The Hinduphobia in US media and academia is not limited to the post BJP era, or even to the period of rich Indian immigrants in the tech sector. It is an ancient American tradition rooted in racism and missionary propaganda, going back to the time when India was a British colony.
These narratives in American universities have been running without any counter for several decades now. Until now, Indian Americans have been blissfully ignorant of the nonsense, trying to focus on making money or whatever. But the nonsense will bear fruit and come to bite them.
This misrepresentation of Hinduism and India has nothing to do with the supposed wealth of Indian Americans. After all, India is still a poor country and most Hindus are dirt poor compared to the other religions. No, the narrative is simply a continuation of age old racist crap.
In this regard, Hindus must not treat themselves as separate from other colored races who have all had the dumpster thrown at them by the American media and academia. Hindus must especially see common ground with Native Americans and other disenfranchised pagan societies.
The colonial trick is simply “divide and rule”. It is the same dumb strategy being rehashed for decades, and like idiots, people are still falling for it. So, no! Hindu Americans are not alone in this battle. It is immaterial that the US left dumped them, it was never with them.
The fact is, like Native American tribes, Hindu Americans have no real voice in the US politics. Their money is completely irrelevant. They are just being kicked around from one issue to another, even while the US media and academia are extremely hostile in their Hinduphobia.
May be, at some point, Hindu Americans will see how dumb they are taken to be. There is no point in running either towards the Democrats or to the Republicans regarding their issues. Neither of them gives a shit.
Why should they? They have nothing to lose by not giving a shit.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dumbass English language. Indian languages would have distinguished nouns from adjectives. The sad thing is we are borrowing the names of nationalities from English into Indian languages, instead of even using their own names. Like “French” फ्रेन्च instead of “Français” फ्रानसे.
The correct method is to take the morphological root for a country and construct the words in our own languages. E.g: “Frānsēya” फ्रान्सेय ఫ్రాన్సేయ for French people and “Frānsa” फ़्रान्स ఫ్రాన్స as an adjective for French products. Similar to “Ānglēya” and “Āngla” for England.
Such grammatical niceties are non-existent in the barbaric language with the barbaric spelling (forget about the grammar altogether) that is lording over our country now. 😒
Because obviously, there is a desperate need in India for hospital management staff, and managers in small and medium scale companies (MSME, in a less pretentious lingo) who all speak English and would not understand the same damn thing in local languages? #Colonialism 2.0?
Now you wonder why parents want to send their kids to English medium schools? Because the kids would not be able to get a job in hospital management or even a small/medium scale company if they are unable to brainwash their entire brain into English. That is future by design.
In the second part of the essay, I describe how a Dharmic ethical framework provides Dharmic alternatives for the notions of causality, legal regulation and individual rights, that are being proposed for driving the behavior of AI in a responsible manner.
Not many people understand how deeply Christian are the ethical notions of causality, legal regulation, or individual rights. In our current secular world, the Christian roots of these ideas are obscured.
A Dharmic ethical framework for AI need not align by these ideas.
In this part of the essay, I can see that my effort to write the original in Telugu paid off. What I suggested as an alternative to legal regulation: Āryabhāshāsaṃvṛddhi ఆర్యభాషాసంవృద్ధి is very hard to translate into English, and wouldn’t have appeared if thinking in English.
The Iranian word “Kuruš”, which is written as Cyrus and pronounced incorrectly as “sairas”, is related to the Sanskrit “Kuru” - the very family which is immortalized in the Mahābhārata epic.
My opinion is that the word “kuruš” is also at the root of the word “Kurd” - the tribe speaking an Iranic language and living also in Turkey and Iraq. The word “kuruš” is most likely related in meaning to Sanskrit “karša” कर्ष meaning “farming”. These were farming civilizations.
Calling themselves “farming people” is a very common endonym of various nations. Another example is “Poland” (literally, the country of “field people”). This is a simple way to contrast themselves, especially if they are surrounded by nomadic tribes relying on hunting-gathering.
Before Indians warm up to cuddling with the extreme right in France, they should know the kind of literature beloved by these parties and how Indians are portrayed in them.
See “Le Camp des Saints” (The camp of the saints) by Jean Raspail.
I mean, sure, support France by all means. The consensus on showing the finger to the Islamists is pretty much unanimous across all political stripes in France. Why then throw your towel with Mme. Le Pen, of all people!?
The battle in France for “Laïcité” (secular rationalism) is a very different situation when compared with India. India is not “secular” despite the bogus framing in the constitution. The French Laïcité has an ancient history, going back to the fight against the catholic monarchy.
Interesting theory about why we are accumulating so much crap in this modern age.
May be, we should start redesigning our economy to move the largest volume of trade to be on perishable goods (food, services etc.) instead of making everything artificially perishable?
If we look at this from the other side, if the consumers have a reliable set of durable goods (whether furniture, electronics or vehicles), I think they will invest more and more of their income on perishables: higher quality food, better and consumer friendlier service etc..
With electronics, the current trend of cloud computing makes every device endlessly updatable anyways. The marginal value of buying the most recent smartphone with a slightly better screen or camera is not that exciting as modularity and mix-and-match that let us keep our stuff.