Weird numbers being reported in #txlege#tx148 race - Harris Votes shows 91,593 registered voters total in the district. Their results have Penny Shaw, the Democrat, winning the traditionally Democratic district 38,158 to the GOP candidate's 21,780.
Those Harris Votes numbers are in line with past elections in this same seat ~ usually around 50-60K votes cast. The district is entirely within Harris County, so all the numbers shown on Harris Votes should be all the votes there are in the race. Then, it gets weird.
Texas SoS website & @KPRC2 show LaRotta (R) with 173,311 votes to 37,470 Shaw (D). That's 212,781 total votes, which is more than twice the number of registered voters in the district.
The @HoustonChron has Shaw with 38,046 votes, LaRotta with 21,705, but has given LaRotta the green check mark indicating he is the winner. Which by those numbers he is not. @KHOU is LaRotta 173,383, Shaw 34,891.
These are ALL unofficial results obviously. WTF though?
I took all of this from these outlets' website between 5:40 and 5:50 this morning. Official results will no doubt show Penny Shaw winning. But how do such disparate numbers get posted?
OK, @TexasTribune shows the same batshit bonkers results but also that something called Decision Desk HQ has bad numbers & they're checking into it. DDHQ is a service that aggregates results for news orgs, it seems. So how do they fuck this up?
And also, does this mean that the Secretary of State is showing numbers from a news service site rather than counties' numbers? I mean, they are unofficial results, all of them, but still.
Maybe we should all go back to bed for a few hours.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Count Every Vote / Every Vote Counts: A Story About Commitment to Fairness and Democracy
This is a story about my friend @LongoriaTx, Harris County's new Elections Administrator, & her runoff election in 2019 for Houston City Council against the incumbent.
Runoff election night, as we watch returns, the race tightens. At the evening's end, Longoria is losing by 12 votes to the incumbent council member. It's time for provisional ballots to be reviewed and cured if possible. We don't know which way those ballots will break.
After much 'that's not how we do it usually, but okay if you wanna,' Longoria & the incumbent's campaigns get a list of 558 names of people who voted provisionally. The list is lacking in key info, like which "John Smith" in District H is the one who voted a provisional ballot.
We need to talk about institutional racism and ableism in Texas & Gov. Abbott's press conference just now about the #COVID19 phased response that will #OpenTexas starting May 1st. #txlege#hounews A thread -
Abbott repeatedly urged that we must take care of vulnerable populations, which he seemed to be using synonymously with the elderly/people over 65. The elderly are not the only people more vulnerable to this virus. Different disabilities & health statuses can make ppl vulnerable
But Abbott stressed the elderly, saying that although they were a small (maybe 25%) of those infected, they are >75% of those who die from it. So he was talking clearly about a disproportionate impact on the elderly being a reason to take extra care.