A lot of Republicans still don't understand why Trump won in '16 and struggle to imagine he could win in 2020. Mainstreamers like @Peggynoonannyc talk of a return to "normal." Their normal killed the GOP. Trump has formed a new party under the GOP banner.
thefederalist.com/2020/10/28/the…
I believe that we are at a turning point in history. The fabric of our society is frayed. Many of our fellow citizens are ignorant, radicalized by public education, and intent on destroying their homeland. We could lurch left and descend into socialism. But, I think something...
...else will happen. I think his new party will reelect @realDonaldTrump and America will make a magnificent resurgence. The global trend toward nationalism (that we saw before COVID) will reignite, too. I think we are at an incredible turning point in history, and it is one...
...that Trump and his movement of liberty-minded Americans made possible, and only Trump's party, adhering unapologetically to the MAGA principles, can lead the country back to prosperity and strength. We have a really tough fight ahead, not just for the next four years, but a...
...generation—our lifetimes, even. But, I believe the momentum is with us. So don't look back to the failed GOP. That's a path to destruction. Understand how the party has changed, and that our new party, if we embrace it, can and will restore America.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Molly McCann

Molly McCann Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @molmccann

22 Oct
This is an article in the WSJ this morning reporting on masks mandates in the airline industry. There are a few takeaways from this, including how important it is to elect a good president. A quick thread, for those of you following the mask policies.

wsj.com/articles/airli…
Resistance to masks on board is growing and the airlines and the flight attendant unions are pushing for a federal rule on masking. Note that if they got a federal rule, non-compliant passengers “could face conviction and fines.” The flight attendants want to *really* crack down.
DOT has refused to issue an emergency rule, and one of the reasons according to its General Counsel is because DOT “also embraces the notion that there should be no more regulations than necessary.” That's a wonderful attitude. We have too much federal regulation in this country.
Read 10 tweets
16 Oct
Great article in the Telegraph arguing against "circuit-break" lockdowns that are being proposed in the UK. @AllisterHeath points are equally pertinent for the U.S. The major difference is that Americans have more defenses against lockdowns.

telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/…
Britain has no written constitution. When Parliament acts, that is constitutional law. Our written constitutions afford us rights we can point to and enforce against our government. Brits are looking at this nightmare: threat of lockdown "at the first sign of any new epidemic."
With respect to lockdowns, our structure of government gives us the power to take back our lives. State legislatures could both end lockdowns, *and* retool the authority of the executives to protect us from future abuse.

thefederalist.com/2020/08/11/gov…
Read 4 tweets
14 Oct
As we move into autumn, talk is growing of returning lockdowns. Europe in particular seems to be rushing toward more punishing confinements for citizens and destruction to their economies. But, there was an interesting and (unintentionally) hopeful piece in the WSJ yesterday…
The article detailed the disputes among epidemiologists on whether further lockdowns will be needed. But the worry among leaders, WSJ reported, is the question, how much more will people put up with? They are worried about the national mood. I wrote about that concept in May...
The national mood is a "very real influence in politics, and many constitutional abuses have never been attempted over the years, not because they were unconstitutional, but because politicians and leaders understood the actions would not be tolerated." thefederalist.com/2020/05/18/how…
Read 6 tweets
13 Oct
From the Suprme Court to voting, the Democrats right now are experiencing the brutal swing of the pendulum on policies and problems they themselves created. Democrats politicized the Court because, as has been noted in the #ACBHearings, the Dems were unable to convince the...
...people to adopt their radical policies, so they used the courts to advance their agendas instead. And they have deliberately attempted to create chaos in the 2020 voting process to open the door to challenge the election and possibly throw it to the Court. They also have...
...been in overdrive to terrify the American people with COVID so that they can use this crisis to expand power and erode the traditional independence of the American people. Now their voters are indeed terrified of going to the polls because of COVID and RBG died right before...
Read 4 tweets
7 Oct
I think everything we have filed in the Flynn case has been good, but today's...

Please take time to read it! It is important, not just to @GenFlynn, but also for every American who believes in "justice for all" and in the longevity of our Republic.

@SidneyPowell1

THREAD
During the hearing on September 29, Sidney revealed she asked the President not to pardon General Flynn. He deserves full exoneration and the American people deserve a functioning justice system. Her point here is critical to the case:
The brief highlights that the attorneys Sullivan tapped to continue the prosecution of Flynn have massive and striking conflicts. This includes the fact that Gleeson’s partner David O’Neil (on Gleeson's amicus brief!) represented Sally Yates!
Read 11 tweets
30 Sep
Trump won the debate last night. Biden did better than expected, although the expectation was he wouldn’t be able to string his sentences together, so... Trump really was laser focused and aggressive, which was great. And he had great facts to hit Biden with.
I’d only tell Trump to dial it back to an 8.5 from a 10. He needs to be aggressive! He was debating both Biden and Wallace last night; the questions were framed for Biden; and the Left and msm tried to spin it all negative, e.g. the question about condemning “white supremacy”...
...Trump immediately said yes, yet they all pretend he dodged the issue. Trump has to get in there and aggressively stand up for himself. We are long past polite, congenial politics. Look at the coup the Left is ignoring. They will do anything to win. The fact that Trump is...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!