(0) I’ve been quiet for a while but that’s because the Web3 space today is in serious #buidl mode and I don’t have much to say. Some preliminary thoughts on gov, #DeFi, and CBDC after the past 2-3 months; as usual if I have more time, it’d be more coherent and shorter.
(1) Only users that contribute to network effect of protocol deserves to be rewarded. The pure value provided by a good service (for non-network-effect biz) is good enough for most users, giving them more value-capture is dilutive to protocol value. Most users don’t deserve shit.
(2) Control is needed to retain flexibility in times of shock / need for intervention. #DeFi apps before maturity are not L1/L2 where decentralization is foundational feature. To quote Bo @ Dragonfly, Web2 apps are trains where adjustments to carts & passengers are constant…
(3) … L1/L2 are like rockets where you have 1 shot to make it right; Apps on-top of L1/L2 feels more like planes: better make sure nothing is wrong before take-off, can land to make big adjustments, and man @ steering wheel still matters a lot.
(4) Standard BoD structure + voting shares + milestone-based incentives practiced via TradFi rather brilliant (after 400+ years of iteration nonetheless). All #DeFi apps can take a page learning from this. Shockingly little experimentation here still.
(5) Teams that “blew their load” via inflation without flexibility for further incentives will face dire competitive pressure when the space scales. 30% share of 10 unit of activity could mean little when 90 units of activity gets added – the 30% share now may not translate.
(6) Price-follow strategy in dex’es ($DODO, $BNT, $COFI) can have multiple pools, 1 of which via $LINK, but others even via discrete market-makers. Eventually, latency + cost of Tx will drop enough to make it viable, and rich strategies will emerge natively as tool to manage risk
(7) CBDC stablecoins will make their way to decentralized L1/L2s likely via structure similar to WBTC and could blow existing stablecoins out of water – afterall, most value convenient and great majority aren’t tax-evading / money-laundering / doing illegal stuff.
(8) #DeFi stack will get built on-top of CBDC rails likely by current FinTech juggernauts. Current #DeFi projs need to think long & hard on how they can play on various rails. Investors need to seriously ponder whether their projs have the chops to straddle multiple rails.
(9) …and to the last point, apps that don’t suffer from such “multi-rail” risk may be the tools & Infra plays – spanning the likes of Chainalysis, Nansen, Graph, Link, Gauntlet, etc – as well as highly technically capable cross-chain aggregators (that are effectively brokers).
(10) …of #DeFi stack that gets built (whether on CBDC or L1L2), a “Wallstreet” API is born – where “Finance Infra as a Service” (FaaS) for real biz emerges. CBDC may move faster for real economy, but I think real cool new stuff will be born crypto-native.
(7.1) - come to think of it, it's almost certainly true that various CBDCs may be "cross-chain" each other initially (and if they do it'd be wrapped on each chain), but they will all be on L1/L2s today, so ecosystem on L1/L2 could be rather vibrant.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maple Leaf Capital

Maple Leaf Capital Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MapleLeafCap

17 Sep
Hot $UNI takes
- Initial reaction is dump $UNI into your favorite token across (long best DEFI coins)
- 2nd reaction is long ETH as alts take-profit + buy to farm $UNI.
- 3rd reaction is ETH based farms likely higher yield given ETH goes to $UNI pool (percent & pickle to name 2)
- 4th reaction WBTC getting love w/ $UNI pool = BTC onchain up = accelerated pull from exchange to ETH, bullish $BTC
- 5th reaction new projs launching could weak book build (like $DHT) but could moon post listing w/ profits from factors above.
- 6th reaction is arbs will be everywhere ($AAVE migration, basis trades, etc) due to fund capital constraints. Free money for those w/ capital
- 7th reaction is gas fee is gonna moon, long L2 tokens + gas token as derivative play. Spare stablecoins will get ridic borrow fees
Read 5 tweets
22 Aug
0 - As popularly requested, this will be a thread about $NXM. The token design of $NXM is one of the most elegant I have seen yet. Enough good work had been done by @krugman25, @Darrenlautf, @BatmanDeFi on bonding curves and core mechanics so I won’t repeat here.
1 - $NXM = equity tranche of an Insurance group; despite the “mutual” tag, given buyers of insurance doesn’t need to own $NXM today, feels more like a typical insurance biz. At capital pool of 160-165k ETH and mkt cap of ~900-950k ETH, $NXM InsureCo trades at 5.5-6.0x PB.
2 - 1st thing most need to realize is that $NXM is in persistent ICO / capital raise mode unless (market cap – 3 mm * px) / capital pool <1 (i.e. not raising money when this InsureCo trades below book), which is also coincidentally when MCR % < 100%.
Read 32 tweets
8 Aug
0 - As per popularly requested & at risk of repetition, here is my framework on $YFI. A lot of good work done by @DefiGod1, @im_manderson, and @learn2yearn already. I will try on a higher-level flesh out what all the hype is all about. If I have higher IQ, it'd be shorter.
1 – At its very core, @AndreCronjeTech built a platform to pool capital (such that fixed cost / tx minimized & rotational speed to highest return opp. maximized) and automatically allocate into protocols to maximize delta-neutral (i.e. non-directional) profits
2 – whatever such yield / profit is higher than outright lending to likes of COMP / AAVE, the premium fundamentally comes from (a) speculative capital supporting token inflation emission on various protocols and (b) speculative capital levering up to chase more gains
Read 30 tweets
1 Aug
0 – As per popularly requested, here’s my preliminary thoughts on the $LEND / $AAVE 2.0 tokeneconomics restructuring, with the #’s based on @The3D_ ‘s proposal at governance.aave.com/t/initial-disc…
1 – In the new token model, $AAVE effectively becomes the “equity tranche” of a co-operative bank, enjoying net interest margin of balance sheet & any add’l fees + taking 1st loss upon default, whereby depositors / capital-providers get to enjoy part of the $AAVE equity issuance.
2 – In this framework, assuming 50% of $AAVE is staked (6.5 mm), then this “bank’s initial book value tops ~200 mm USD, with today ~500 mm as deposits on liability side of the balance sheet + ~100 mm on the asset side as “yield-generating”: aavewatch.now.sh
Read 22 tweets
26 Jul
0 - As I delve beyond the ETH ecosystem as local #DeFi token circulating market caps soared (200-500 mm), $LUNA by @terra_money at ~160 mm USD market cap really stood out to me not only as an interesting VC bet, but also as a solid counter-weight to all the native craze.
1 – One can find their shill deck and write-ups pretty easily (docsend.com/view/9mvr5qq, agora.terra.money/t/analysis-of-…), so I won’t linger on them. This thread is to further lay out my potential case for ~$2-5 USD / token before year-end.
2 – Of the total 1 Bn tokens, only ~400 mm of it is in circulation today, 260 mm of which are sold to VC / institutions, 40 mm genesis liquidity, the rest a combo of founder vest, paid to alliance members, R&D, and community build…
Read 29 tweets
12 Jul
(0) Now that we have AMM, lend/borrow, derivative platforms, and potential L2 scaling solutions emerging, I think it’s about time where we start seeing active / passive management products emerge, where users can benefit from someone else’s alpha without losing custody.
(1) A pooled capital base funded by users, like an asset manager , hedge fund, should be able to make trades using simply the AMM / derivative infrastructure, issue bonds with promised rates backed by asset, and have its equity/NAV floated in AMM.
(2) …whereby the construct dictates that the manager of such a pool cannot siphon capital out, and can only play within the confines of instruments approved by capital providers; or if it’s a very trusted allocator, almost free rein to participate in any tokens native in defi.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!