Ferg Profile picture
5 Nov, 17 tweets, 3 min read
Thread

I was digging through some notes from reading @AnnieDuke book: Thinking in Bets.

Loved this book and her podcast with @ritholtz
on Masters-in-business.

This is a key book for anyone interested in trading/investing

Here are some of my takeaways and favorite quotes.
1. How sure are you of a belief you hold if asked, “Wanna bet $1000 your belief is correct?”

Are you still 100% sure or maybe only 70%?

This helps to ensure you’re not blindly defending your belief and instead inviting skepticism and a search for the best information.
2. “Thinking in bets starts with recognizing that there are exactly two things that determine how our lives turn out:

The quality of our decisions and luck.

Learning to recognize the difference between the two is what thinking in bets is all about.”
3. We have a tendency to equate the quality of a decision with the quality of its outcome.
4. Poker players have a word for this:

“Resulting”

"When I started playing poker, more experienced players warned me about the dangers of resulting, cautioning me to resist the temptation to change my strategy just because a few hands didn’t turn out well in the short run.”
5. Resulting is a close companion of hindsight bias.

Which is the tendency, after an outcome is known, to see the outcome as having been inevitable.

When we say, “I should have known that would happen,” or, “I should have seen it coming,” we are succumbing to hindsight bias.”
6. You have games of complete information such as chess where outcomes are closely tied to decision quality.

Which is why computers are better at chess than poker.
7. Poker is a game of incomplete information.

It is a game where luck plays a large role and the best decision will not always result in the best outcome.

Which is how the real world works
8. We are biased to want to reflexively field bad outcomes as all luck or good ones as all skill.
9. Viewing negative outcomes as a result of bad luck means you miss opportunities to learn from your mistakes and improve your decisions.

Whereas claiming skill was the main factor in good outcomes means you will likely repeat the decisions that weren’t ideal.
10. “We all have a blind spot about recognizing our biases.

The surprise is that blind-spot bias is greater the smarter you are.”
11. “It’s easy to win a bet against someone who takes extreme positions.”
12. Its easier to be objective when new information is presented if your previous stance was;

“I was 75% but now I’m 50%.”

As its easier to swallow then saying;

“I thought I was right but now I’m wrong.”
13. “The benefits of recognizing just a few extra learning opportunities compound over time.

The cumulative effect of being a little better at decision-making, like compounding interest, can have huge effects in the long run on everything that we do.”
14. Utilise negative visualization, or a premortem to improve decision making by visualizing why you failed to reach your goal.

Similar to Mungers “Invert, always invert.”

Working from the end result backward can help you anticipate potential obstacles.
15. “Our problem is that we’re ticker watchers of our own lives.

Happiness is not best measured by looking at the ticker, zooming in, and magnifying moment-by-moment or day-by-day movements.

We would be better off thinking about our happiness as a long-term stock holding.”
16. A great decision is the result of a good process - not that it has a great outcome.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ferg

Ferg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @trader_ferg

3 Aug
Thread

Had never heard of the Princess Brides battle of wits

Mike Green @profplum99 mentions it is the basis for his twitter avatar and a reminder to ensure he's playing the game he thinks he is playing

Didn't really follow so looked up the dialogue

It's so good....
Man in Black: I challenge you to a battle of wits.

Vizzini: For the princess?  

To the death?  

I accept. 

Man in Black: Good.

Then pour the wine. 

[Vizzini pours the wine, and the Man in Black pulls out a small vial]
[He puts the goblets behind his back and, presumably, adds the poison to one of them, then sets them down in front of him]

All right. Where is the poison? The battle of wits has begun. It ends when you decide and we both drink, and find out who is right... and who is dead.
Read 14 tweets
31 Jul
Thread

Had a few aha moments thanks to the work of Mike Green @profplum99 & @HorizonKinetics

1. Passive being ‘buy and hold’ is misleading as really they are actually systematic active investors at any price

Positive flows = buy at any price
Negative flows = sell at any price
2. Passive is cornering stocks float

Take Amazon

Market cap minus inside ownership (15%) =$1.2T

Passive holds ~$910B which isn't for sale and is increasing with positive inflows

Which means available float is only ~290B

Index funds are in process of cornering $AMZN stock
3. Passive being past the point of being able to rebalance

Take Tech =21% of the index

What happens if it wants to rebalance into energy at 3%

There is only $1 active for $2 passive so they can't buy it and why would they buy it?

Energy is likely outperforming hence rebalance
Read 6 tweets
23 Apr
"Last time we did money printing nothing happened"

Few people actually understand why we got away with it

1/ It was done at the same time China was undertaking massive infrastructure spending

2/Tech also held prices down

3/Globalisation was in full swing which is deflationary
All these factors have now broken down or reversed

Globalisation is now dead.

Talk is of restoring national production chains which is hugely inflationary (rebuilding the chain and doing it with a higher cost labour force).

Supply chains are also broken at both ends
We now have a supply shock and a demand shock

Tech offshoring manufacturing may have to be re-shored with the corresponding price increases. Tech startups can no longer burn cash indefinitely

What we are seeing in the commodities (particularly oil) is further reduction of CAPEX
Read 5 tweets
4 Mar
Thread on Kazakhs Production

Kazakh's can now sell their uranium at the spot price to their Swiss marketing subsidiary which can then market it higher aboard or pool inventory to sell at a higher price

No more direct selling into spot market as per Kazakhs transfer pricing laws
ISR Production

“It’s important to keep in mind that ISR production is similar to oil and gas production. It produces a lot when the well is first tapped and then production declines. As the production declines, new wells are drilled to offset the production decline rates."
First is mine exploration and mine development expenditures where Kazak’s have gone from spending $94m a year in 2011 to $18m in 2017. It's hard to imagine an 80% drop in mine exploration and development investment coinciding with increasing production (or even being maintained).
Read 6 tweets
7 Feb
This chart should get more air time.

"Ultimately, the utilities have no other choice but to start contracting—and soon—as their uncovered uranium needs exiting 2020 exceed 20%. From the order date, it takes utilities 18–24 months to get the fuel." - Mike Alkin @FootnotesFirst Image
This is nice but why hasn't spot moved?

"Because spot is a bullshit market"

65-70% of it is just trader churn for example only 10mlbs was physically delivered in 2019.

Term price is the important one

Well that isn't moving either its stuck at 32lb!

It's stuck there because
All the term deals being done have non-disclosure clauses that are difficult to remove

So the term prices aren't reported

The only way we hear about them are via calls mentioning they are signing contracts with a "4 handle"

What changes this?
Read 5 tweets
19 Jan
Making up a list of uranium miners with estimated time to production and at what cost

Exclude all names currently producing like $CCJ $KAP $UUUU $URG $PEN

Here is my current list (favourites)

$PDN ~12months to production at a cost of $78m for a production capacity of 8mlbs pa
$BOE 9-12months. cost? Assume low as already $170m of established infrastructure. Production: 880mlbs 1st year, 2mlbs year 2nd year, 3.3mlbs 4th year.

$GLO Final feasibility study die 2021 earliest production probably ~12months? Advantage of development funded by zinc business
$LAM 12-18mths as has all permits for US ISR mines. Cost $30m with aim of 1mlbs pa.

$VMY claims mine ready in 2020?

Who am I missing or what of the above have I got wrong?

@quakes99 @uraniuminsider @timothychilleri @tsizzle84 @FissionMan1
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!