The BBC would rather stich up important critical voices, by attaching them to the 'far right', and the likes of David Icke, to present simple true/false, good/bad narratives, than find let viewers decide between intelligent commentaries.
WEF's message is backfiring. But here's its essence:
"Power is being taken away from democracy and from national governments, and there's nothing you can do about it. You can either risk your lot at the whims of wild economic forces, or back us, the nice, caring billionaires."
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. He only *looks* like he eats babies, and just stepped off the set of Bad Taste.
He's a deeply caring individual, who has selflessly put the world before his own interests.
Everyone at Davos cares soooo much.
99% of it is just puff. It is fantasy, from people who cannot tell the difference from fantasy and reality, and are forced therefore to project fantasy.
The "strong signal from governments" is not a strong signal from the people governments govern.
"Biodiversity" is the idea which will take power away from people to determine their own governments.
"Biodiversity" is an irrational, mystical and deeply regressive ideology.
"Nature" could quite easily be debated and its role in national and local policymaking contested democratically.... e.g. "do we want this development, or should we keep the land as it is?"
But "biodiversity" makes the parameters of such choices intangible.
The Conservative Environment Network is an anti-democratic front organisation for the European Climate Foundation, which has lobbied politicians behind closed doors, using funds from a small number of billionaire's "philanthropic" foundations.