When Trump won the 2016 US presidential election, American Jews voted 70:30 against him. That didn't stop the then leader of the UK Board of Deputies gushingly congratulating him "on behalf of British Jews". He was roundly criticised by many Jews here for doing so.
Last night the current BoD Pres. praised Trump, saying "he has increased peace in the Middle East". In doing so, she aimed a similar kick at Israeli peace activists who regard the Abraham Accords as based completely on normalising the 53-year long illegal Israeli occupation.
This was "balanced" by a mealy-mouthed statement that "he has not sufficiently disavowed white supremacists"! Trump has emboldened white supremacists called them "fine people" despite them chanting "Jews will not replace us" at Charlotttesville", echoed their conspiracy theories,
about the "great replacement", attacked George Soros, and, labelled refugees, Muslims, Mexicans, LGBT people as a threat to America, and called Black Lives Matter supporters "looters", "lowlife" and "scum". Did she not listen to Trump's words at his rally on 12 October?
Using classic Far-Right conspiracy theory, he said Biden had "handed control to the socialist, the Marxist and left wing extremists", and then added "Biden is also owned by the radical globalists, the wealthy donors, the big money, special interest, who shipped away your jobs,
shut down your factories through open your borders and ravaged our cities while sacrificing American blood and treasure in ridiculous endless wars.” Who does the BoD President imagine he is fingering here? But it also begs some questions for the Labour Party's new leadership
who have placed so much trust in the judgements of the Board of Deputies. Do they agree with the BoD's praise of Trump's Middle East policy (which accords completely with Netanyahu's)? Yes or No? If you don't, might other political assessments by the BoD be open to question too?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tomorrow, @EHRC will release its report its report into whether the Labour Party acted unlawfully against Jewish members. The body that pushed first for this Inquiry are the "Campaign Against Antisemitism" - a body mired in their own controversies re racism
They first called for an Inquiry In November 2018 three months after they had launched a petition: "Jeremy Corbyn is an antisemite and must go". They eventually had to remove the "comments page" of the signatories to that petition, because of what those signatories had added.
There were threats of violence/death threats against Jeremy Corbyn, and crude anti-immigrant/white supremacist abuse eg: “corbyn is a danger to the uk he hates the uk and white men he is skum”, "Jews... are peaceful people unlike the immigrants he wants to flood the country with”
Worrying but curious article in the Independent by Rob Merrick on the current alliances of the Tory Party in Europe, with Johnson's approval, with a range of Far Right/Islamophobic parties. independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
Worrying because what has seemed to have gone under the radar since the beginning of March 2020, when the Pandemic moved fully centre stage, is that the European Conservatives and Reformists Group had invited in a new set of groups which includes
for example AfD in Germany and Salvini's far right Italian party as well as Austria's Freedom Party, founded in the '50s by a former Nazi minister and SS officer. Other additions - the far right Danish Peopel's Party, and the openly racist Conservative People's Party of Estonia.
"If I have not seen the overwhelming majority of institutions adopting the definition by Christmas then I will act." Education Minister Gavin Williamson threatens funding cuts to universities that do not sign up to a deeply flawed, discredited definition/policy on antisemitism.
This old definition was resurrected by a body naming itself the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). It links a vague and wordy definition to a set of examples which are less to do with tackling antisemitism than with shielding Israeli policy from criticism.
Of course universities should have robust and effective policies for dealing with all racism and bigotry including antisemitism, but why the pressure to adopt this policy which has been disowned by Kenneth Stern who originally wrote it for a different body and different purpose?
As a Jewish member of the Labour Party I thank @Keir_Starmer for his New Year message, but his claim that he has "been... establishing new ties right across the Jewish community and its organisations" is simply untrue. jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/sir-keir-starm… via @JewishNewsUK
I wrote to him personally in early April urging him to do so. My letter was ignored for 2.5 months. After reminding him about it I got a brief "one size fits all" form letter from his office staff which answered none of my nine specific questions or requests. I wrote back to say
I see that the Jewish Chronicle editor, Stephen Pollard (who still moonlights for the anti-immigrant Mail, Telegraph and Express) reached a new low with a tweet mocking @jeremycorbyn's pride in his mum being at the Battle of Cable Street, asking "on which side"?
This was his puerile response to the fact that one of Corbyn's brothers (Piers) was mixing with fascists+ other conspiracy theorists eg David Icke, at the anti-maskers/COVID-deniers gathering in London. As one of Corbyn's sons put it "associating with fascists is disgusting..."
He added: "Piers Corbyn speaks for Piers Corbyn and only Piers Corbyn". I didn't see Pollard's tweet till today. He blocked me some time ago. Why? Maybe because I exposed his lavish praise for the Islamophobic, and Enoch Powell admirer, Douglas Murray? Or perhaps,
Observer leads with @Keir_Starmer demanding that PM delivers on promise of all children back at school, no ifs, no buts etc. I'm a retired primary school teacher who taught for 23 years in inner London, (NUT rep for most of those) + I know the unions are right to be worried.
My hardest job as union rep was getting teachers too ill to teach to take time off to recover. In 23 years I never met a teacher who was not committed first and foremost to welfare and safety of children. Shocking that @Keir_Starmer shows little interest in unions H&S concerns.
My union (NEU) of which, though retired, I'm still a branch committee member, has led the way with demands on government for the benefit of children, teachers and their families and has a plan. Their five tests have not been met. @RLong_Bailey backed these, but Starmer does not.