BREAKING: Armed men dressed as security guards claiming to be with the Trump campaign showed up today at the downtown St. Pete early voting location today, according to @VotePinellas Supervisor of Elections Julie Marcus.

@WFLA #BattlegroundFlorida
wfla.com/news/pinellas-…
"The sheriff told me the persons who were dressed in these security uniforms had indicated to sheriff's deputies that they belonged to a licensed security company and they indicated, and this has not been confirmed yet, that they were hired by the Trump campaign," Marcus said.
Marcus, a Republican, is running to keep her seat after being appointed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis in May when longtime supervisor Deborah Clarke retired.

Pinellas Co. Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, also a Republican, is running for re-election as well.
8 On Your Side is awaiting a statement from the Trump campaign.

Marcus said Gualtieri assured her there would be deputies at the early voting location tomorrow, which is located at 501 First Ave. North in St. Petersburg.

@WFLA #BattlegroundFlorida #Sayfie
“The sheriff and I take this very seriously,” Marcus said. “Voter intimidation, deterring voters from voting, impeding a voter’s ability to cast a ballot in this election is unacceptable and will not be tolerated in any way shape, or form."

@WFLA #BattlegroundFlorida #Sayfie
*Just yesterday* I happened to interview Pinellas Sheriff Bob Gualtieri about this exact type of voter intimidation, and his plan to thwart it.

@WFLA #BattlegroundFlorida #Sayfie
wfla.com/election/tampa…
"I just don’t want to get too deep into the specifics because we’re trying to balance it,” Gualtieri told me. “But I’ll say it’s a combination of uniformed personnel who will be in the area and also we’re gonna use some undercover personnel just to monitor the situation.”
Marcus told @WFLAChip: "I've never seen this before in my 17 years as an election administrator. This activity is absolutely prohibited by Florida law. If we see this kind of activity, we will take immediate action. It's important our voters know it's safe to cast a ballot."
Re: their intentions, Marcus tells @WFLAChip: "I don't want to speculate, all I know is that if a voter feels that this is inappropriate, or feels threatened or intimidated, we need to react to that, and that's what we did today."

@WFLA #BattlegroundFlorida #Sayfie
UPDATE: I just received a statement from @thea_mcdonald, Deputy National Press Secretary for the @realDonaldTrump campaign.

"“The Campaign did not hire these individuals nor did the Campaign direct them to go to the voting location.”

@WFLA #BattlegroundFlorida #Sayfie

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Evan Donovan

Evan Donovan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EvanDonovan

30 Jan
The NY Times had 93 questions on Day 1, so we'll start with #94 today, as I may have missed some while doing TV.

94th question, from Sen. @PattyMurray (D-WA):
Can you further clarify the WH counsel's arguments that the subpoenas issued before the impeachment vote were invalid?
@PattyMurray Rep. Lofgren:
House issued rules on January 9, 2019, and the House's standing rules give each committee subpoena power to conduct their business. We have more power after an impeachment has been authorized.
@PattyMurray SOME DRAMA on the Senate floor -- 95th question is from Sen. @RandPaul -- and Chief Justice John Roberts declines to read it.

Question presumably includes outing Whistleblower, as multiple outlets report he tried to do yesterday.

cnn.com/2020/01/29/pol…

foxnews.com/politics/justi…
Read 251 tweets
29 Jan
1st question in Senator Q&A phase of impeachment trial is from the moderate Republicans--Collins reads out Q from herself, Murkowski and Romney.

How should Senate treat evidence if Trump had dual motives both personal and public?

#ImpeachmentTrial #impeachment
Philbin answers:
1) even if Trump's motive was only personal, it's too subjective to be viable for impeachment
2) if he had any mixed motives, it destroys their case, because Senators can't determine how much was personal vs. public motive
2nd question from (D-NY) Chuck Schumer:
Bolton's book is coming out, can the Senate come to a viable conclusion without hearing from him?

Schiff gives a long answer, but his short answer is no.

Also shows videos of WH counsel arguing to hear "all of the facts"
Read 190 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!