NOW: EHRC report into Labour and antisemitism
- Culture which “at worst” “could be seen to accept” antisemitism
- Serious failings in leadership
- There WERE unlawful acts of harassment and discriminations
- Culture which “at worst” “could be seen to accept” antisemitism
- Serious failings in leadership
- There WERE unlawful acts of harassment and discriminations
- some complaints not investigated
- evidence of “political interference” in handling AS complaints sometimes based on press interest not consistent criteria
- evidence of “political interference” in handling AS complaints sometimes based on press interest not consistent criteria
- How the Labour Party broke the law twice:
By allowing “agents” to break equality law anti Semitic tropes and suggesting complaints were fake or smears. As these people are acting as agents, Labour is responsible
By allowing “agents” to break equality law anti Semitic tropes and suggesting complaints were fake or smears. As these people are acting as agents, Labour is responsible
How Jeremy Corbyn’s office interfered in the complaints process “throughout” the period investigated not just March-April 2018 when they were sent all cases and this was “not legitimate” and is “indirectly discriminatory”
How Jeremy Corbyn’s office interfered in a high profile complaint about Jeremy Corbyn, advising it be dismissed
Here are the two incidents the EHRC judged unlawful - around Ken Livingstone’s anti Semitic comments on radio and council Pam Bromley’s social media posts
Livingstone
Livingstone
Bromley
In both cases the length of time it took to act
In both cases the length of time it took to act
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
