Hiremath contends that the Government has issued a notification which was made one year urban service rule compulsory for all students including Management as well as NRI students, who have studied in Private colleges. They have not availed any benefit from Govt, Hiremath.
The one-year compulsory service was neither mentioned in the brochure, nor were the appellants made aware of the pending writ petitions relating to the said issue, Hiremath.
Bench: We will not pass any interim relief without hearing you.
Hiremath speaks of the intent of Karnataka Compulsory Service Training by Candidates Completed Medical Course (KCS) Act, 2012.
Bench: This Act does not make a difference between Govt quota and Management quota. Every candidate has to undergo one year Compulsory service.
As per the Govt notification, Hiremath states that PG Candidates will now be posted as trainees in Urban Areas. They have to be posted as "senior residents".
Bench: What is your grievance? You want PG students to be posted as senior residents?
Bench: We are not agreeing to the submission that this Act will not apply to Management Students. We find no merit in this contention. The Act mentions every candidate which includes ALL candidates.
Bench: What is so special about Management Students that they cannot do service in State for one year? .....They have no come from heaven because they have paid a higher fee. This comes under Articles 41 and 47 - It is the primary duty of State to take care of health etc
Hiremath claims that the one year urban service rule was not mentioned in the brochure nor were the students informed of the Petitions.
Bench replies by saying that ignorance of the law is not an excuse. The KCS Act was there from 2015, Bench.
Bench also makes a mention of the present situation where lack of doctors is an issue especially amid Covid.
Hiremath agrees to this.
Hiremath refers to Supreme Court Judgements which shows the jurisdiction of the State Govt to issue executive orders relating to compulsory service Bonds.
Bench: You are taking us to through Bonds, there is no bond here.
Hiremath: There is a penalty of Rs 15-30 Lakhs i, Milords.
Bench: That is only a penalty.
Hiremath: We have not gotten any benefit from State. We have paid lakhs and crores to do the course. I did not know of comp. service, it was not mentioned in the information bulletin as well.
Bench: Information Bulletin is not an Act. You need to know all acts relating to you
Hiremath: Once you finish your course, you become a professional. Once you are professional, you can practise anywhere under the IMC Act. Because a student has studied in Karnataka, they are forced render one year service in Karnataka.
Bench indulges in a discussion.
Justice Gowda asks State: What is the point of the All India Service Quota if Govt passes a law/notification mandating one year Compulsory service in the State.
Bench: Interpretation of who a candidate is, very important here
Bench: Why did you not challenge it earlier?
Hiremath: In the brochure, it was said that the service rule was applicable only for Govt quota students
Bench: We will not stay a judgement unless it is manifestly arbitrary. You are not the actual Petitioners
Hiremath: There was no occasion for us to file the petition.
Bench: Act was there.
Hiremath: But the Act was stayed. In that case, they should have given us a circular that the Act would be applicable to us(management students) also.
Hiremath submits that initially in the Act, the term "training" was used. This would apply to all students because this would be an expansion of the curriculum. However, the curriculum has already been decided by MCI.
So in 2017, the State made an amendment to the Act, removing the term "training" and added the term "service", Hiremath.
Hiremath: As it mentions the term service, we (management students) should not be forced to do that.
Court asks Advocate General to appear tomorrow and make submissions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
News Broadcasting Standards Authority directs Aaj Tak to air apology on October 27 at 8 PM, in its order on complaint regarding fake tweets telecast relating to actor Sushant Singh Rajput. Fine of one lakh imposed on the channel.
NBSA has also directed other news channels including ABP News, India TV and News 24 to air apologies in relation to sensational and insensitive reporting of Sushant Singh Rajput death.
Faizan Khan was arrested by Delhi Police in the case pertaining to the conspiracy that led to the riots in the capital’s North-East area in February 2020. #DelhiRiots
The specific allegation against Faizan was that he activated the SIM card while working as the authorized Airtel representative at a store called Golden Communication. #DelhiRiots
Mumbai Police registers FIR against the editorial team of Republic TV for allegedly defaming Mumbai Police, trying to cause"disaffection" among members of police force.
On complaint of Police officer Shashikant Pawan, NM Joshi Marg PS has registered case u/s 3(1) Police (Incitement to Disaffection) Act 1922, Sec. 500, 34 IPC against Sagarika Mitra Dy News Editor, Shivani Gupta Anchor/Sr Associate Editor, Shawan Sen &
Niranjan Narayanswamy
The FIR is also against the Editorial staff and Newsroom Incharge for the concerned report getting aired and others.
FIR says accused by airing the concerned report have commited offences amounting to incitement to disaffection among members of the Police Force and defamed it
Assault against YouTuber: Kerala High Court is hearing the anticipatory bail applications preferred by Malayalam Film Industry dubbing artist Bhagyalakshmi and two others, Diya Sana and Sreelakshmi Arackal in a case registered for assaulting YouTuber Vijay P Nair.
The YouTuber had made sexist and offensive remarks against the women. The women rushed to Nair’s office and poured black oil on his face for his vulgar remarks against one of the women and against ‘feminists’ generally. The assault was streamed live on Facebook.
Before leaving, they took his laptop and left.
Their earlier bail plea before a Thiruvanathapuram Sessions Court was rejected by a Court which stated that no one could take the law into their own hands.
Gold Smuggling Case: : Kerala High Court extends interim protection against arrest to suspended Kerala CMO Bureaucrat M. Sivasankar, reserves orders in the case.
Sivasankar approached the Court apprehending arrest in the investigations launched against him by the Customs and ed
Appearing for Sivasankar, Senior Vijayabhanu submitted that the allegations as were made out were vague and were based on likelihoods.
The Customs and ED on the other hand stated that he was not made an accused yet, and granting him anticipatory bail at this stage would hamper the investigations, considering his influence and status.
Delhi Court to shortly begin hearing Delhi Police plea for extension of Umar Khalid's judicial custody in connection with a Delhi riots case under UAPA.