Joe Biden is likely to win. The nightmare of the Trump years could be about to end. I’m feeling optimistic.
But it would be a mistake to count Trump out. So what might the electoral map look like if he wins? Here’s two scenarios.
[Thread]
Every poll makes assumptions about turnout and demographics. And each year, different pollsters tend to make similar assumptions.
A few of these have me especially worried.
1)
Polls show a big shift towards Biden among white and older voters.
Perhaps they are overstating the shift? Or perhaps turnout among the white working-class once again shatters expectations?
Either way, Trump could win the Midwest, and the map would look similar to 2016.
2)
Polls show a shift towards Trump among younger and non-white voters.
Perhaps this is a bigger trend than pollsters can imagine?
In that case, Trump might lose much of the Midwest but win by unexpectedly picking up purple states with a higher Latino population like CO + AZ.
Of course, these errors could also go the other way!
Perhaps pollsters are underestimating the shift towards Biden among whites and the elderly and/or overestimating turnout among the white working-class.
In which case, we *might* just be looking at something like this.
In short, a comfortable Biden win is likely. But an upset victory for Trump or a landslide we haven't seen in decades are also real possibilities.
We'll have to wait and see.
In the meanwhile, let's try to stay level-headed. (And vote!)
I'm starting to feel pretty damn good about America today.
Is this the grand univocal rejection of Trumpism many of us hoped for? No.
But the United States is doing better than Poland, Hungary, Turkey, India and so many other countries that were in a similar predicament.
It's time to take yes for an answer!
Why am I so much more optimistic today? Because of my baseline.
I've been arguing for years that populists have broad support and are a grave threat to democracy around the world. The fight will go on after today. That shouldn't be surprising.
It’s now difficult to remember how outlandish the position that "established" democracies could come under threat once was.
When Roberto Foa and I first showed a famous mentor our paper on deconsolidation, he strongly disagreed with the idea that democracy might be in danger.
But now, pessimism has become fashionable:
Pundits routinely warn of an impending civil war or worry that Donald Trump will carry out a putsch.
Yes, some Dems are too reluctant to oppose left-wing political violence and call out Antifa.
And yes, some on the left are too willing to support censorship in social media, advocate for employees to be fired for conservative views, and to cheer on attacks on free speech.
But..
1)
Trump presents a serious danger to constitutional values.
His bark is much, much louder than his bite. But his actual actions in office have also been utterly unacceptable.
Any voter genuinely concerned about the rise of illiberal forces must wish to remove him from office.
The boss of the NYT op-ed page was fired because he ran a controversial op-ed by a sitting U.S. Senator.
But a few months later, a propagandist for an authoritarian regime gets to argue that a violent putdown of peaceful protests was needed in the same pages.
This is just nuts.
I did not like Cotton's op-ed.
And there is a case for turning the NYT op-ed page into a venue that fights for liberal democratic values rather than printing all the opinion that's newsworthy.
But the hypocrisy here is just staggering.
It is also one of the best examples of, um, systemic racism in American journalism:
Want to advocate for brutal measures that might affect American lives? No way.
Want to advocate for brutal measures that destroy lives in Asia or Africa? Welcome to our pages!