2/ who refused to accept legitimacy of the 2016 elections?
Hillary and her DNC friends
did their electorate call them "illegitimate"?
or did their electorate become even more energized?
acquiescing doesn't drive energy nor respect
pic: 2017's women's march on washington
3/ it's not merely a question "but maybe there was no cheating in the election?"
there was.
even worse, the dems also cheated *the process itself*.
refusal of voter ID; widespread mail-in voting; same-day registration.
4/ even if we were to acquiesce to the election-day cheating as "one-off" and to be fixed by the next election
it won't be, it can't be
because the *process itself* has been cheated and corrupted and undermined, and the bad process has been made into bad law & bad precedents.
5/ the system was rigged for both fraud AND for making it *untrustwothy*. that's several cases of cheating the integrity.
the Dems prepared to both have the cake and eat it too. either Biden win or laud Trump as "illegitimate" or make people disengaged through the maze of cheats
6/ the real *heart* of the cheat is in permanently stealing the choice and the execution
away from the citizens and from citizen-elected structures
and giving it to the utterly unaccountable *media*, who would now be the anointed *proclaimers* of presidency.
NO. NO TO THAT.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ i agree with several key assertions. excellent observation:
>[some call 2020] the most important election in their lifetime. On a personal note I disagree with that, because 2016 became much more significant due to the influence that Trump ended up having on the Supreme Court
3/ very much on point:
>I don't want us to hedge all of our bets on the future of this nation solely on the back of Donald Trump.
great, great:
“it's not whether or not you get knocked down, it's if you get back up.”