A lot of white people need to be deprogrammed. It felt weird to use that word at first, but I honestly think it’s the right one. Like they’re mostly okay. Then you hit this completely fictional reality written into the firmware and it just causes these glitches.
We need a whole curriculum for this. Maybe it’s like rehab or something. But somebody sits down with @NathanLerner like let’s go through history in detail until you understand some fundamental things you believe just are not true. They never were. Then let’s rebuild your values.
It seems like this person is trying to do good work. They want to enable a more progressive future for everyone. That’s great. Imagine what they could accomplish if they weren’t working with a fundamentally flawed value system. One that won’t allow them to see the work clearly.
I wanna say more about what I mean when I say they can’t see the work clearly. I think Nate understands that we are pushing back against bad people right now. But his comment suggests that he hasn’t accepted that this is part of a deep legacy of villainy.
The people we are battling right now are not unique. Their ideas are not new. The depths of their evil and violence is not an unknown. This has all happened before. In this same way. In this same place. This is history in an unbroken line that we can actually see with our eyes.
Now I’m not saying that everybody should already know this. Learning history is hard. And we know that America is dedicated to not teaching it. We all have to be educated. But the difference between me and Nate is that the education is visited upon my body. I cannot deny it.
My education wasn’t academic. My education is engrained into my heritage. The way white folks came to my grandmas house and threatened us while I was growing up was undeniable. Later all I did was learn what to call it. We lived on sharecropper land, and we didn’t own shit.
I’m given the same rhetoric about America being this great bastion of freedom and democracy. But my body lets me know it is not true. I’m made resistant to the programming. And ever since I realized this, I keep thinking about all the people who have no natural resistance.
I keep thinking about all the people who are given the lie from birth. It’s a first principle for them. Foundational to how their value system is built. Unquestionable. I can only imagine how difficult it is to be deprogrammed from that.
All that said, my original point is different. More subtle and more insidious. A person like Nate is doing his part to build the future of this country. But is he even capable of a vision of the future that is truly just if his perception of the past is so fundamentally broken?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A few weeks, and even a few months, is *not* enough time to recover from serious work-related burnout. Yes you can recover. But in my experience it takes longer. And we all know that being out of work for an extended period is not feasible for most people.
I do want to offer a different perspective though. In my case at least, what I decided was to get a less stressful job. Burnout is one of the main reasons I stepped back from management and went back to an individual contributor role. That was 18 months ago.
I want to fully acknowledge the privilege and good fortune that I have to be able to make that decision. I have strong prospects, my skills as an engineer had not atrophied very much. And in my industry, I didn’t make much less money than I did before. In fact I make more now.
What's funny to me is that they either thought people wouldn't actually do it, or more likely they are confused and dismayed at how much "whole selves" some of us have. I'm reminded of @AnandWrites talking about how limited a lot of these tech leaders actually are.
I wanna try to convey something important. And it's hard because even I get tired of being cynical sometimes. But I think it's important to unpack what's really happening here as these companies admit that they don't care about what happens to you outside of work.
Those who advocate for increased diversity, equity, and inclusion have been pushing this mantra of "bring your whole self to work". We do it because we recognized it was necessary in order to make space for people who aren't white dudes. Our whole selves have never been welcome.
It's important for everybody to understand that last night's debate is a microcosm for how Trump treats everything. "Fuck your rules. I will cover over any disadvantage against me with chaos."
What we are seeing is that this is a tactic that Very Serious White Men are essentially powerless against. Without the ability force people into their preferred frame of "civility" and "decorum", they don't know what to do. They are caught flat-footed.
In the same way that a lot of people who want to increase equity and freedom are finding their voice, a lot of white men who feel differently are finding theirs too.
Erica has a great thread breaking down the particulars of this issue. The short version is Armstrong uses a lot of words to say "don't talk about politics, get back to work".
I've seen people say Armstrong stands for nothing. I'd say this is a strong statement of what he does stand for. It's just not what you wanna hear. A lot of white men have been conditioned that amassing fortunes is both a personality and a morality. Nothing else really matters.
There is a type of white guy who has genuinely convinced themselves that the way they engage is not shitty. Like they come at you sideways, but when you respond negatively they are legit confused about the clapback. No sense of self awareness about how they communicate.
I mean we all can stand a little more self reflection. I'm not judging people for being early in their journey of gaining self-awareness. My issue is when they hit you with "calm discussion" or "let's keep it civil" when they came looking for me on some bullshit from the jump.
It illustrated so directly how they live in a world that is supposed to bend around them. They don't have to take responsibility for how they behave. We are supposed to just absorb it and make it okay by choosing not to get upset. It's trash.
This is a perfect example of why we are stuck in this place. This experiment is seeking to answer a question that misses the point entirely. And it muddies the waters on getting at the real issues. This person probably thinks they're helping.
My interpretation is that this person wants to run an experiment to answer a particular question. “Does twitter’s cropping algorithm discriminate against Black faces in a statistically significant way”. But that question does not get at the real issue.