How do faculty decide where to publish? Today’s #OAWeek2020 thread features results from our survey of 300+ academics on their publishing decisions (1/n)

#OpenAccessWeek #AcademicChatter
We used a range of methods to explore how factors like age, tenure status, and expectations of other faculty relate to publishing decisions. (2/n)
It turns out, when it comes to where to publish, faculty say they care most about reaching readers — but think their peers value prestige & impact factors. (3/n)
And when it comes promotion and tenure decisions, faculty expect to be judged first and foremost on the number + prestige of their publications. (4/n)
On a more positive note, faculty told us that they truly valued open access! (they just weren't so sure that their peers did too) (5/n)

#OAWeek2020 #openaccessweek2020
So, what can we do to incentivize openness?

This #OpenAccessWeek, speak up about what you value & encourage others to do the same. (6/n)

#OAWeek2020 #AcademicChatter
To find out more, visit scholcommlab.ca/research/rpt-p… or read the full paper at journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Juan Pablo Alperin

Juan Pablo Alperin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @juancommander

23 Oct
Last up in our #OAWeek2020 series on the RPT process: How do tenure guidelines value nontraditional academic outputs, like blog posts or podcasts? (1/n)

#OpenAccessWeek #AcademicChatter Image
To find out, we scoured 860+ RPT documents to see whether they mentioned blog posts, preprints, events & other kinds of scholarly outputs. (2/n) Image
The good news for public scholars: RPT documents in our sample mentioned LOTS of different scholarly outputs (3/n) Image
Read 7 tweets
21 Oct
Today for our #OAWeek2020 series, a touchy subject: the JIF.

In our study of RPT documents, we wanted to know how important this metric is in the review and promotion process. (1/n) Image
To find out, we looked at how often the Journal Impact Factor was mentioned in RPT documents, as well as how it was portrayed. (2/n) Image
It turns out, about ¼ of institutions explicitly mention the JIF in their tenure guidelines… but that number likely underestimates what’s really going on. (3/n)

#OpenAccessWeek #OAWeek2020 #AcademicChatter Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!