1/11 Some are arguing that because hospital intensive care is currently no busier than normal for majority of trusts, national lockdown isn't justifiable. See, for example this: telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/11/0…. This ignores three key issues and the argument is therefore erroneous.
2/11 Issue 1. Measuring the degree of pressure in a hospital just by looking at its ICU capacity is wrong and potentially very misleading. Hospital CEOs saying that you need to look at general and acute ward bed pressure as well as ICU bed pressure...
3/11 ...At the moment, hospital CEOs tell us that the pressure is often greater in acute and general beds and not in intensive care. This is partly because many more covid-19 patients are being treated with oxygen therapy on general wards than in the first phase.
4/11 Issue 2. NHS argument is that if hospitals have too many covid-19 patients over next two to three months they won't be able to deal with winter pressures and carry on recovering elective surgery backlogs. Those cases are usually treated in general and acute not ICU beds...
5/11 ...EG Hospital CEOs in north tell us they're having to turn general/acute beds into covid-19 beds & transfer staff to cover those beds. That's what's threatening elective surgery recovery rates & could threaten ability to cope w winter pressures. Not pressure on ICU capacity
6/11 ...Despite doing all they can to avoid this, the hospitals most under pressure are now having to start slowing down the speed at which they are recovering elective surgery backlogs. Clear evidence that higher levels of covid mean NHS can't do winter job we need it to do.
7/11 Issue 3. There is no point in using national level bed usage data to support any argument here. The pressure is highly geographically concentrated & that won't show up in any national aggregate data. Many hospital CEOs in the north tell us they are under extreme pressure...
8/11 ...Many of them say their covid-19 patient numbers are above what they saw in the peak of the first phase. Higher levels of community covid-19 infection rates also mean higher levels of staff absence, making it more difficult to provide the right quality of care...
9/11...The argument from NHS CEOs in rest of country is many are already seeing high worrying levels of general bed occupancy. And if the covid pattern in the north is repeated elsewhere in the country a month later, it'll coincide with winter when NHS is at its most stretched...
10/11 ...This means trusts won't be able to give the treatment and quality of care they would want, to all who need it. None of this is reflected in, or affected by, current national ICU bed occupancy rates. They are irrelevant as far as this risk is concerned.
11/11 The argument that the NHS is making for national lockdown therefore fully stands. See, for example, the letter we have sent to MPs today, ahead of the vote on the new lockdown regulations. nhsproviders.org/news-blogs/new….
1/17 Where are we up to? The NHS trust perspective on the current COVID-19 second surge and the imminent national lockdown set out below in one of my threads. Usual statement at the top - @NHSProviders is the voice of NHS trusts. We are not the Government or @NHSEngland.
2/17 NHS trust leaders have been saying for a very long time that the task they faced this winter already looked very difficult. Clear risk of a “perfect storm”: full blown second covid surge, usual winter pressures as well as recovering important care backlogs from first phase…
3/17 …At a point when NHS capacity has been reduced (hospital trusts saying by between 10-30%) due to need to keep covid and non-covid patients separate. And when staff are tired, with risk of sickness absence rising in any covid second surge. All on top of 80,000 vacancies.
1/6 A final twitter plug for the lecture I delivered to @ActuaryCompany this week on the lessons to learn, as a nation, from covid-19. I asked five questions, deliberately taking a wider, stand-back, view of what has happened so far...actuariescompany.co.uk/chris-hopson-c…
2/6 Q1. Do we need to improve the way we manage infrequent, but very high impact, way of life changing, events such as global pandemics? Many organisations (e.g. NHS trusts) spend a lot of time thinking about how to better manage risk. Do we now need to do this as a nation?
3/6 Q2. Most of big, way of life threatening, risks are global - they transcend nation state boundaries. So do we, as a nation, need to do more to strengthen the currently weak international architecture to manage those risks? We are in a potentially good position to do so.
1/14 Front page story from @thesundaytimes on how NHS treated patients in first phase of covid-19. We think it's given an inaccurate and misleading picture of what happened. Initial thread below. Gathering more detail from members to add to a blog later this week.
2/14 Article alleges NHS was routinely excluding elderly patients from hospitals / intensive care during first phase of covid-19. Evidence includes routine usage of triage tool to deny critical care & not admitting care home patients. Trusts tell us this is incorrect.
3/14 Some facts from an NHS trust perspective. 1.The NHS did not run out of critical care capacity at any point during the first phase of covid-19. Critical care capacity remained available to everybody who would benefit from it. The key is the concept of “benefit from it”.
1/14 Important new blog for @timesredbox on why the NHS needs the Government and local authorities to now move quickly and decisively to create tougher local lockdowns wherever required: thetimes.co.uk/article/hospit…
2/14 Increasing numbers of coronavirus cases have translated into rapidly rising hospital admissions, especially in NE, NW and Yorks. For a few trusts, the number of COVID-19 hospital patients is now at the same level they had reached at the height of the first phase.
3/14 Trust leaders clear about lessons from the first phase of COVID-19. The virus strikes at very different rates in different localities, so appropriate local responses are needed. The only way to control the spread of COVID-19 is by reducing social contact.
1/6 There has been an ongoing debate on the degree to which hospital discharges were responsible for the high mortality rates in care homes in the first phase of covid-19. This paper, considered by SAGE on 25 Sept, provides important new evidence: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
2/6 It says that retrospective genomic analysis and serpositive studies found evidence for multiple routes into care homes. Staff, visitors, visiting professionals, hospital discharges, new admissions and persistent infections may have all contributed to introduction of covid-19.
3/6 However, and here is the key para (para 4.3 in the document): Weight of evidence is stronger in some areas than others. Evidence of staff to staff transmission has emerged in the genomic analysis (high confidence)......
1/14 NHS financial allocations for second half of the year released overnight. Thread of initial thoughts below. Probably of most interest to those steeped in, and fans of, the delights of NHS finances. But some potentially big issues depending on how this plays out.....
2/14 NHS frontline been waiting for allocations for some time, so good that they have finally arrived. There is a lot of complexity here. These allocations have been made at system level for the first time and they also include some detailed calculations on individual items.
3/14 Four specific areas of concern that we expect trusts to raise. First, some ambitious assumptions about recovering non-NHS income that will be a significant issue for a number of trusts who are a long way off from seeing their non NHS income return to pre-COVID levels.