Whenever I hear the political argument that, to win, we need to abandon this or that part of the state or country, I think about the people I've met all over Missouri, my time teaching, a speech of Dr. King's, and an older black man I heard in North St. Louis County.

1/
When Dr. King sat in a Birmingham jail cell in 1963, he spoke to the white guards. He listened to the guards’ criticism of the marches, their arguments supporting segregation. Dr. King talked to them “calmly,” he said, because they wanted to talk.

2/
When tempers were flaring throughout the country, in a place where one person was a prisoner and the other his state-empowered captor, these people from opposing sides sat down and talked. Eventually, the guards told Dr. King where they lived and how much they made.

3/
“And when those brothers told me what they were earning, I said, ‘Now, you know what? You ought to be marching with us. You're just as poor as Negroes.’ And I said, ‘You are put in the position of supporting your oppressor, because...

4/
...through prejudice and blindness, you fail to see that the same forces that oppress Negroes in American society oppress poor white people. And all you are living on is the satisfaction of your skin being white...

5/
...and the drum major instinct of thinking that you are somebody big because you are white. And you're so poor you can't send your children to school. You ought to be out here marching with every one of us every time we have a march.’"

6/
53 years later, I was in North St. Louis County for a Democratic township meeting. An older black man, who had been listening to speakers talk about how winning in Missouri meant needing to let rural Missouri go, raised his hand.

7/
He stood up and said, "I don't understand. The rural parts of the state have the same problems we do right here. Why can't we get all of these people together?"

There wasn't a good answer. The belief that it couldn't be done meant it never would.

8/
Months after, I was in Pemiscot County in the Bootheel, the poorest county in Missouri. I asked what the big issues in the area were.

9/
They said vacant and dilapidated homes, a struggling education system, ongoing segregation, and a lack of jobs and opportunity - the same things I'd heard teaching in North St. Louis City for over a decade.

10/
This was Dr. King's last effort: Bringing all of America together in a campaign to end poverty, to protect workers, to end inequity of opportunity. He was murdered because of it. And we as a country never finished the work.

11/
Now, in 2020, our national pundits call poor white people "working class" and poor minorities... well, not much, really, until that group comes in handy for election coverage or some other 24-7 media addiction.

12/
You don't win just by getting your person elected. You don't win by ignoring those with the least in favor of those who can fund you the most.

13/
You don't win by showing up once to a black neighborhood just to say you did, to tokenize a group of farmers because it looks quaint for the suburbs on a campaign video, to take money from minority communities but abandon them when it's time to do the work.

14/
We win by building the America we know we can be and that our children need it to be. That's real work. It takes sustained, hard effort. Years and years of it. Highlighting those who have already been doing it and getting them the support they need.

15/
I am sick to my stomach about what we've done to the People of Missouri, the divisions we have created, the refusal to stop perpetuating them, and our unconscionable failure to ensure we all have a voice in our government.

16/
This is our home.
We need to stand up for it.
We need to give and build local.
We can't wait for someone else to come and do it.

That's what it means to Take Back Missouri.

17/17

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elad Gross 🇺🇸

Elad Gross 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BigElad

5 Nov
I know Missouri Democrats are having the abortion conversation, some arguing that we need to accept candidates into the party who oppose abortion, some saying absolutely not.

I think we miss a fundamental part of the picture when this becomes the fight: The right to privacy.

1/
Missouri Democrats ran a candidate opposed to abortion in Jefferson County, who talked about his NRA A rating, and who defended the massive mask-less parties at the Lake. He lost by a lot.

That doesn't totally prove anything, but it's important to note.

2/
There are many folks in our state who oppose abortion personally. That doesn't necessarily mean they oppose our right to privacy. We need to be clear about what the conversation is, in my view.

3/
Read 18 tweets
25 Oct
I've been seeing some misinformation going around specifically about Amendment 3 in Missouri, especially coming from its politically-connected supporters.

Let's go through 7 of the claims.

1/
Claim 1: Clean Missouri in 2018 purposefully hid the fact that it was changing how we do redistricting in Missouri.

No. Clean Missouri's reforms to gerrymandering were pretty clear. Redistricting was the first bullet point: sos.mo.gov/elections/peti…

2/
That's not the case for Amendment 3. Amendment 3 purposefully buried its redistricting changes under two seemingly attractive bullet points.

Folks, the redistricting changes are worth well more to politicians than the $105 in ethics changes Amendment 3 offers.

3/
Read 30 tweets
21 Oct
I disagree.

Missouri, like every other state, and like the United States, counts every person. Representatives are supposed to be accessible to each one of us, regardless of our ability to vote.

That is the long-held principle behind counting everyone for redistricting.

1/
Amendment 3 runs counter to this American principle of representation. Instead of counting total population, it counts people on "the basis of one person, one vote."

It doesn't say "illegal immigrants can be excluded." The language is much more expansive.

2/
Amendment 3 grants wide powers to the government to decide who counts and who doesn't. You and some of your colleagues interpret it to mean that undocumented immigrants do not count.

What about documented ones? What in the language you used protects them?

Nothing.

3/
Read 8 tweets
19 Oct
The Republican operative working for the Governor and the statewide slate of Republicans has made a living cheating election law. He's purposely crass, he loves attention, and, despite being fined for breaking the law, is still employed.

stltoday.com/news/local/gov…

1/
He's promoted illegal gambling machines siphoning money from our education system.

He's helped corrupt our system with dark money.

He interfered in local St. Louis elections through an elaborate scheme, again using dark money.

riverfronttimes.com/newsblog/2019/…

2/
Now he's using vile terms when interacting with Missourians, but it's not new.

And through all of it, he has remained employed and has even been praised for his work:

missouri.gop/missouri-gop-e…

3/
Read 7 tweets
3 Sep
I've done some more digging into the McChrystal Group contract with Missouri.

From June 1 - July 31, we spent over $522,000 out of Missouri CARES Act funding. There's a bunch of hyphenated, fancy terms in the contract. Here's what we got:

1/
1) The COVID Fusion Cell, a forum to "increase transparency and accountability" in our government, bring together members of every state agency, and spotlight progress toward goals using charts and calendars

2/
2) The COVID Response Forum, another forum to talk about what happened at the other forum and provide "situational awareness"

3) Slide templates, action trackers, decision frameworks, priority action briefs, and a tracking and reporting system for COVID-19 testing

3/
Read 18 tweets
11 Aug
Missouri’s unelected Governor and unelected Attorney General are pushing to allow the Attorney General to take over many of the duties of the prosecutor of St. Louis City.

We need a plan to deal with homicides in Missouri. Throwing out our constitution ain’t it. #moleg

1/
From a capacity standpoint, the Attorney General can’t do this job. The office doesn’t prosecute many cases. So we’ll have to spend a bunch of money to add prosecutors to an office that wasn’t designed to do this work.

2/
Our Attorney General has almost no experience prosecuting. Your choice of a lawyer should not be based solely on advertisements, especially those in the form of short cable television fake tough-guy interviews.

His current efforts to reduce homicides have totally failed.

3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!