dikgaj Profile picture
31 Oct, 11 tweets, 2 min read
1) Ishaq writes on 7th c jihadi murder of poet & mom Asma accused of "blasphemy": "That was the first day Islam became powerful among B. Khatma; before that Muslims hid the fact. The day after she was killed the men of B. Khatma became Muslims because they saw the power of Islam"
2) Ishaq's story is consistently sought to be dismissed by Islamists as "weak" - one can see why: it openly acknowledges the mindset of the first Islamists and their acknowledgment that the conversions were by terror, at a level of sadism that wd numb and shock the target popn.
3)But Ishaq's story shd also make sense in the current debates over France beheadings: the violent agitation ag France is the same tactic as by Asma's Muslim assassin who taunted the children of his victim over their mothers corpse.
4)The psychology of terror is exactly the same: the jihadi is saying they will kill whoever they deem useful to demonstrate their power and made an example of, and whoever protests this will be subject to killings. It flourishes where the terrorist's support doesnt pay the price.
5)Muslims agitating now are following the example of the subhuman assassin Umayr who pulled Asma's suckling baby from her breast and ran the knife through her heart: they are following up on Paty's beheading by the threat of further violence to gag the protest against it.
6)If they can pull this threat off and get away with it, they believe they can repeat the first Islamist's success in Yathrib through the terror campaign as attested to in Ishaq. Then they succeeded because no state operated in those oases and made mincemeat out of the scum.
7) terror of Islamist kind succeeds only when each terror act does not diminish the supporting structure, by number, by institution, by ideological leadership. Instead excuses are found to protect them so they can quietly grow their strength for the next larger scale assertion.
8) the first psychological barrier that protects jihadis is our reluctance to accept that jihadis r no longer humans as we understand them: they have lost the basic terms of engagement that we can try to use to bring around ppl gone out of line. They only understand sadistic pain
9) the only thing that will stop jihadis is immediate visible, tangible reduction in strength for every attempt at assertion - by numbers, institutions, organizations. And making them face the same or more pain than they inflict on others.
10) Samuel Paty's beheader got it light: he was shot. He shd hv been made to face the same method he applied on Paty. Perhaps very slowly. They understand and rely on shock and awe. To deal with them you need to make examples out of them with greater shock and awe.
11) only when jihadis know there is an open season on them, that they can be ruthlessly hunted and finished off wherever they are found with all the methods of dispatching people that they have practised on their victims - will they stop.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with dikgaj

dikgaj Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dikgaj

30 Oct
1) The central issue in Samuel Paty's beheading is the demand by a section of Muslims for non-Muslims to accept claimed Muslim right to physically torture and liquidate the person whose words or creations are deemed offensive by Muslims. If we don't deal with this, we will fail.
2) Islamist practice of seeking to physically liquidate critical voices, especially "poets" of both gender who were deemed critical of Islam or its founder, is attested to from the earliest Islamic narratives. How Islamist commentators have dealt with these stories reveal a lot.
3) There are many cases, like Kaab of Yathrib (renamed as Medina to bury non-Islamic place name as in Islamist "conquests")- but we look at Asma bint Marwan, also of Yathrib - as she was a "mixed race" female poet who throws Islamist apologists in a tizzy from Bukhari's times.
Read 23 tweets
20 Oct
Darmanin calls "Collective against Islamophobia in France" as "enemy of the state": even without the drama, it supports our contention that "Islamophobia" activism actually encourages jihad & the Islamist demand for gagging all criticism.
bbc.com/news/world-eur…
All that the construction and activism on "Islamophobia" has done is to normatize the very aspects of Islamism that endangers non-Muslim societies: violent imposition of their values on others by throwing a blanket protection and justification of everything in Islam.
"Islmophobia" literature and activism among non-Muslims seek to paralyze societal and state counter-reaction to Islamist demands, while on the other hand it provides the arguments and claims with which Islamist organizations can expand and protect Islamist demands on non-Muslims.
Read 5 tweets
19 Oct
Daddy who hyperventilated as a typical jihadi throat-slitter fatwaist cd only hv heard of class from his darling daughter who stayed back to report even when Samuel offered Muslim students to leave. A girl so aware cdnt just be a mis-groomed minor.
bbc.com/news/world-eur…
To the credit of French media, they didnt shut their mouth after shouting that the slitter subhuman was "born in Moscow", but like "iti gaja" cleary say "he was of Chechen origin". The palpable unease at saying "Chechen" is understandable.
Chechen jihadis used to be portrayed as "freedom fighters" ag evil Russia - their religious sadism or drive was carefully wrapped up just as Kosovan Liberation Army's Islamist roots were covered up by the Clinton-NATO axis: after all both wr killing hated orthodox lesser whites.
Read 5 tweets
17 Oct
That difference will only appear on a superficial reading of both. Both had one key weakness - they didnt erase the military of a key faction of the enemy when they had the opportunity do so. KDR has inscription boasting that he helped protect/re-establish "Yavana" kingdom.
This was in reference to a particular campaign among Deccani Muslim warlords. He could have wiped off the forces, having seiged and broken castle defenses even when his enemies had artillery apparently. This wd hv delayed the Muslim retaliation against his handpicked Rama Raya.
But he restored the Muslim rule. Prithviraja did the same when Ghori scoundrel was fleeing back after Lat's gave his smelly jihadis a sound licking. For both, overstretching lines of logistics, internal rivals/dissensions, etc cd hv been factors.
Read 4 tweets
17 Oct
At the moment, politics and governance has been reduced to the fine art of gaming the exact point when individual fear of death just about getting overwhelmed by collective anger at the blanket constraints. I sense the fear is beginning to get thin.
following up on private debates with friends, colleagues, I see no reason to deviate frm my summer position that 1) this is not a flu, neither shd it be deemed a bubonic plague - so no need to go extremes like headless chickens 2) vaccines will take time and not 3 month miracles
3) 2nd wave in autumn was likely (my mid-summer projection) 4) economic needs will trump most of health-expert demands 5) best is to follow a cooler head middle-of-the-road policy on all fronts - lets be careful but not set-fire-to-forest to kill scattered bug-stricken trees.
Read 8 tweets
15 Oct
Rahul should then have included India in his list. INC claimed to be the only representative leader of India when they divided it allowing Partition jihad - transcoding it all as the birth pangs of a feminized nation with none being responsible. But his world history is bonkers.
For Pakistan, the "dominant powers" are not using its own internal divisions - they are using its jihadi foundations of society and state against neighbouring states. The blood& tears of Pak's ppl are internally created by its mullah rule that infests it like a persistent plague.
The history of every country in that list is far more complicated than the existence of a "single leadership" who "divided" the country. Most of their modern versions are results of repeated colonial, invasive surgeries with fractured cultures. Only Vietnam succeeded to an extent
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!