Is Stonewall's Diversity Champions scheme fit for purpose? This article highlights what has gone so badly, and sadly, wrong. The issues raised are at the heart of the case being brought by @BluskyeAllison against @stonewalluk. We support Allison in her fight for justice. /1
Diversity Champions scheme was designed to help organisations become better workplaces for all. Its original purpose has completely changed. Tragically, it is now used to promote @stonewalluk's incorrect interpretation of the Equality Act. /2
In replacing sex with "gender" Stonewall seeks to remove sex protected spaces. And in promoting their narrow world view revolving around "gender identity", they undermine LGB rights & call any disagreement with their strict orthodoxy "transphobic". /3
Vast sums of money from public funds are being spent on what is essentially indoctrination. This government has pledged to encourage a plurality of views. Stonewall has consistently refused to listen to any alternative points of view – advising that there can be “no debate”. /4
It is surely time for the government to stop funding one extremist point of view and to engage with LGB and women’s groups that encourage open fact-based dialogue. /5
We call on governments in Scotland, Wales and at Westminster to ask Stonewall questions. How can any government work with a lobby group whose views may not be challenged? /6
It is sad to see a once great organisation fighting for credibility and respect. It may not be too late for Stonewall. All that needs to happen is a recognition that the current direction is regressive and damaging. /7
Stonewall had a glorious history until 2015, fighting for LGB rights. We encourage all those who are still welcome at Stonewall to push for some serious soul searching. #SexNotGender#FactsMatter /8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We oppose the “affirmative” approach to gender dysphoria. Our detractors suggest, offensively and quite ludicrously, that this reflects an uncaring attitude to those concerned. This important article suggests the opposite./1of6 quillette.com/2020/11/01/jac…
“Advocates of ‘affirmative care’ naturally downplay the risks arising from inappropriate transitions. (Turban himself has described them as largely ‘cosmetic.’ Yet we are seeing increasing numbers of patients who feel deeply traumatized by inappropriate transitions.”/2of6
“They suffer from irreversible physical changes, including alterations to their genitals and sexual function, sterility, painful vaginal atrophy, chest/breast alteration and scarring, deepening of the voice”,/3of6
What is advertised as “diversity” & “inclusiveness” is a set of beliefs based on gender identity theory. The resulting policies undermine the rights of LGB people, women & girls and flout the Equality Act. Why are govt agencies paying into this programme? telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/10/3…
“Roughly 250 Government departments and public bodies, including police forces, local councils and NHS trusts, pay thousands each year to be members of the programme run by Stonewall.”
“The amount that each organisation pays is shrouded in secrecy, but the base rate is £2,500 and can vary depending on the size of the organisation, suggesting that the taxpayer is footing a bill of at least £600,000.”
Open letter from LGB Alliance to Tim Davie, Director General, BBC
30 Oct 2020 /1of27
Dear Tim Davie,
The BBC is one of the great British institutions, treasured by the public and revered across the world. It is because the BBC remains so important that every word you utter is dissected forensically. /2of27
In addition, the fact that you depend on the licence fee makes it even more important that you represent the population in a balanced and well-informed way. /3of27
1 DAME JENNI MURRAY: How I was cancelled by the BBC I adore... mol.im/a/8799931 via @MailOnline. So many questions here for the new DG BBC - Tim Davie. First why did @whjm earn £100K for "delivering a hugely popular daily programme, once described as a ...
2 'listed building of broadcasting' while a Radio 2 DJ spinning discs earns £475K, and others in excess of £1m? Second, where did impartiality go? As soon as DJM acknowledged the difference between sex & gender, @BBC shut her down. "I was roundly ticked off publicly....
3 and informed that I would not be allowed to chair any discussions on the trans question or the proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act. I had lots of emails & tweets asking why I had not been involved in this debate, as it was so important to Woman's Hour listeners....
We have stopped referring to “trans rights activists”, calling them instead “gender identity extremists”, because their aggressive tactics have nothing to do with trans rights. This terrible news story makes that point only too well./1of5 spectator.us/terf-hunters-c…
Gender identity extremists, throughout the Western world and even in Pakistan, rage and shake their fists at the fictional monster they have created from the reasonable, compassionate words of @jk_rowling./2of5
Meanwhile, trans people are being viciously murdered. Not in the UK, where trans rights are respected, but in Pakistan, where 69 trans people were murdered in a single province in the past five years./3of5
We are delighted by reports “gender” self-ID will not become law in the UK. If confirmed, this will be an example of the govt listening to years of thoughtful grassroots campaigning, especially by the UK’s intrepid women’s groups./1of9
LGB Alliance joined this campaign a year ago, driven by concern that the increasing replacement of the word “sex” by “gender” was undermining our rights as LGB people, based on our sexual orientation: a protected characteristic under the Equality Act./2of9