Job Applications: AOS and AOC open. We are interested in qualified candidates from all areas of philosophy.
Me, after looking at the department page:
Just, at this point in the job cycle, I'd rather these departments be fucking honest about the nature of their "open" AOS and AOC than pretend to some legitimate interest in expanding their course and departmental offerings.
This would save me the trouble of generating more documentation and requesting letters (which we shouldn't fucking do in a goddamned pandemic) for jobs that will take one look at my AOS/AOC and then toss my application.
We KNOW this is what is happening, given the market.
That said, it is probably not wise to say all of this out loud, as I'm on the market, but for FUCKS sake, someone has to say how utterly demoralizing it is for applicants to see an "open" search and then be confronted with the accrued history of marginalization in philosophy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"The end of democracy is a radical end. For it is an end that has not been adequately realized in any county at any time. It is radical because it requires great change in existing social institutions, economic, legal and cultural." (1/n)
"A democratic liberalism that does not recognize these things in thought and action is not awake to its own meaning and to what that meaning demands." (2/n)
John Dewey, "Creative Democracy - The Task Before Us"
So let's be clear about this: for Dewey, every liberal or liberal democratic movement in his lifetime had failed to achieve the ends of Democracy because it failed to recognize that true Democracy, could only be achieved through the radical restructuring of our society. (3/n)
Some thoughts from Harold Finch regarding following the rules:
"I was talking about my rules. I have lived by those rules for so long, believed in them for so long, believed that if you played by the right rules eventually you would win. But I was wrong, wasn't I?" (1/n)
"And now all the people I cared about are dead or will be dead soon enough. And we will be gone without a trace. So now I have to decide. Decide whether to let my friends die, to let hope die, to let the world be ground under your heel all because I played by my rules." (2/n)
"I'm trying to decide. I'm going to kill you. But I need to decide how far I'm willing to go. How many of my own rules I am willing to break... to get it done."
So, what's the point here. Simple: there will come a point when our "rules" will have to change. (3/n)
A lot of the responses that I’m getting from my students about their mid-semester grade reports indicate to me that a lot of them aren’t doing okay but are trying their best.
This also includes the students who are doing well in our classes.
So, maybe we should be a little more compassionate about the amount of work we assign, the kinds of work we assign, and the ways that we structure our pedagogical environments. By “a little more compassionate” I mean way more.
Like... Students shouldn’t have begin their emails with an apology for their struggles, nor should they feel ashamed for reaching out for help, nor should they have to study in an environment where they’ve been taught that this is normal.
I’m just gonna say the quiet part out loud: very few of the COVID responses by higher-ed center disability, either in faculty or students. Any accessibility gains as a result are purely coincidental and dependent on a the benevolence of ableist institutions.
I fully anticipate any accessibility gains during this time to be rolled all the way back once the crisis has passed, regardless of the capacity of institutions to make these accommodations available.
You know who could stop this? Able bodied faculty, staff, and admin.
You know who won’t lift a finger? Those same folks.
Also, professional societies? You just proved that grad students and contingent faculty don’t need to pay for flights and hotels to present at conferences. There’s no reason why you can’t normalize this practice.
Of the thirteen applications that I'm submitting, four are in philosophy. Of the four in philosophy, only one asks for Asian Philosophy.
This time last year, I submitted three times the number of philosophy applications.
Welcome to the pandemic job market.
The only reason I have thirteen applications total is because my research interests (and teaching) are broadly interdisciplinary in ways that allow me to apply for positions beyond the field of philosophy and into some adjacent fields, like STS.
Not everyone has that option.
I don't really have any advice here. I do want to say that things are bad out on the market and hopefully recognition of how bad they are will encourage some compassion and some reconsideration of the torturous process of applying to jobs in academia.
Doing some thinking/writing about the "able-body" as a form of property vis a vis Harris' work in "Whiteness as Property," which can be inherited via the phenomenological mechanisms that Ahmed lays out in "Phenomenology of Whiteness." (1/n)
Which, apparently, requires me to read some Foucault (or secondaries) and his work on institutions in conjunction with the history of the medicalization of disability to present the world as "prepared" for the able body, as ready for its arrival in many important senses. (2/n)
Mark Johnson's recent book actually helps make my argument for me via his deployment of pragmatism (which I do NOT agree with) in the organization of society. I could just use all Johnson here, but that would miss how his view is structured by the above. (3/n)