Grudem says it’s not about the candidates’ character; it’s about laws and policy.

So ask yourself: if your argument comes down to abortion and nothing else, are you really voting for laws and policies, or are you just voting for character?
By now it should be obvious that voting for nominally pro-life candidates isn’t going to change the laws surrounding abortion: it's been over 40 years at this point, and they've done exactly nothing. So it's a vote for character, at best.
At worst, it's ineffectual virtue-signaling and moral cover for supporting iniquitous policies that deprive the poor of their due and forsake God's image-bearers who come to us for refuge from the political chaos wrought by decades of U.S. policy toward Central America.
Grudem says we should vote for laws and policies over character.

So what's he voting for? What actual laws and policies, in the real world--i.e., not the stuff that nominally pro-life politicians have left unfixed for 40 years, like abortion.
Children orphaned by the U.S. Government as an intended consequence of official U.S. immigration policy.

Iniquitous, barbaric policies toward asylum-seekers, in violation of international law and indeed U.S. law itself. Oh yeah, and Scripture, for those who still care.
Public health policies that present us with a ludicrous false choice between human lives and the stock market—not the real economy, the stock market—and then favor the stock market. Actual policy: stock market over human life. 220,000 dead and counting.
Economic policies which, according to senior White House advisor and all-around wunderkind Jared Kushner, aim to help African Americans “break out of the problems that they’re complaining about,” though “he can’t want them to be successful more than they want to be successful.”
And what else? Setting character aside, what *actual laws and policies*--so, *not* pertaining to abortion--did Grudem vote for?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Coley

Scott Coley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scott_m_coley

25 Oct
Every word that public evangelicals uttered in the 90s about the importance of integrity in leadership now serves as an indictment of their own unfitness to lead.
But more important than the rank hypocrisy of public evangelicals is the matter of how we arrived at a place where, outside of one or two causes that cost us nothing to promote, many Christians don't even pretend to integrate their faith with their politics.
In fact, such is the disarray of the evangelical political conscience, it may be helpful to comment on what integrity means and why it's important.
Read 20 tweets
20 Oct
Because the courts offer the most eligible path to outlawing abortion, and because it takes years for cases to make their way to the Supreme Court, it’s plausible to suppose that abortion isn’t going to be outlawed in the next few years—not before 2030, let’s say.
So, between now and 2030 (at least), regardless of which political leaders we elect and which judges they appoint, abortion will be legal in the United States. (Incidentally, even if Roe v. Wade were overturned—which is objectively unlikely to happen for jurisprudential reasons,
but certainly won’t happen in the next few years—we’d revert to a pre-Roe situation where states decide the legality of abortion within their respective jurisdictions.
Read 24 tweets
19 Oct
Racially discriminatory zoning was outlawed in 1968; and racial discrimination in mortgage lending was outlawed in 1977. But by that time, the cost of real estate was prohibitive for all but high income-earners and those whose families already had access to home equity.
From 1973–80, the value of the average American home increased by 43%. For those who didn’t already own homes, who relinquished more and more of their lifetime income with each month’s rent, spiking real estate prices moved homeownership further from reach.
Decade upon decade of dispossession reverberate in the lives of our brothers and sisters of color, whose parents and grandparents were robbed of the opportunity to amass and transfer what would have been their inheritance:
Read 16 tweets
19 Oct
Self-appointed spokesmen of the white evangelical church have no one to thank but themselves for the fragmentation of our political community. Instead of calling God’s people to do justice, they have been among the most reliable patrons of injustice.
Woke-truthers eagerly observe that we must live with the natural and logical consequences of our sin. They are less eager to acknowledge that people of color have long been living with the natural and logical consequences of sins committed against their fathers and grandfathers.
Good people, this is what the Bible is about. Absent God’s grace made manifest among us, injustice will destroy our civilization from the inside. America doesn’t need law and order. America needs citizens who will put the interest of justice above their own selfish preferences.
Read 13 tweets
14 Oct
It's been suggested that those who promote "wokeness" or "woke theology" should be regarded as false teachers. This claim reflects a kind of theological illiteracy that needs to be exposed. I'll start with a brief note about terminology, since it's a source of much mischief.
Critics of "wokeness" often identify concerns about systemic injustice with Critical Race Theory (CRT). But you needn't endorse CRT-or care anything about CRT, really-in order to be concerned about systemic justice.
CRT is just one among many academic disciplines that deal with questions about systemic justice; and it is hardly the first or the most important. Roughly 2500 years before the inception of CRT, Plato discusses systemic justice in his 'Republic' and 'Laws'.
Read 22 tweets
11 Oct
I don’t presume to know how other Christians ought to vote. It’s complicated and messy. As believers, protecting the vulnerable should be our highest political objective, and there are none more vulnerable than the unborn.
For decades, a pronounced majority of white evangelicals have reliably supported politicians who regard virtually all vulnerable classes except the unborn with utter contempt (and whose policies, at that, have actually done very little to protect the unborn).
Now we are forced to choose between the rights of the most vulnerable and the rights of all but the most vulnerable.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!