(INTERVIEW) In these last days of my 25-year career in political journalism, I'm grateful I get to close out this time in my life with a lengthy chat with @rustyrockets on the past, present, and—most importantly—the future. The interview drops on Saturday. luminarypodcasts.com/listen/russell…
(PS) For those who aren't Luminary (@hearluminary) subscribers, the site offers a three-month free trial subscription that you can use to hear my chat with Russell and much else. I'll also post YouTube clips of our 70-minute conversation as or when I'm able to do so next week.
(PS2) I began my work in political journalism writing op-eds for The Daily Dartmouth, the nation's oldest college newspaper, in 1995. In the aughts I ran The Nashua Advocate, a political website nominated for a Koufax Award. It got very big (and very quickly) during "Gannongate."
(PS3) In this decade my work came as a columnist for The Huffington Post and then Newsweek (with freelance articles elsewhere); on this Twitter feed—which is now 5+ years old and has had 100+ million retweets; and in the Proof trilogy of Trump foreign policy books (2018 to 2020).
(PS4) My first love for many years has been cultural theory, particularly post-internet cultural theory (with side-interests in the sociology of the internet, journalism about journalism, and reviews of emerging tech and digital art of the sort I did as a columnist at Indiewire).
(PS5) I'm so excited that I got to close out this time in my life by speaking to Russell Brand because it gave me a chance to simultaneously look backward (to how I got here), to the present (Trump and the collapse of conventional journalism), and into the future (metamodernism).
(PS6) To be clear, I'm not going anywhere. I'll be right here post-election—just not covering politics. I have a book coming out on the future of journalism (Citizen Journalist, 2022), plans to continue my columns (focusing on journalism about journalism) and some more surprises.
(PS7) There's a significant (even encompassing) political dimension to my future work—it's just not focused on the 24/7 political news cycle or domestic policy debates. And journalistic prose-writing aside, I hope to have the chance to share my art more widely with everyone, too.
(PS8) One thing I did in the 2010s was try to reconceptualize what poetry is in the digital age, publishing a trilogy—the Metamodern Trilogy—that looks nothing like what we think of as poetry, but I suspect many would find more interesting than conventional lyric-narrative verse.
(PS9) Essentially, my work in theory has been focused on how the internet has transformed how we think, feel, and interact—and can be said to have done so in generative ways if we're mindful of the opportunities (rather than pitfalls) we face in art, journalism, and social media.
(PS10) So I hope you'll listen in on Saturday if you can! I think you'll see in my conversation with Russell—and in this feed, going forward—how my political journalism is of a piece with the work I've been doing for years and will keep doing here and elsewhere for years to come.
(NOTE) I can't say too much on this yet, but I'll say that I believe the Proof trilogy—and this time in my life—will live on in new projects/formats that haven't been announced yet. In other words, I believe you'll be hearing much more about the Proof project in the years ahead.
(NOTE2) I wrote "three-month" free trial subscription but was thinking of something else, sorry (too many subscriptions and subscription offers in my life right now)! Luminary (@hearluminary) offers a one-week trial subscription that allows you to hear Saturday's podcast episode.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I can't locate anything "metamodern" in THE BOYS—if you want metamodern superhero fare, read Matt Fraction's HAWKEYE run, which follows Hawkeye as he does things like attend neighborhood cookouts and fix his home entertainment system—but I guess WIRED can? wired.com/story/amazon-t…
PS/ Oddly, @jkehe identifies GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY and THOR: RAGNAROK—two metamodern films—as postmodern, and THE BOYS, which is hardcore late postmodernism, as "metamodern." I think the problem may be that the review is using a term whose usage the reviewer is unfamiliar with?
PS2/ THE BOYS is conventional flipped-script late-postmodern dialectics—"You mean the supers are the *villains*? But!"—with a hero class that's all anti-hero, and anti-villains (conflicted villains) thrown in for good measure, all of it then clarified by trite corporatist tropes.
(MUSIC) In Milwaukee many years ago Sturgill Simpson asked if I was in the crowd and cited my essays on metamodernism from the stage before singing this song, the sort of experience that'll never be repeated but stands as one of the best moments of my life
(PS) The only thing that approached that was this completely unexpected moment in an interview with one of my favorite artists, Natalie Mering (Weyes Blood)
(PS2) I tell these nice stories because the dark ones are really dark, like a far-right convicted cyberterrorist issuing a fatwa against me on the dark web because he believed (many years ago) metamodernism was a Jewish conspiracy I had personally developed to take over the world
I issued warnings re: these "peace deals" a year ago, based just on my research for Proof of Conspiracy (2019)—not based on me being prescient, omniscient, or in any way special. The warnings were ignored. Now we'll all pay the price—as media lauds Trump for deals made years ago.
A Saudi-Israeli scam is coming soon—a fake normalization deal between nations that secretly made peace before the 2016 election to collaborate to aid Trump. The scam will be Trump's big "October surprise." And media will fall for it—because they wouldn't read Proof of Conspiracy.
Some of you may think, who cares how it happened if it leads to *peace*? As we discuss in the coming Episode 8 of the new PROOF podcast, what's coming is not peace but war. And the cost of that war was illicit pre-election collusion between Trump and the nations in the news now.
(THREAD) One of the questions I get most frequently on this feed—if you can believe it—is about cultural theory. I discuss #metamodernism frequently, and people often ask, "What is it?" I'll do what I can to answer the question here, with links. I hope you'll read on and retweet.
1/ I usually try to avoid answering this question, for many reasons. Here are just a few:
1⃣ Metamodernism has caused people to go crazy.
2⃣ Metamodernism is so new there is little literature on it.
3⃣ Metamodernists are currently in a civil war.
4⃣ Metamodernism can be complex.
2/ Two more:
5⃣ Metamodernism is a "cultural paradigm," so it is such an encompassing term it really can't be adequately discussed in a character-limited social media platform.
6⃣ Metamodernism permanently changes the lives of those who study it, so it must be wielded carefully.
BREAKING NEWS: As Presaged on This Feed Six Weeks Ago, Trump Has Announced a New "October Surprise"—a Scam Saudi-Israeli Normalization Deal That Is Merely the Formalization of the Two Nations' 2016 Agreement to Covertly Offer Illegal Election Assistance to the Trump 2016 Campaign
PS/ How did I know this was happening weeks ago? Because I wrote a book on Trump's dealings with the Saudis and Israelis in 2019 (Proof of Conspiracy). All the other conspirators in the "Red Sea Conspiracy" had already publicly normalized relations with Israel. Only MBS was left.
PS2/ I have consistently called out false claims by Trump's ODNI that Saudi Arabia isn't illegally tampering with the 2020 election—as they did so in 2016 and have more reason to do so now. A scam normalization deal is a gift MBS can give Trump to help aid his reelection in 2020.
BREAKING NEWS: CNN Post-Debate Poll Shows 53% Think Joe Biden Won the Third Presidential Debate; Only 39% Say Trump
MORE/ A staggering 62% of debate-watchers tell CNN that Joe Biden directly answered questions more frequently than Trump did. Only 31% say Trump was more direct—a jawdropping 31-point "doubling up" of Trump for Biden. You usually don't see numbers like this in a post-debate poll.
MORE/ 54% of debate-watchers concluded, after watching the Tennessee debate, that Democrat Joe Biden had "a better plan for solving the country's problems."