@SalafisUnveiled@AlShurahbeel A jamāʿ is represented by it's beliefs. If those beliefs are kufr, the jamāʿ is kufr. But the individuals within it cannot be judged kuffār. If they have affirmed the shahada they are regarded as Muslims - even if they claim affiliation to that jamā...
@SalafisUnveiled@AlShurahbeel Every Muslim is, by default, presumed innocent if they manifest kufr by the following excuses:
@SalafisUnveiled@AlShurahbeel These excuses are impediments [manāwiʿ] to making takfīr on that person. The impediments are presumed to be in place for everyone & takfīr can only be made when each of them are "lifted". The only one with the jurisdiction to lift them is an elite jurist [mujtahid]...
@SalafisUnveiled@AlShurahbeel She or he is the only one with the necessary juristic competence to derive a legal judgement [ijtihād] on whether there is a fit between the accused and one of the impediments.
If a takfīr is made, it is still improper for a layman to say "He is a kāfir"...
@SalafisUnveiled@AlShurahbeel Rather he can say, "The ulemaʿ have judged him a kāfir" or the like. However, a layman who's sure of his creed is permitted to say, when he sees it manifest: "This is kufr". Observing an act of kufr is not the same as making takfīr on someone.
Now, to answer your question...
@SalafisUnveiled@AlShurahbeel Salafiyyah/Wahhabism/Khawarij is kufr. Affiliation with them is affiliation with a kāfir organisation, one of the 72 sects that is formally outside of "The Vast Majority" [As-Sawādul ʿAdham]. With the exception of those who are forgiven, this jamā is in the Fire.
Wassalām.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[1-8] ilāh & rabb are inseparable
[9-14]
• MIAW redefined ilāh
• used this to redefine the shahada
• made takfir on anyone who disagreed
[15-19] contradicted the Salaf
[20-21] killed Muslims who opposed him
[22-24] Review
Salafis, it's normal to be upset when your beliefs are challenged. But a bricked-wall defensiveness is a sign that Allah left you misguided. Before reading, please make a duʿa for guidance, from wherever it may be🤲
Sunnis, be generous of character: the truth is on your side.
[1]
The word god [ilāh] is sometimes defined as that which is “worthy of wor-ship”.
Allah is the only one worthy of worship.
Why? Because He is the LORD of all existence. It is His Lordship (creator, sustainer, cause of harm and benefit) that makes Him WORTHY of worship.📖
@MilitantVerbal@SalafisUnveiled@Al_Herawi@PonderingSpiri3@theshishaking O I'm not uncomfortable. Far from it. I've sat here and watched you commit intellectual suicide. I studied Buhuti's quote AT LENGTH last year because MIAW used it & his brother Sheikhul Islam Suleiman gave him a proverbial slap in the face when he exposed him...
@MilitantVerbal@SalafisUnveiled@Al_Herawi@PonderingSpiri3@theshishaking ... by showing both the context & MIAW's ignorance of basic Arabic grammar. Inshallah a thread is coming on this & when it hits I hope it will teach you to have more humility in your speech. "You're twice my level"? Sure. I don't care. I'm an idiot, a fool, a sinner. But..
Now I know you never read this quote directly from the actual book. Because if you had read the full quote in it's wider context of the discussion, and if you knew that Buhuti didn't actually say it but was quoting...
Forgive me brother, but I fail to understand the Salafi distinction between tawassul (e.g. using your good deeds = halal) and istighatha (using a wali/prophet = shirk)...
Salafis say: istighathah or tawassul with the living is halal because they're “alive, hearing & can fulfil your need” but with a dead person it’s shirk because they can’t hear and are motionless...
[THREAD] UNDERSTANDING PAGAN GODS... AND WHY IBN ABDUL WAHHAB DIDN'T UNDERSTAND SHIRK
A polite Salafi brother sent me this hadith (online Salafi edition) as evidence the Jahili Arabs believed in Allah's sole rububiyyah (Creator, Sustainer, etc)
Let's break this down inshallah
1) The mushrikun said Allah had no partner. The Prophet ﷺ then condemns them. Why? Because they also said Allah DOES have a partner but that partner has no mastery over Allah. I.e. there's another being like Allah (co-sharer in His attributes) but Allah is stronger than him.
2) Even so, they still worshipped Him because they believed he shared in Allah's rububiyyah. Remember, an ilah ("god" or "one you worship") in the Al-Lisānul-Arab is the one you believe possesses rububiyyah. If they didn't possess rububiyyah they wouldn't be WORTHY of worship.
Ibn Abdul Wahhab (MIAW) misused verses of the Qur'an to claim that the pagan Arabs believed Allah was the ONLY Lord (creator, sustainer, etc) but they worshipped many gods.
This is kufr as it contradicts the Qur'an.
He used...
... these verses to say that Muslims were identical to the mushrikūn & should likewise be fought & killed. What followed was a religious genocide.
The verses are: 10:18; 10:31 23:84-90; 29:61; 39:38
Salafis use them as weapon to strike believers.
Here's how to strike back...
In this thread I'm going to show you "scriptural Krav Maga": how to DISARM a Salafi - quickly, brutally, but with selfless love.
I'm not doing this to hate. But because Allah gave me salvation and in gratitude I want to protect His religion.
For anyone interested in the endless debates about local moonsighting please read Imam an-Nawawi's commentary on the relevant hadith in Sahih Muslim (translation by my Sheikh's student). It makes clear the necessity for LOCAL moonsighting.
I've been fighting this battle for the 14 years I've been a Muslim & at last some mosques in the UK (where I am) are adopting it. To the naysayers still not convinced after reading the text, pls consider:
1. If we don't pray dhuhr when Saudi do, why begin Ramadan when they do?
2. How did Muslims before mass communication (only really in the last 60 years of our 1400 year history) know which month it was unless they had a local calendar? It's not just for Ramadan. Every civil society needs a calendar (sighting every a month) in order to organise itself.