House, MD: 4chan edition
In which an anon makes a good diagnosis
In which an anon makes a good diagnosis
But THEN, plot twist! What if something ELSE is going on?
"He could have had surgery, but no cancer. They coul've just made the incision and called it a day."
"He could have had surgery, but no cancer. They coul've just made the incision and called it a day."
Another anon puts on his lab coat and frowns thoughtfully. Sure, this is PLAUSIBLE, but how would you PROVE it?
And then an administrator comes by to talk about how weird and, um, devil-worshippy? the board of directors is.
Listen, I didn't say it was a GOOD episode of House, MD. I said it was a 4chan episode.
So the standards of evidence, and ability to stay on target, are... special.
Listen, I didn't say it was a GOOD episode of House, MD. I said it was a 4chan episode.
So the standards of evidence, and ability to stay on target, are... special.
But this does illustrate that, from the earliest days, QAnon people *always* made strange, loose connections and caromed from idea to idea in an evidence-free atmosphere, while sometimes *nodding* to the idea that evidence might be, upon the whole, a good thing. Plus ça change...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
