I voted today, early, in California. I couldn't use the mail-in ballot because I'd moved between when they sent it and when voting began.
Even so: where I voted, there were no lines. There were extremely helpful volunteers. Everything was clean, safe.
My city, and my state, *wanted* me to vote.
Everything in the experience sent that message. They were trying to make this easy.
If mail was easiest, I could vote by mail. If that didn't work, I could vote in-person. If Tuesday was busy, I could vote early.
Everybody deserves that experience, You shouldn't have to fear sitting four hours in line to vote. You shouldn't have to worry about safety, or being rejected on a technicality, or not being able to make it to pick your kid up from school.
I taped a podcast yesterday with the great @staceyabrams. It'll come out Monday, but one quote from her book that really stuck with me:
"Voter suppression is not just about direct denial; on a deeper level, it is about fostering intimidation, cynicism, and exhaustion to stop people from even trying to vote in the first place."
If when you go to vote, you feel empowered, you feel respected, you feel heard, you're going to want to do it next time, too.
If you end up waiting hours in the sun, only to be rejected or hassled when you reach the front, you won't.
Democracy is such a fragile thing. And it's a terrible injustice that the only way to secure it is for people with the least time and resources to fight through the obstacles placed in front of them and vote anyway.
But that is the only way.
But also: If you live where voting is easy, and you aren't commuting on two buses to work, and rushing to pick up kids from afterschool programs, make sure you vote.
If not for yourself, then on behalf of those who have been turned away, or purged, or disillusioned.
And at this point, don't mail your ballot in. Either vote in person, or drop it off. vox.com/21536156/vote-…
Let's become a country that makes it clear we want people to vote, and where both parties know that the path to power is winning over voters. Democracy is worth fighting for. vox.com/21524807/donal…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“In moments of extraordinary politics, in moments of transition between eras, the struggle is not to save the old regime, and political hardball is not a permanent status. The struggle is to achieve a new equilibrium.”
[Thread]
It's from @GaneshSitaraman’s “The Great Democracy," and I think it's right: We're in a period in which the kind of political system we will have is being decided.
The hardball will ease when one side or the other wins, and the rules become stable again, at least for awhile.
Republicans understand we're in that period, and are becoming more and more explicit about what that means, and what they want. They fear democracy, the rising power of a more diverse, more secular, more liberal generation.
It's tucked into the middle of my Joe Biden wrap, but I want to highlight this interesting research on polarization from @Beyond_Conflict: Yes, we dehumanize, dislike, and disagree with each other. But not as much as we think we do. vox.com/2020/8/21/2138…
The twist of their polarization index is they ask not just how we feel about the other side, but how we think the other side feels about us.
It turns out that there's a huge gulf — we assume our political opponents loathe and dehumanize us much more than they do.
A caveat to this: Sometimes, the cruder, angrier divisions people perceive are a more accurate reflection of our system than mass opinion.
I'd say that's true now, with Trump's presidency. Perceived polarization and division isn't fake, it's just not the whole story.
For all the talk of economic anxiety in 2016, there was an argument that Trump won precisely because the economy was improving and the election wasn't dominated by crises. People wouldn't have taken a flyer on him in riskier times, like 2008.
I think we're seeing that now.
Trump's reliance on electoral distraction is failing because the crises are too big for him to distract people from. And his presidency is failing because he's the last person in the world you want handling a complex, fast-moving crisis that takes a lot of coordination and focus.
To state the obvious, I was against ever taking a flyer on Trump, and I think the results have been predictably catastrophic.
But for all that punditry held he was a reaction to crisis, I don't think he was. People don't want a chaos president when the world is in chaos.
One argument I make in “Why We’re Polarized” is that the alternative to polarization often isn’t agreement, or compromise. It’s suppression.
One way polarization can be healthy is it creates the conditions necessary for needed debates to actually happen.
The same is true on identity politics. The alternative to a politics that takes identity seriously is not national unity, but the suppression of problems and priorities of weaker groups.
As I argue in WWP, identity politics is most powerful when it’s least visible, because that tends to mean one identity group has full control of the agenda.
Americans underestimate the black-white wealth gap by about 80 percent — and are underestimating it by more over time. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
And the reality of wealth gap — not just perceptions of it — is getting worse.
"Between 1983 and 2016, the median Black family saw their wealth drop by more than half after inflation, compared to a 33% increase for the median White household.” ips-dc.org/racial-wealth-…
I use it as the lede of my media piece today, but if you've never read the Atlantic's 1939 "I Married A Jew," it's time to fix that. theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
The author's husband, though lovely, “has the Jewish hypersensitivity toward all criticism of his race.” She tries “to see things from the Nazis’ point of view and to find excuses for the things they do,” only to be met by the “hurt confusion of my husband.”
“Our hottest argument concerns the question whether there exists such a thing as a Jewish problem.”
But on the bright side, “It is only when Ben is surrounded by his family that he lapses into Jewish ways, and then, no doubt, because of his early Jewish training."