Again, we're legally prevented from leaving our homes without "reasonable excuse".
The vote's a foregone conclusion. Johnson already instructed us to lockdown last week - MPs will vote for it after just 90 mins of 'debate' tomorrow.
To be in this position again, 7 months after the first lockdown, reflects the Government's astronomical failures over the past 9 months.
It is wholly unacceptable to plunge the nation into house arrest via leaks, press statements and complex, last minute Regulations.
We will get through this. But we must work harder than ever to recover.
The damage being done to lives, liberties and the rule of law cannot be understated.
Our civil liberties will never be the same again unless we fight to protect them fearlessly now.
We'll hold authorities to account. If you have an unfair fine or arrest, or see anything of concern, please contact us: info@bigbrotherwatch.org.uk
We'll provide monthly reports to MPs; we'll continue our investigations, and we'll take legal action where needed + where we can.
We want you to know: we applied to intervene in the legal challenge to the 1st lockdown. We supported the case that the lockdown was undemocratic & unlawful. Unfortunately, our application + appeal was rejected.
But as long as we have your support, we'll never give up.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨NEW: A law is in force *today* requiring venues to collect our personal data, or else be fined £500.
Pubs, cafés, restaurants, even workplace canteens must refuse entry to anyone who doesn’t want to share this data.
This change is huge. It's a mass recording of our movements.
As well as pubs, restaurants + workplace canteens, this law requires
sports clubs + gyms 🏋️♀️
heritage sites 🏰
arcades 🕹️
hotels 🏨
museums 🎨
libraries 📖
barbers 💇♂️
nail bars 💅
community + youth centres 👨👩👦👦
village halls 🏡
AND many other locations to collect personal data.
Venues must display Gov-issued QR codes which link to the NHS contact tracing app when it's launched next week.
Don’t have the app? You'll be required to leave contact details, the time + date of your visit, the size of your group + the name of any staff member you interact with
STATEMENT: The public is enduring a shock and awe campaign of complex and contradictory executive commands, endowed with the weight of criminal sanctions. Ministerial decrees like those we've seen today require us to reflect on the damage parliamentary democracy has sustained /1
during this crisis. The restrictions may be justified, but this should be a matter for parliament. It is alarming that ministers are governing via press statements rather than the democratic process. /2
CONTACT TRACING: The Prime Minister’s plans to legally require pubs, restaurants and other premises to demand customers’ details and become data controllers overnight are excessive, intrusive and pose serious privacy risks. Voluntary systems that respect individuals’ judgement /3
This is the first time the CPS has ever launched a review of every charge under a specific law.
Huge thanks to our Researcher @madeleine_beth who has been calling courts! And Times journalist @fariha54 + human rights lawyer @Kirsty_Brimelow bringing much needed scrutiny👏
The Times view:
"This zealotry is unfair on law-abiding citizens who find themselves treated like criminals (..) That is particularly dangerous since the [rules] rely on public consent. Should large numbers decide to rebel, the police would not have the manpower to enforce them"
Empowers police, immigration officers & public health officials to demand documentation; detain & isolate members of the public potentially indefinitely, including children; & forcibly take biological samples for testing /1
It permits prohibition of public events & gatherings without standard protections for strikes & industrial action that exist in Civil Contingencies Act 2004.
It weakens safeguards on the exercise of mass surveillance powers, quadrupling time review limits for urgent warrants /2
It is right that Government is taking rapid and robust action to protect public health, but we cannot let basic rights fall casualty to this crisis.
Our country faces challenges best when we hold onto our values, not abandon them. /3
To be clear the Government is making private companies legally resposible for what we, individuals, say to each other. This explicitly requires mass surveillance & censorship.
This is going to be a disaster for privacy & free speech online.
The “duty of care” regulation proposed today gives social media companies legal responsibility for preventing psychological “harm” - undefined - arising from online chats between members of the public.
The result? Social media companies have to police private conversations.
The proposal goes far beyond policing unlawful content. It explicitly creates powers for lawful speech to be ‘regulated’.
It subjects lawful speech online to state-sponsored censorship, imposed by an unelected regulator. This directly undermines the right to free expression.
BREAKING: Kings Cross under private facial recognition surveillance @kingscrossN1C
This is the worst case scenario for privacy. Huge areas of our capital have been sold off, privately policed - and now are being covered with Chinese-style surveillance.