Biden will win this, but there are sobering lessons for the opponents of national populism. Thread.
1/ National populist candidates have appeal across different countries, and ethnic groups. They’re dangerous, and they’re not going away.
2/ They appeal to their voters in a genuine way, not only because of propaganda and disinformation. Voting for these candidates meets a need, and isn’t because people have been fooled.
3/ A proportion of their supporters are what we might call anti-leftists: they find the left wing view of the world naive, preachy, smug and so on.
4/ Exhibit A is the Floridian Cuban-Americans and Venezuelan-Americans. AOC and her ilk scare them.
5/ These people need a constitutional conservative, centre-right force to vote for.
6/ A “progressive” movement (incidentally a label conservatives hate because it excludes them) can’t achieve lasting change without persuading the centre-right.
7/ But that needs them to accept the legitimacy of centre-right politics. Without it, national populists will keep winning votes, paralyse, or even destroy constitutional democracy.

ENDS.
PS: This doesn’t mean fighting the populists on their territory, or implementing their policies for them. The idea is to find different ways to relate to their voters.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Garvan Walshe

Garvan Walshe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garvanwalshe

3 Nov
Read a sneak preview of @article7news’s recommended rule of law links. First up, @VALERIEin140’s interview with Judit Varga

ft.com/content/7f5755…
Then we see that the Polish government’s anti-abortion cursade is failing - driving votes to the new Polska 2050 Party. And remember the far-right thugs outside Polish churches? They don’t need defending says the head of the Polish episcopate. Thanks @MaZaborowski
As another week of negotiations of rule of law conditionality opens, Hungary’s still applying the anti-NGO law that was struck down by @EUCourtPress — to funding from the EU’s own ErasmusPlus!
Read 5 tweets
10 Sep
.@SuellaBraverman asserts that parliamentary sovereignty means Parliament is free to disapply treaties. This is not correct. If it were, as I explain in @ConHome today, the government would actually not have the power to make treaties. Thread.

conservativehome.com/thecolumnists/…
1/ This has to do with the concept of a binding obligation, and the correlative right to enforce (or waive) that obligation.
2/ If the treaty contains a binding obligation one one party, it means the other party has the right to demand the obligation is performed, and hence the power to waive or enforce the obligation.
Read 8 tweets
24 Jun
Before the referendum I wrote that a vote to Leave would turn Britain into Argentina, with Peronist politics, a volatile currency, leading to long term relative economic decline. 1/

conservativehome.com/thecolumnists/…
It’s too early to judge the long term economic effects, but here are some straws in the wind 2/
Peronist politics: a politics where a self-dealing traditional elite uses the politics of resentment against a cultural elite to win over working class voters 2/
Read 9 tweets
19 Jun
Largely peaceful and voluntary dismantling. This is such an absurd rewriting of history and unbecoming of Danny Kruger who really should know better.

Here is a thread showing some peaceful and voluntary dismantling of the British empire. 1/
2/ The Battles of Lexington and Concord, generally accepted to be the start of the peaceful and voluntary dismantling of the British Empire.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battles_o…
3/ Rebellion by the United Irishmen, 1798

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Reb…
Read 15 tweets
6 May
The governments of Poland and Hungary are deliberately misrepresenting the German Constitutional Court’s judgement on the ECB to bolster their attacks on the EU’s legal order.

Rather than repeat their propaganda, it is important to understand why it’s misleading. THREAD
1/ HU and PL are asserting that it shows that member states can individually decide the applicability of EU law on the grounds that member state constitutional law is superior to EU law (even if EU law is superior to ordinary national legislation)
2/ This is of course not what actually happens. The way the #BVerfG understands the situation rather is through the conferral of competences.
Read 17 tweets
30 Mar
Hungary's Enabling act is a grave miscalculation by Orbán. 1/
First, it removes the disguise from a disguised regime. As @DanielHegedus82 put it - Hungary is now an autocracy without Adjectives.
Second, it refutes Orbán's own legitimation narrative. His rule was supposed to depend on electoral legitimacy: this law allows him to rule indefinitely without them. 3/
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!