I sent these questions to members of the Science and Technology Cmte to ask Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance. All linked carefully to government & other data.

They have not been asked, so I am publishing them to show how these public officials could have been examined.
Links here:
Q1. Dr Fauci: jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
Cevik study: medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Q2: test for admission data: coronavirus.data.gov.uk/about-data#eng…)
Double counting in different testing periods: gov.uk/government/pub…)
Q4: Emergency Department Synromic Surveillance System: England, 28.10.2020
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

Q6: Chris Whitty 'excess deaths key metric': msn.com/en-gb/news/cor…).

Q7: Heneghan, Jefferson et al, excess mortality 23.10.2020: cebm.net/covid-19/22268/
Q9: North West hospital occupancy data: england.nhs.uk/statistics/sta…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Francis Hoar

Francis Hoar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Francis_Hoar

5 Nov
This appears to be the serious criminal offence of false imprisonment. @gmpolice must investigate. If these students are being locked in their Hall or restricted from leaving, they must require these students to be released and should arrest those responsible.
@UniversityManch
There is no possible legal justification. Under the new Regulations, students are permitted to leave their residences for a reasonable excuse. The list is inclusive, not exclusive, and includes leaving for the purposes of outdoor recreation as well as exercise.
Nor do the Regulations permit any but police constables, PCSOs or officers appointed by the Secretary of State to enforce the Regulations (in any circumstances). Nor is it ever permitted for any person - including officers - ...
Read 5 tweets
1 Nov
Dear lockdowners,
Have a look at this chart and give yourselves a big pat on the back for the numerous excess deaths from heart disease for which your policy was responsible.
And that is just one of the many harms it caused. Image
And I will continue to repeat, until I am blue in the face:
No excess triage for respiratory infections;
No excess treatment for acute respiratory infections; and
No excess deaths from acute respiratory infections. ImageImageImageImage
Sources here. The heart disease chart was published by Carl Heneghan from government data.
https://t.co/DWuGp530M4
Read 5 tweets
31 Oct
We need to get this message out.
We have average levels of triage for respiratory infections, below average hospital admissions for and deaths from acute respiratory infections. The focus on statistics derived from flawed PCR tests are causing destructive fear and policies.
See triage data here:
Read 5 tweets
19 Oct
This is a lie. A lie.

Hospital beds in Greater Manchester are *below* their occupancy last year.

This confected hysteria, whipped up by government and media, is destroying our country.

More lies by the Welsh government:
https://t.co/yJBQoAwt1I
Read 6 tweets
6 Oct
The Grounds and the witness statement (containing the evidential basis of the claim) by @mikegardner_wb in the new judicial review against the Rule of Six and other recent regulations have now been published (see below).

static.crowdjustice.com/group_claim_do…

static.crowdjustice.com/group_claim_do…
Ground One argues that the use of the emergency procedure (under s 45R of the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 (as amended) was unlawful in the absence of any rational basis for considering these regulations to be urgent or (further and alternatively) necessary.
Ground Two mirrors the first ground in the Dolan (No. 1), the challenge to the original 'lockdown' regulations that is to be heard in the Court of Appeal on 29th October. It argues that the use of the 1984 Act for regulations as far reaching as these is unlawful.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!