dikgaj Profile picture
6 Nov, 15 tweets, 3 min read
1) I never liked analyzing political ldrs as usual discourse takes that fallacious shortcut to explain history. Most US presidents dont hv to offer much either - except the first few, Lincoln, Grant, the two Roosevelts. Trump is important to understand current US nationhood.
2) the US can be understood best as modern replica of the undercurrents of old Roman republic turned oligarchy where the original mafia system was invented. In short, its a tussle between "patriotic" mafia and "globalized" mafia. At the moment they are in unstable equilibrium.
3) Trumps difficulties were unavoidable - because of the very personal features that made him the ideal solution for "patriotic" mafia - his lack of embedding into the carefully trained political operatives groomed to continue the establishment networks of power and profit.
4) His disconnect from realpolitik (I dont think he was ever liked by the political establishment - he made his own support) even though he belonged to the same shark pool possibly stems from his comparative lack of personal depravity and kinks that permeate and binds the elite.
5) His disconnect from political class made him an ideal candidate for the "patriotic" mafia, who hoped he wd be less compromised than those in power to challenge the cozy quadrangular nexus between Han empire, west European elite, global mullahdom and US big-biz, esp finance.
6) Its that very "innocence" that wd attract a large portion of the "common" American - those not benefiting from affirmative actions of various kinds (more charities than to build capacity) and also what dooms him from lack of experience of how the establishment thinks& plans.
7) essentially Trump faced a perfect storm: he had given enough reasons to frighten all those he shdnt hv at one go. The strongest reason to fear him was his challenge to the global market allies of US "globalized" mafia in extraction and profiteering - China and West Europe.
8) Those big-biz/financier circuits that have funded the demo/mobilization against Trump, are not doing it out of any patriotic or lofty ideals - but they have decided its a low-cost investment to utilize minority grievances to unseat an obstacle and protect their super-profits.
9) Once the older political establishment retakes power, there will be a few "charity" and top-dressing but they will never go back to funding domestic manufacturing for several reasons: their interests lie overseas and they see much less risks in transnational financial play
10) domestic manufacturing will also empower the "patriotic" mafia, which the "globalized" mafia doesnt want. So for them, a bit of charity using revenue to keep the bulk just short of revolt while utilizing draconian control of society/labour in China or elsewhere is less risky.
11) this leaning towards more collaborative financial extraction from more ruthless societies and fearing the Untermenschen of one's own is possibly very similar to what might have marked the gradual retreat of western India between 8th-13th c.
12) Trump's removal and Harriden coming to power however cd very well be a very short term triumph. At the moment, I dont see the judiciary will support Trump. Portions of the establishment in both "right" and "left" hv come together against Trump for all the above reasons.
13) But all the forces who feared Trump have exposed themselves - primarily in their relentless agitprop on underestimating the support for Trump. Trump showed he had the support of about half the voting population regardless of whether there was electoral fraud.
14) The US establishment, big-biz nexus are not really interested in strengthening their commons too much - to be fair, like elite everywhere - but they used fringe grievances and will quickly throw them to the wind once in power. Issue will be resurgence of Hans& mullahs in US.
15) I dont see US "patriotic mafia" down and out. They will have to rethink and groom appropriate figureheads through politics - and train support base to take the consequences in stride. The medium term failures of Harriden admin will be there to see in spite of MSM blitz cover.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with dikgaj

dikgaj Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dikgaj

7 Nov
If not toned down by Biden, Harris will push for the following in foreign policy: (1) greater aggression& covert support to European anti-Russians, and Turkey against Russia - and more active interventions into Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, and against Armenia in favour of Azeris'.
(2) renewed covert support through Turkey to the Idlib zone and north-Syrian ISIS jihadis against Assad, (3) if European hesitation to move against Iran can be managed, then move against Iran - but no war that harms Sunni lobby connected to US establishment.
(3) war or proxy war on Iran can however be combined with Euro lobby pressure to get back into the nuclear deal so Harris may not have a full free hand here. (4) Renewed indirect support for Palestinian jihad will also be on cards. Again here more powerful interests will moderate
Read 9 tweets
7 Nov
The followup comments show why this tweet should not have singled her out rather than do the customary one for president after officially declared elected. She has already created the impression that encourages all scum scoundrel jihadis of the subcontinent to look up to her.
An aggressive "prosecutor" if allegedly "successful" is one whose character is to ramp up accusations without much conscience to drive bargains and if needed force acceptance of guilt where there shd be none. Same tactic cd be applied to India too to support Kashmiri jihad.
If there is an "Indian" connection, that connection should not have shamelessly ignored the plight of Hindus at the receiving end of jihad on the subcontinent, both in India and in neighbouring countries.
Read 4 tweets
5 Nov
Except the participation of the voter, as much as possible of the voting and counting process should be automated and freed from human intervention. The aim should be to remove as many of the middlemen including those that can manipulate any automated system.
absentee/postal paper voting with reliance on verification and counting by pre-appointed humans at counting end is possibly the worst situation for electoral process in large populations. While electronic voting is not full proof either, but can be made more secure.
Ideally voters shd hv the right to "retrieve": to actually see how and in whose favour their vote was counted. So that groups of voters favouring a candidate or item in a referendum can cross check through automated double blind process the total votes shown as cast on their name
Read 4 tweets
31 Oct
1) Ishaq writes on 7th c jihadi murder of poet & mom Asma accused of "blasphemy": "That was the first day Islam became powerful among B. Khatma; before that Muslims hid the fact. The day after she was killed the men of B. Khatma became Muslims because they saw the power of Islam"
2) Ishaq's story is consistently sought to be dismissed by Islamists as "weak" - one can see why: it openly acknowledges the mindset of the first Islamists and their acknowledgment that the conversions were by terror, at a level of sadism that wd numb and shock the target popn.
3)But Ishaq's story shd also make sense in the current debates over France beheadings: the violent agitation ag France is the same tactic as by Asma's Muslim assassin who taunted the children of his victim over their mothers corpse.
Read 11 tweets
30 Oct
1) The central issue in Samuel Paty's beheading is the demand by a section of Muslims for non-Muslims to accept claimed Muslim right to physically torture and liquidate the person whose words or creations are deemed offensive by Muslims. If we don't deal with this, we will fail.
2) Islamist practice of seeking to physically liquidate critical voices, especially "poets" of both gender who were deemed critical of Islam or its founder, is attested to from the earliest Islamic narratives. How Islamist commentators have dealt with these stories reveal a lot.
3) There are many cases, like Kaab of Yathrib (renamed as Medina to bury non-Islamic place name as in Islamist "conquests")- but we look at Asma bint Marwan, also of Yathrib - as she was a "mixed race" female poet who throws Islamist apologists in a tizzy from Bukhari's times.
Read 23 tweets
20 Oct
Darmanin calls "Collective against Islamophobia in France" as "enemy of the state": even without the drama, it supports our contention that "Islamophobia" activism actually encourages jihad & the Islamist demand for gagging all criticism.
bbc.com/news/world-eur…
All that the construction and activism on "Islamophobia" has done is to normatize the very aspects of Islamism that endangers non-Muslim societies: violent imposition of their values on others by throwing a blanket protection and justification of everything in Islam.
"Islmophobia" literature and activism among non-Muslims seek to paralyze societal and state counter-reaction to Islamist demands, while on the other hand it provides the arguments and claims with which Islamist organizations can expand and protect Islamist demands on non-Muslims.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!