A robust and comprehensive new Voting Rights Act would do more to hobble the GOP in the years to come than killing the filibuster or adding DC and PR as states, simply because minority rule is so central to their electoral strategy.
If we were to simply let people vote and let their votes determine who holds power, the Republican Party would experience an implosion that would likely take them a decade or more to recover from.
And yes, SCOTUS is a barrier, and no, statehood, filibuster reform, and voting rights aren't an either-or (either-or-or) proposition. But it's underappreciated how dramatic the effects of simply implementing basic democratic procedures would be to dismantling Republican power.
(While we're at it, we also need federal legislation imposing steep civil penalties for people who reply "we should do both" when someone tweets that "Doing X would do more to advance justice than doing Y or Z.")
And this is all essential to the project in January in the event of a Biden/Dem win. Put forward voting rights legislation, anti-gerrymandering legislation, federal voter registration reform, etc, etc. In both messaging and substance, position the Dems as the party of democracy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angus Johnston

Angus Johnston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @studentactivism

30 Oct
Any idea what "4 Justices (plus1)" is supposed to mean here? I mean, other than "five justices." I feel like there's a secret Trumpworld code thing I'm missing in this tweet.
Before RBG's death, I'd have assumed that if Trump was talking smack about "4 Justices (plus1)," he meant the four liberals and Roberts, but that doesn't work anymore, and no obvious alternate explanation springs to mind. Maybe liberals plus Roberts are the four?
I guess that's it, right? The four justices he assumes will vote against him, plus whichever of the loyal five happens to defect in his nightmare scenario.
Read 5 tweets
28 Oct
I'm seeing some magical thinking about circumstances in which Trump or SCOTUS could steal the election, specifically folks saying that if the Electoral College is close, it's categorically doom for Biden. I think that's a huge oversimplification, and a dangerous one.
SCOTUS was able to rig the election in 2000 because Florida was essentially a coin flip. Give Gore ten thousand more election-night votes, and he'd have been president. Period.
Are there states where we need to worry about even a one or two point Biden lead this time? Yes. But those are specific states where we need to worry for specific reasons.
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
The lead story in Omaha's daily paper right now is Trump's abandoning of thousands of elderly supporters in the cold, without shelter, miles from their cars, after last night's rally. omaha.com/news/local/gov…
Not the kind of news you want to be making in a congressional district that could swing the electoral college six days before voting ends.
Also, fun fact: Omaha is the primary media market for much of western Iowa. Trump won Iowa by nine points last time, and is essentially tied there in polls right now.
Read 5 tweets
27 Oct
If the Dems win the presidency, which they are very likely to do, and win the Senate, which they are very likely to do, then they will have a series of decisions to make. And the GOP has made it absolutely crystal clear yet again tonight what happens if they choose poorly.
All the Dems need to do in 2021 is to embrace and protect democracy. That's it. If they do that, the voters will do the rest. If they fail to do that, the collapse of the system will soon be complete.
There's a lot of people in my mentions saying "what makes you think the Dems will do the right thing?" But I didn't predict that they'll do the right thing. I predicted what will happen if they don't.
Read 6 tweets
25 Oct
Biden high-up signs on to plan to limit SCOTUS justices to 18-year terms. Let's take a look at what that would mean in practice.
The bill provides for SCOTUS appointments in the first and third years of each term, and mandates that the most senior justice on the Court retire when such an appointment creates a 10-justice Court, but mandatory retirements don't apply to justices appointed prior to the Act.
So if Biden wins and Barrett is confirmed, Biden would get a new Justice in 2021, making the Court 6-4 GOP. He'd then get another in 2023, making the Court 6-5 GOP, but only if Breyer stayed alive and didn't retire.
Read 7 tweets
24 Oct
Just stopped in to take a look at the early voting site at West Side High School on 101st and Amsterdam—at 3pm, five hours after the polls open, the line was well over half a mile long.
No line at all for absentee ballot drop-off, though, and the table and drop-off box are outside in the open air. So if you're in NYC and have an absentee ballot, voting that way should be quick, easy, and safe.
BTW, today is the first day of early voting here in New York, and a gorgeous, warm Saturday afternoon. I fully expect the lines to get a lot shorter over the coming week. (Also, far fewer early voting sites than there will be on Election Day.)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!