With almost 2k interviews in the Rust Belt by this morning and still going, we're going to find out how many people are aware of the story.
We didn't ask opinions about them. Simply wanted to know if they've heard about the recent reports.
We didn't ask opinions about them. Simply wanted to know if they've heard about the recent reports.
https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1320283307028918272
More than 1/5 (22.7%) of the 605 voters we interviewed last night in Michigan told us they are NOT "familiar with the revelations" in "recent news reports" surrounding Joe Biden.
FTR, the percentage who are familiar was closer to 65% than 80% w/ those who said they were “unsure”. It’s plausible to think they just don’t want to say “No” and that others who chose “Yes” don’t want to seem uninformed.
But in 2016, it was much higher for reports on Clinton.
But in 2016, it was much higher for reports on Clinton.
UPDATE: In interviews conducted on Sunday, 72.2% in Michigan told us they ARE "familiar with the revelations" in "recent news reports" surrounding Joe Biden.
That's up from the mid 60s, though still lags the 90-plus for Clinton in 2016.
nypost.com/2020/10/24/bid…
That's up from the mid 60s, though still lags the 90-plus for Clinton in 2016.
nypost.com/2020/10/24/bid…
Reading @nypost article via @peterschweizer and @seamusbruner, I remembered @washingtonpost editorial speculating as to why Joe Biden went so soft on China during that trip in '13.
Now, they know about his meetings with Jonathan Li during that trip, and it's a non-story at WaPo.
Now, they know about his meetings with Jonathan Li during that trip, and it's a non-story at WaPo.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
