From previous reporting on the case: male offender in male prison w a female name.

Halfway through the day judge tells prosecutor must call the sex offender "she". Image
The case was *about* breaching a sexual harms prevention order by using fake names to evade detection and confuse victims Image
The sex offender has since changed his name back to Brandon but is said to be awaiting an appointment with the gender identity clinic.

The defendant, on trial for using false names entered pleas under different names .... Image
Although now going by Brandon the defense now calls Walker "she". Image
The court (under the instruction of the Equal Treatment Bench Book) is enabling the very behaviour the defendant uses to persue victims for sexual harms.
Valiant reporting by @Katie_Cronin . Local press remains important!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

1 Nov
The examples in the statutory code are v. odd.

They are coy about crucial bits of info

Like here. Was it a women's health spa? In which case yes it is legitimate to exclude members of the opposite sex

If it was a mixed sex spa why does the example only ref women complaining?
And this one - a female who has no surgery or medication but passes for male (is the EHRC on drugs?)

But it's a non threatening example.

Why no make it about a male who has no surgery and lives "as a woman"

Would be covered by S7. But should they be in the female spa??
And this one. A clothing store has a women's changing room . So it excludes men. Men can't just say "but there are cubicles!" They'd still be turned away presumably... So the cubicles don't make it ok
Read 4 tweets
31 Oct
. @GATEOrg are looking for a consultant to write a hit piece on UK feminists who are concerned about the replacement of sex by gender in law and policy and the transing of children...
Gate have noticed (as we have been saying for ages) that the movement of people concerned about gender ideology in the UK are not in the main right wing or religious but feminist and LGB lead.

These are people who founded and supported Stonewall and marched against section 28.
This does not fit with the story that the LGBT orgs and their funders have been telling themself: that the only people who object to the replacement of sex by 'gender identity' are conservative political and religious groups

globalphilanthropyproject.org

@GPP_Updates
Read 20 tweets
31 Oct
Kemi Badenoch confirms "Providers have the right to restrict the use of spaces on the basis of sex, and exclude transgender people with or without a GRC if this is justified."

But what does "if this is justified" mean?

a-question-of-consent.net/2020/10/31/a-g…
The Equality Act allows for single sex spaces - including everyday privacy and dignity.

A single sex service means applying a sex based rule to the space
The question is does the Equality Act allow some people to claim that the sex based rules don't apply to them -- that some males can use female only spaces?

There isn't much specific case law on this - but there are good principles that apply from age discrimination cases.
Read 7 tweets
29 Oct
It's shocking that the @Commonswomequ Inquiry does not ask about the impact on women, but of course it can't because it has no word for them.

This erasure of the word is not just about Tampax marketing but about policy making.
Of course difficult women will answer w evidence on why this matters for women's rights

But established, funded womens groups, voluntary orgs, industry bodies will follow the ToRs which tell them from the start to discount women.

This happens in Equality Impact Assessments too.
Raising women's rights has been branded transphobic.

No one's asking about women so you have to be brave and difficult just to say there are women's rights at stake

It's shocking that after an amazing mobilisation of grassroots women's concerns that WESC don't see this
Read 6 tweets
28 Oct
The @Commonswomequ today announced a call for evidence on reform of the Gender Recognition Act

committees.parliament.uk/call-for-evide…
Select Committees are cross party groups of MPs.

This is not the government.

What they do is make recommendations to government, which the government have to respond to.
There is no formal template for inquiries. They can vary in length, with some published at short notice in response to high profile events.

This one is a tight timetable though.

Deadline is Friday November 27

(and it says it opened on October 6 🙄)
Read 17 tweets
27 Oct
This is the most shocking thing about @fawcettsociety fence sitting position

They say (with no evidence) that it is not safe or appropriate to house males who identify as women in the male estate.

They should be treated as women with "appropriate risk assessment"
That was in 2018 .

In 2020 they admitted that current brisk assessment processes are not reliable (so appropriate ones are just wishful thinking)

The prison system has to "find another way" ( but not in the male estate, they've already ruled that out).
As @Samsmethers said in her post on ways forward trans people want validation of identity , while womens concern is safety and dignity.

It is *inexplicable* that a woman's rights organisation should trade off womens safety for men's validation
fawcettsociety.org.uk/blog/sex-and-g…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!