Interesting to read US State Dept recent criticism of Belarus elections. "prohibition of local independent observers at polling stations" - uh, tell that to Trump campaign in Philadelphia
"detentions of peaceful protesters". "Peaceful protestors" - isn't that the term used by US media for Antifa rioters destroying cities?
"We regret that OSCE/ODIHR observers did not receive a timely invitation to monitor the vote." Uh, did OSCE/ODIHR observers even get an invitation to monitor vote in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin? Why not? Maybe they could have prevented rampant fraud or removed suspicion
and most notably, State Dept objected to "use of internet shutdowns to hinder the ability of the Belarusian people to share information about the election". Uh, Twitter anyone? Facebook anyone?
in July, State Dept complained about "credible reports of polling staff handing out ballots already filled in with Ba’ath party candidates." State Dept is also in receipt of credible reports of rampant ballot harvesting of illegal ballots in multiple US states.
it turns out that international observer organization was allowed to observe in some states, but denied access to Philadelphia.
I've put my statistical analyst hat back on and have started to parse election data.
I've noticed something very counter-intuitive in Pennsylvania data, which commentators have totally missed thus far.
2/ There is only one PA county where Trump dramatically improved Republican - Democrat margin. Without overthinking it, take a guess which one before looking at the answer.
3/ It's Philadelphia!!
Trump reduced the deficit in Philadelphia by ~44K votes from the 2016 deficit vs Hillary.
PA website shows 763K mail-in ballots still to be counted with Trump lead of 165K. At split of mail in ballots observed thus far, this would indicate fairly comfortable Biden victory. But there's reason to believe that rate of Biden gain/100K count is going to slow down.
2/ PA shows outstanding mail ballots by county and elsewhere shows R/D proportion in each county. votespa.com/About-Election…
The inventory of Philadelphia+Pittsburgh uncounted mailin is now 165K, which would prob reduce margin by ~103K. Not enough on its own.
3/ of the remaining ~600K, there is a slight majority in counties with Republican majority. For example, York, a Republican county, has 77K uncounted.
@Alexey__Kovalev 1/ good that you're covering this story, but you're still not up to speed on the entire story. In addition to his purported Russian network, Steele instructed Danchenko to locate sources within the Trump campaign in the US. This instruction resulted in the most explosive and
@Alexey__Kovalev 2/ and damaging memos in the dossier - the reports (especially Report 95 right after Wikileaks drop) alleging collusion between Trump campaign and Russian intel services, including the supposed devil's bargain to hack the DNC and publish DNC hack at Wikileaks to elect Trump.
@Alexey__Kovalev 3/ the Steele dossier attributed the information in these memos to Sergei Millian. However, it can be proven that Millian never met Danchenko (or Steele). The narrative in these memos was entirely fabricated by one or both of Steele and Danchenko. None of Galkina, Podobedova etc
Interview with Olga Galkina (Source 3) published today in Russia. She says that Danchenko fabricated information attributed to her. mk.ru/politics/2020/…
2/ in my jugement, there are multiple layers of fabrication involving both Steele and Danchenko, with Steele's fabrications being much the worse. However, Steele and Danchenko both employ the classic The Other Dude Did It defense. Both should have been charged as co-conspirators.
3/ Read the interview. It's very interesting. Galkina says that it is impossible that she had the communications attribution to her by Danchenko. She calls for a full investigation of Steele dossier fraud.
@KSantal the $5 million capital contribution by CEFC to Hudson West IV has different legal status than proposed $5 million loan to Oneida Holdings for their capital contribution to Sinohawk. The chronology is complicated. But yes, the $ 5 million isright place to start.
@KSantal while there are so many potential offenses that it's hard to keep track, Hunter clearly did NOT provide $4.8 million of "consulting services" for Hudson West IV from Aug 2017 to Sep 2018, as HW-4 and CEFC were not pursuing business opportunities as CEFC collapsed.
@KSantal in other words, Hunter (using Owasco) appropriated/embezzled $4.8 million from Hudson West IV for personal use without providing "honest services" to Hudson West IV (or even CEFC).
information about the Biden-China CEFC scam has been placed online piecemeal. I've written a lengthy narrative in which I've organized all information that I'm presently aware of. scribd.com/document/48241…
2/ it's a sordid story in which the Bidens not only end up with $5 million in cash from the Chinese, but stiffed Bobulinski and their original Sinohawk partners. Quite aside from potential illegality, the objective of Hunter and the other Bidens was to support a profligate
3/ life style, by assisting a Chinese company (CEFC) in its acquisition of western assets through acquiring "prestige". CEFC lured the Bidens with a lure of equity participation to families of important politicians - more or less the same promise (but on a much larger scale)