So will the media discuss this, like say "covfefe"
END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

31 Oct
So, I just have a hard time thinking folks who voted for Trump after the Access Hollywood tapes in 2016 would now say they just can't pull the level for Trump in 2020. On the other hand, Trump's leadership & policy has won over a lot of folks who didn't vote for him. /2
2/ And I don't see Biden having any more excitability than Hillary and think Hillary had better GOTV efforts. Trump also is polling better than any other Republican with blacks. So I just don't see how this adds up to Biden winning. That said, nothing would surprise me.
3/ Trump blow-out. Biden blow-out. 2 month election "counting."
Read 5 tweets
20 Oct
Here, I'll help you @HeathMayo
1) Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett
2) 200+ federal judges
3) Tax cut
4) Booming economy, lowest unemployment for everyone pre COVID, highest stock market
5) Stopped travel from China
6) No one died COVID b/c lack of capacity
1/
7/ Therapeutics and vaccines fastest ever
8/ Supports federalism
9/ Embassy to Israel
10/ Recognition of Israel and other peace movements
11/ More money for NATO from allies no money for WHO
12/ Undid damaging EO on gender
13/ Protects religious freedom
14/ Bans racist training
15/ Fired Comey and hired Barr
16/ Survived the coup
...and many more.
Read 4 tweets
28 Sep
Okay, this is hilarious! Peter Strzok's attorney is telling Judge Sullivan that @SidneyPowell1 is violating a court order by filing these additional disclosures. 1/
2/ NOPE! The court order was to not file supplements to "pending motions," which were motions to withdraw and motion for dismissal b/c of prosecutorial misconduct. The government's motion to dismiss was not filed until later! And even Sullivan wouldn't dare say you can't file
3/ relevant evidence to that motion. But what makes it even richer?
Read 7 tweets
28 Sep
THREAD: Tomorrow is hearing on Government's Motion to Dismiss criminal charge against @GenFlynn. I didn't have time to write up a lawsplainer tying in new exculpatory evidence @SidneyPowell1 and DOJ filed, so here's a thread. (Limiting comments until finished). 1/
2/ This @FDRLST provides the lawsplaining of the elements for 1001 charge and why DOJ properly filed motion to dismiss. In short, any "lies" were not material and no lies. thefederalist.com/2020/05/04/you…
3/ Starting with "no lies." Let's first point out that Statement of Offense undisputed and inaccurately stated Flynn lied about discussing sanctions. thefederalist.com/2020/06/01/new…
Read 12 tweets
24 Sep
Holy BEEP! By @seanmdav Yes, they ALL bought INSURANCE paid for 50% by our tax dollars to cover them for misconduct. Let that sink in! thefederalist.com/2020/09/24/tru…
2/ Also remember @JoeBiden was in on that January 5 meeting!
3/ And don't think Comey wasn't in on plot to get rid of Sessions.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!