You could not be more wrong (which is fine) but your lazy attempt to smear people like me as anti-gay misogynists is just sad at this point. "Libs going to brunch" is quite obviously code for affluent detachment from the life and death politics of the marginalized.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1320842503503962112
"Back to bunch" describes for how certain segments of the Democratic party are ready to ignore politics completely once Trump is gone, as he is primarily a personal irritant. If they can just reset the clock to 2013, they will be happy.
People who had problems in 2013 and will continue to have problems after 2020 rightly ridicule this attitude. And brunch is a convenient cultural shorthand because it has always been connected to wealth and gentrification. So when these signs became common, it was a natural link. 
A few days ago, I used this phrase to refer to Mark Hamill, who is neither queer or a woman, but is certainly quite affluent. I didn't say it because I think brunch is gay.
And every time one of these bourgeois kiss-ups deflects valid criticism by falsely labelling it as bigotry, it further hamstrings the cause of actual anti-bigotry.
This kind of disingenuous weaponization of identity in service of the bourgeois is exactly the kind of thing all those anti-idpol vultures feast on.
It makes it more difficult to enact actual policies to address racial justice, identity equality, and egalitarian pluralism when opponents can frame the whole thing as a sham because Twitter bluechecks say you're a bigot for telling Luke Skywalker not to go back to brunch.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
