read 5 tweets
14 Oct
Excited about first research outputs from @AshokaUniv Center for Economic Policy (ACEP) on India's Exports and Growth

Research paper: ashoka.edu.in/static/doc_upl…

Policy paper: ashoka.edu.in/static/doc_upl…

w/ @shoumitro_c

1/ ImageImage
Focus here is on policy paper.

India's inward turn ("atmanirbharta"):
-favoring domestic demand over exports (macro)
-imposing barriers favoring domestic production (trade)
...is consequential

3 questions

1. Is inward turn strong?
2. Is it warranted?
3. Will it work?

2/
Our @IndianExpress piece today (another tomorrow) covers questions 1 and 2: indianexpress.com/article/opinio…

Is Inward turn strong?

Yes: on trade, tariffs up, standstill on trade agreements, and slew of incentives/subsidies for domestic manufacturing.

3/
Read 14 tweets
1 Jun
Final *central* government revenue numbers for fiscal year 2019-20 for India released on Friday by Controller General of Accounts (CGA). Some confusion on their interpretation. Four take-aways 1/n
1. CGA numbers less reliable gauge of underlying economic activity because center's GST revenues are volatile, reflecting center's policy on sharing them with states. More reliable is a broader measure of *national* taxes: overall GST (center & states) plus all central taxes 2/n
2.Annual growth in this broad measure of taxes was minus 1.6% (nominal) and minus 6.1% (real). Excluding corporate taxes-which saw large rate cuts-growth was 3.2% (nominal) and minus 1.5% (real). *Real* tax growth is one macro-proxy for underlying *real* economic activity 3/n
Read 5 tweets
11 May
1/n My @ProSyn is about the complacency of elites in Europe, US and China and how the current crisis might undermine that. A short thread to explain: project-syndicate.org/commentary/cov…
2/n Europe: The sense that integration cannot be reversed is strong. But Europe is creating a permanent underclass of countries (in South, esp. Italy) that neither shares prosperity of North in good times and is abandoned in calamitous ones
3/n USA. Elites adamantly cling to American exceptionalism. But 4 successive shocks to leadership: imperial overreach (Iraq); rigged economic system (fin'l crisis); dysfunctional politics/polarization; & epic incompetence in covid crisis. Diminishing allure of American "model."
Read 5 tweets
21 Mar
Wanted: Committee to Save the World. Coronavirus pandemic requires a global response especially as threat spreads to poorer countries. But the Kissinger question haunts,"Whom should we call?" 1/n
US leadership has been tragically inadequate to its own crisis; Europe too focused on its own; China’s initial mistakes encumber its leadership role. And with these ruled out, so too are G-7, G-20 etc. 2/n
For obvious reasons--resources, expertise, reach--IMF, World Bank (& regional development banks) & WHO must take leadership where governments cannot; they must coordinate amongst themselves; and they must be guided by developing countries. 3/n
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!