@McAdooGordon@KingMakerFT@ProfMJCleveland What they said was is that the mandamus was not seeking relief from an order--that the relief sought was asking a judge to rule in a certain manner; they emphasized mandamus was not seeking relief from an order.
@McAdooGordon@KingMakerFT@ProfMJCleveland Example of needed framed request for relief: seeking the order of May 13, 2020 to be stricken based on erroneous denial to dismiss...
Which is different than asking the court to direct a judge to make a specific ruling as if the judge didn't make a decision.
Here are D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Srinivasan's own direct written words regarding a prosecutor's decision to bring or not bring criminal charges in the decision of U.S. v. Fokker,
818 F.3d 733 (D.C. Cir. 2016):
2/ "The Executive's primacy in criminal charges is long settled. That authority stems from the Constitution's delegation of 'take care' duties, U.S. Const. art II, section 3, and the pardon power."
3/ Judge Srinivasan described factors that a prosecutor's decision:
"the strength of the case, the prosecution's general deterence value, the govt's enforcement priorities and the case's relationship to the govt's overall enforcement plan."
@ThyConsigliori Specifically, I will show how Judge Sullivanโs May 13, 2020 Order to appoint Ret. Judge Gleeson as an โamicus curiaeโ indicates premeditated joint venture intended to influence, impede due & proper administration of the law in a pending DOJ court proceeding.
@ThyConsigliori 1/ 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1505 (Obstruction of Justice) states:
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due & proper administration of the law (cont'd below)
2/ In Part 1 of my D2J blog article Judge Emmet Sullivan Wears No Clothes, I explain how and why Judge Sullivanโs court order appointing Ret. John Gleeson as โamicus curiaeโ is in fact a shamโ
3/ I specifically, walk the reader through 50 U.S.C. Sec. 1803(4), the federal statute that defines the scope and purpose of an โamicus curiaeโ.
2/ I might be the only accredited (juris doctorate) legal professional who will not sugar coat Judge Emmet Sullivanโs over-the-top abuse of power in his issuance of his May 13, 2020 order in the General Michael Flynn case entitled: โOrder Appointing Amicus Curiaeโ.
3/ In this debut article, Iโll delve into how and why Judge Sullivanโs conduct is literally judicial thuggery. As indicated, this is Part 1 of an unlimited series of articles dedicated to empowering We The People in combatting judicial abuse of power.