Today is Election Day. My vote is for Donald Trump, and I believe yours should be too. 1/18
God has blessed us with an incredible inheritance—a country and culture that, despite past and present flaws, have helped create nearly unparalleled freedom and prosperity for generations of Americans. 2/18
America faces profound crises and divisions, and we have imperfect choices to govern us. Yet Trump is not just the lesser of two evils. He has been right in important ways that nearly all others have downplayed or ignored. 3/18
While the establishment right remained stuck in a playbook that has failed for half a century, Trump has recognized and stood firmly against existential threats to American civilization. 4/18
Trump is far from a perfect person. In other eras he might be a terrible choice for president. But given the threat today, he may be uniquely well suited for the job. Today’s leftist ideology is devoted not simply to a stronger safety net or... 5/18
...greater investment in people from less-advantaged backgrounds, but to attacking and erasing our history, warring against basic norms and truths (from culture to the concept of gender itself), celebrating abortion and immorality... 6/18
...destroying the concept of personal agency with an all-pervasive victim/oppressor narrative, and pushing a mindset of guilt-without-forgiveness and irredeemable shame on the American people. 7/18
Establishment Democrats, including Joe Biden, have allied themselves with this ideology and made clear they will not stop it. Establishment Republicans have paid lip service to criticisms of it, but largely sidestepped the issue by focusing on tax cuts and foreign policy. 8/18
Trump, in contrast, has focused on this threat—unapologetically celebrating America and embracing what we are told to apologize for. Elites have abandoned truth for narrative, and Trump is a master of challenging their narrative and pointing back to American ideals. 9/18
Some may assume I support Trump out of self-interest. But my immediate self-interest is probably the opposite.
Biden/Harris may raise taxes, push social policies I detest, and increase the regulatory burden on business. But given where I am now... 10/18
... I could easily carry on in business and largely insulate myself from their tax increases, pay for private education for my kids, and leverage relationships in government to navigate any regulatory maze. Any impact on my lifestyle would be negligible. 11/18
The corrupt combo of woke ideology and economic centralization manifest in woke capitalism will be devastating for much of the country. But I am well positioned to play this game—a game that rewards credentials, capital, and connections. 12/18
The natural path—the socially “proper" path—would be for me to focus on Trump's flaws and our country’s failings. It would be for me to embrace a more conscious and “inclusive” approach to business and politics, one high in public virtue but conveniently low in actual... 13/18
...cost to people like me. It would be for me to take a “principled” stand against the contradictions and character flaws present in any political realm, comfortably avoiding the hard decisions and unpleasant tradeoffs of any real-world political decision. 14/18
But I do not just reluctantly support Trump, while pining for a more “pure” conservative. A return to establishment norms might advantage me, but this path would destroy America. The collapse of social norms would devastate those outside high-social-capital communities... 15/18
...growing credentialism would further exclude many workers, and the left’s messages would further stir up racial division and resentment. Republicans who focus on market efficiency while ignoring this cultural sickness would only help many Americans fall further behind. 16/18
I support Trump because he is directly challenging this course—because he recognizes the severity of this threat and the need to move traditional beyond traditional Republican norms and conservative mantras to combat it. 17/18
America is divided, and an evil ideology has gained powerful sway. Though any path through this will be messy and painful, I believe Donald Trump is fighting to return our country and culture to the path that has brought so many blessings to the American people. 18/18
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Robinhood/crowdfunding/etc push small investors into the same commoditized financial products as pros. Instead of leveraging an information edge, they're competing at a disadvantage.
Small investors should be taking advantage of their small size and non-Wall Street context.
If small investors can deploy capital based on real advantages—of information, judgment, or access—they may earn true excess returns. Without this edge, anything beyond passive allocation is simply speculation.
This is not the partisan dilemma it’s often presented as. The poor have suffered most from the destruction of family norms and public morality, much of it actively pushed by the left.
It’s easy for Christians in high-social-capital communities to focus on material issues. 1/4
But the material-focused War on Poverty has accomplished little, while the cultural liberation mainstreamed in the 60s has done great harm, especially to those with less social or economic margin.
Even if you exclude abortion, you cannot claim to care about the poor... 2/4
...and ignore the crusade against social and family norms (abortion access reflects only a part) now almost universally supported by the left.
You can debate the best ways to restore norms, but you cannot deny the active harm of the left’s sexual and cultural agenda. 3/4
Christians: we agree slavery is bad, but in seeking the power to limit it, you have destroyed your Christian witness by embracing a politician who shows no sign of Christian faith, tears apart our country, tramples our constitutional rights, and threatens war on his opponents.
Whatever our personal views, we are a democracy and the principle of popular sovereignty is central to our move of government. If we want to stop the expansion of slavery in the territories, the only legitimate way to do so is by winning the hearts and minds of the people there.
Any attempt to impose our views through raw political power—to trample on the process by which states have made their laws since the foundation of our republic—will only discredit our cause and drive honorable people away from us and even away from the Christian faith.
One wonders if many Christian influencers have any true political convictions.
By seeing support for Trump as only a bargain for power, they fail to recognize that many Christians believe politics really matter. 2/5
Many Christians recognize that grave injustices exist today, and that real evils threaten our society. They believe the establishment path will not stop this, but the Trump-led turn may change our course and protect America’s promise to people of all backgrounds. 3/5
David French relentlessly urges Christians to shrink from practical political engagement. Focusing on the flaws and contradictions inevitable in any politician or party, he pushes us to avoid party politics.
Whatever his intent, his impact is to reduce Christian influence. 1/7
Echoing @timkellernyc, he glosses over sharp differences with asides like “(Never mind that their ranks are also full of millions of Christian believers.)”
The same was true of the WWII battle lines. Would French have called for Christians to “remain homeless” in that fight? 2/7
When someone is so committed to undermining practical political engagement—rather than simply reminding us of our ultimate loyalty to Christ—it’s worth considering whose interests he is advancing. 3/7
There is a certain type of Christian leader who recognizes that Western civilization and American culture have produced a government and society particularly conducive to human flourishing, yet out of guilt for the past failures of this culture ...
(including failures of the white American church), he wants to see this culture taken down a notch. He wraps his appeals in the language of humility, but is actually seeking to abdicate the responsibility of cultural and political influence. ...
He wishes this knowing full well that any successor regime would likely be worse—not only for us but for the very groups he's claiming we must make amends to—because such a successor would abandon much of what has made our government and society so appealing. ...