🚨LATEST ON #EIA2020🚨

Last week, as air pollution in Delhi-NCR rightly took up all our attention, the Modi Govt quietly gave an important update to the Delhi HC about the translations of the #DraftEIA2020 notification in 22 Indian languages. Details 👇 bit.ly/2TBzLCb
In an affidavit, the environment ministry claimed it received translations of #EIA2020 in 22 Indian languages from states, but won’t publish them for public consultation as the translations can't be verified & so could cause “confusion and complications” bit.ly/2TBzLCb
As you may recall, the Delhi HC directed environment ministry on June 30 to translate the #EIA2020 in 22 Indian languages mentioned in the 8th schedule of the constitution. Details 👇 bit.ly/2HGNO6R
Subsequent to the Delhi HC order cited above, even the Karnataka HC told the environment ministry to translate the #EIA2020 in regional languages, including Kannada and consult the public about its proposed provisions. See 👇 bit.ly/3oIIUHI
But the environment ministry appealed against 1 of these orders in the Supreme Court, which also advised the govt to translate the draft #eia2020 in local languages. But it allowed MoEFCC to appeal against Delhi HC order as well. Check out details 👇 bit.ly/2HMxB04
The environment ministry filed its review petition in the Delhi HC against the June 30 order, months after telling the court that it will consult the public on #eia2020 in 22 Indian languages. It was a clear u-turn. Yet another one by the ministry. bit.ly/2TBzLCb
It was in connection with this review petition that the MoEFCC filed its affidavit informing Delhi HC that it has copies of the #DraftEIA2020 in 22 languages but won't release them. bit.ly/2TBzLCb
But what is the environment ministry's explanation for not releasing in public domain the translations of the #DraftEIA2020 in 22 Indian languages & what prompted it to disclose this important information in court? See answers from the affidavit here 👇bit.ly/2TBzLCb

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Akshay Deshmane

Akshay Deshmane Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DeshmaneAkshay

28 Jul
SCOOP: It may be public knowledge that the environment ministry bungled up public consultation for #EIAdraft2020 But when it was questioned about this, the ministry brazenly misled the Karnataka High Court. See highlights in thread, details in the story: bit.ly/3jNJ0eD
Here's the chronology: On 16 July, the Karnataka HC directed the MoEF&CC to ensure “wide publicity” for the #EIAdraft2020 more than two weeks after the Delhi HC directed the ministry to translate the law into India’s 22 local languages. Details here bit.ly/30tHiGj
The translations of the draft notification should be published on the websites of the environment ministries of the Central and state governments as well as the State Pollution Control Boards for wide public consultation, the Delhi HC judgment had said. bit.ly/2YWo4K5
Read 12 tweets
15 Jul
🚨SCOOP🚨
Weeks after its 1k+ emails demanding withdrawal of draft #EIA2020 flooded the MoEF&CC's inboxes-& top Modi Govt officials scrutinised their text-@LetIndBreathe website was abruptly blocked by a govt controlled firm, interviews & documents reveal bit.ly/32pXfQB
.@LetIndBreathe recently claimed that #InternetCensorship is in place in India. This report reveals why such fears are expressed. The collective & its legal counsel @internetfreedom mentioned that websites of 2 more campaign organisations are blocked. bit.ly/32pXfQB
An official of the National Internet Exchange of India, a govt controlled firm that routes internet traffic within India, told me the firm has blocked LetIndia, but he didn't know about others. He didn't explain the reason for blocking. bit.ly/32pXfQB
Read 5 tweets
3 Jul
EXCLUSIVE: The controversial new draft of India's main law for giving environment clearances—which the Modi Govt tried to push during #lockdown without proper public consultation—was designed to be a diluted version. This is how 2 ministers ensured that. bit.ly/31Ebb99
Briefly put: the specific terms of reference and objectives approved by the ministers for an expert committee working on drafting the new law for environment clearances resulted in some controversial provisions added to its draft, official documents show. bit.ly/31Ebb99
The story begins in April 2018 when Dr Harshvardhan, then environment minister, asked his officials to draft a 'structured ToR' or Terms of Reference for the Dr Satish Wate committee, which was looking at all technical aspects of implementation of EIA 2006 bit.ly/31Ebb99
Read 15 tweets
25 Jun
Documents accessed by @HuffPostIndia reveal a blow-by-blow account of how the Modi govt is evading public scrutiny of its actions by using the #coronavirus lockdown to ram through controversial dilutions to one of India's most important environmental laws. bit.ly/2YuIiKt
The story begins on March 23 when the environment ministry first uploaded the draft EIA Notification of 2020 on its website seeking public feedback till May 22. In other words, two days before the country was to go into a #lockdown bit.ly/2YuIiKt
On April 11, the draft notification — thus far available only on the ministry website – was published in the official Gazette of India. bit.ly/2YuIiKt
Read 12 tweets
4 Jun
<Interview> In the #COVIDー19 lockdown, we have slid back to an age where information is disclosed to citizens only on need-to-know basis by govt officials & people’s right to know as a principle is ignored, said RTI activist Venkatesh Nayak of @CHRI_INT bit.ly/2BnFYMb
Context for the statement above: Nayak was responding to questions about the recent legally binding advisory issued by the Central Information Commission to the Modi govt to release data about migrant workers who continue to remain stranded across India. bit.ly/2BnFYMb
This advisory was issued by the CIC in response to Nayak's complaint about being denied information concerning stranded migrant workers across India that he had sought through an RTI application filed in the chief labour commissioner’s office. bit.ly/2BnFYMb
Read 12 tweets
8 Apr
The Modi government has been at pains to emphasise the virtues of PM-CARES over PMNRF in India's battle over #coronavirus, but both funds fail the test of transparency in one important way. See the story and the tweets in this thread for more details: bit.ly/3aNEnMB
The audited reports on the PMNRF website consciously avoid revealing details about who its donors & beneficiaries are, the PM-CARES fund's dedicated page on the PM's official website also does not disclose these details either. bit.ly/3aNEnMB
Why does the PMNRF choose to not reveal its donors & beneficiaries? The answer can be found in what the PMO told the Delhi High Court & the Central Information Commission a few years ago when RTI activist Aseem Takyar was denied these details. See: bit.ly/3aNEnMB
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!