This appears to be the serious criminal offence of false imprisonment. @gmpolice must investigate. If these students are being locked in their Hall or restricted from leaving, they must require these students to be released and should arrest those responsible. @UniversityManch
There is no possible legal justification. Under the new Regulations, students are permitted to leave their residences for a reasonable excuse. The list is inclusive, not exclusive, and includes leaving for the purposes of outdoor recreation as well as exercise.
Nor do the Regulations permit any but police constables, PCSOs or officers appointed by the Secretary of State to enforce the Regulations (in any circumstances). Nor is it ever permitted for any person - including officers - ...
...to prevent any other person from leaving their place of residence; or restricting them from leaving unless they can establish a 'reasonable excuse'.
The only powers are for officers (not including University officials) to require them to disperse or return home if they are outside their place of residence *and* the officer has reasonable grounds for believing that they do not have a reasonable excuse.
I have been sent this by a concerned parent of a sixth former at a boarding school, who was sent it in turn. It is atrocious and would appear to amount to false imprisonment. It is all too typical of schools and universities so I use it to illustrate the gravity of this problem.
This is without prejudice to the contention that the Regulations themselves amount to false arrest. Even if that is right, an institution may be guilty of the offence and tort of false imprisonment if the restrictions they impose go beyond (here, well beyond) the law.
Two initial points.
First, the children are told they 'must' abide by the restrictions.
Secondly, it has been indicated to them that these restrictions are because of the law, when most of the restrictions emphatically are not.
Countries whose police forces break up protests violently and do so spouting state propaganda are not liberal democracies.
Lawyers and others who stand aside and greet this with silence - or, worse, active support - are no friends of liberal democracy. bbc.com/news/uk-englan…
The @barcouncil and @TheLawSociety went into apoplexy when the government passed a law allowing one element of an international treaty about trade to be disregarded in domestic law.
Yet when the government tears up cardinal democratic rights and breaches the fundamental rights to freedom of worship, to family life and to property they stand by.
Mute.
I sent these questions to members of the Science and Technology Cmte to ask Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance. All linked carefully to government & other data.
They have not been asked, so I am publishing them to show how these public officials could have been examined.
Dear lockdowners,
Have a look at this chart and give yourselves a big pat on the back for the numerous excess deaths from heart disease for which your policy was responsible.
And that is just one of the many harms it caused.
And I will continue to repeat, until I am blue in the face:
No excess triage for respiratory infections;
No excess treatment for acute respiratory infections; and
No excess deaths from acute respiratory infections.
Sources here. The heart disease chart was published by Carl Heneghan from government data.
We need to get this message out.
We have average levels of triage for respiratory infections, below average hospital admissions for and deaths from acute respiratory infections. The focus on statistics derived from flawed PCR tests are causing destructive fear and policies.