The difference between 🇨🇦 and the 🇺🇸 in terms of libel is something every Canadians should know.

In 🇺🇸, defendants are considered innocent until proven otherwise.

In 🇨🇦, the defendant is basically lying until proven otherwise.

Now this is *super* important.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ You're thinking, if you're going to say something, it should be true. Correct.

However, you need to be able to prove it in court *legally.*

Money disappeared, and the person in charge of it has the exact amount in their pocket? May not be enough evidence.
3/ This slants what issues get covered, and challenged in Canada. A media company, and some journalists, will not touch certain people and companies because they have deep pockets.

Yes, you will be reimbursed if you win. You still need to front the funds for defense.
4/ Now think of this way. Are you going to publish an article with a value of $500-$5000, which may mean you need $2 million in legal funds to defend?

Probably not. You're a journalist that makes $40k-100k. You don't have the risk tolerance, so you avoid it.
5/ This makes Canada a great place to be a reckless business person with deep pockets.

Even if it's pretty obvious what you're doing that's horrible, the media is unlikely to take that risk. Even journalists at large outlets have told me they need to avoid certain people.

Fin.
TL;DR Canada's libel laws are written to benefit the wealthiest, while US laws were written because rich people still needed to attack wealthier people.
Also, an important note. Even if you win, you need to collect the money. Good luck with that.

Last I heard, @BenRabidoux still hadn't collected the small fortune he spent defending his statements.

macleans.ca/economy/busine…
Bonus fun fact: Trump originally wanted to make US libel laws more like Canada, so he could sue journalists that critiqued him.

When Donald Trump wants your laws to protect him from scandals, you know your laws are screwed up.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Punwasi

Stephen Punwasi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StephenPunwasi

4 Nov
Okay, do y'all know what "Home Children" are? 🙋‍♂️

I'm a 🇨🇦 history nerd, and literally had no idea what this was until this morning.

It turns out it's a weird and twisted part of history, 🇨🇦 plays an active role in hiding.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ Basically if you were an orphan in the UK or commonwealth, you were rounded up and used as a slave.

This also happened to poor families that were tricked into giving up their kids "temporarily" into better care, only to come back and find out their kids were gone.
3/ Eventually there was too many kids, so they decided they would export them.

"Parents" in countries like Canada would go to homes, pay an "adoption fee," and get kids under indentured contracts.
Read 10 tweets
3 Nov
Who wants a quick thread on money laundering with cars? 🙋‍♂️

You might have noticed 🇨🇦 cities known for money laundering also have a large number of luxury vehicles.

Recently they discovered part of this has to do with the cars being used to launder.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ It's stupid easy. You buy a car with a bag of cash, then sell the car back to the dealership a year later.

Dealerships aren't equipped to determine how you got the money. They don't have the resources or training.
3/ You could be a dad who saved $100/week to buy the car of your dream, or a guy that just chopped someone up with a cleaver for $250k. They have no clue.

The money goes into the dealership's account, where it's processed as legit business, and you drive away with a super car.
Read 8 tweets
20 Oct
Fun fact: Car engines were originally designed to work with ethanol. That way farmers could make fuel.

Ethanol couldn’t be patented though, so they wanted to use gasoline.

Engines knocked with gasoline, so they had to add something to it. That would be ethanol.

Quick 🧵👇
2/ DuPont hated ethanol though, because since it was easy to produce.

So when an engineer named Thomas Midgley Jr. at General Motors came up with a solution - tetraethyl lead TEL, everyone jumped for joy.

Except TEL was a known poison at the time.
3/ DuPont even said it was “very poisonous if absorbed through the skin” in the early 1920s. They went ahead with it anyway.

The first gas station with this fuel opened in February 1923. Midgley Jr., the inventor couldn’t attend the opening though.
Read 6 tweets
19 Oct
Canadians perpetuate the idea Mounties are just friendly good guys in red suits from up north...

... Like they’re the Santa Claus of policing.

In reality, it’s an insane and insulting portrayal.

Here’s 3 things the RCMP is historically known for.

<thread> 👇
2/ The RCMP was founded as the NWMP in 1873, to ensure white Canadians could move West with “minimal” blood shed.

They originally enforced an apartheid-like system. They were to arrest First Nations people that didn’t stay on land designated by 🇨🇦.
3/ That brings us to our first stop, the pass system. By 1885, RCMP’s “Indian agents” would require First Nations to have documents stating they could leave the reserve.

No papers? You were arrested. Reserves were essentially turned into open air prisons.
Read 11 tweets
19 Oct
"Slashed in the face, beaten with a beer bottle, cuts up and down his arms, and cigarette burns."

No need to investigate, this was "heart failure."

Here's a quick thread on how a pathologist helped shape how I view investment data.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ A while ago I made friends with a pathologist in a coroner's office, and he sent me down an interesting hole.

See, death statistics are reported differently in every country. Obviously.

However, I didn't understand how big an impact this has on data.
3/ He explained some countries lump it in with municipal funding. That means autopsy budgets compete with snow removal budgets. Underfunding can increase mistakes in cause of deaths.

Some countries allow the funeral home to determine death. Problematic for complicated deaths.
Read 11 tweets
17 Oct
Pretty sure most people that live in cities seeing condo towers don't know they have a lifespan.

After 40-50 years, the cost of maintenance becomes too burdensome, and the whole thing needs to be sold to be demolished and re-developed.
2/Okay, I feel like I need to unpack this, because people are getting defensive. After 40-50 years, buildings require lots of repairs. The board then hits the insurance company to cover them, and your maintenance fees rise.

Except this isn't a one off issue in Canada right now.
3/ One city that had a MASSIve building boom was Vancouver in the late 80s and 90s. That's about 40-50 years ago.

Guess what happened last year? Insurance companies said screw it, we don't want to be in the residential building insurance game.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!