I'm laughing at many of the responses to *that* thread. I did say I was a small and bitter man ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Predictably, many of the comments just repeat a bunch of myths. Which I'll run through now.
1. "Biden's only just scraped it!" Wrong.

The only reason they're still counting now is because so so many voted by mail. In normal circumstances - almost everyone voting in-person - we'd have known the result by Wednesday morning.
Biden's electoral college outcome is going to be 306-232. That is NOT 'only just scraping it'. Nor is the highest number of votes for any Presidential candidate in history (the previous record was in 2008); nor is a popular vote margin which will keep rising and hit 5m and above.
That's neither 'scraping it' nor a landslide. It's a comfortable victory. There's many many votes still to come in from California, New York and elsewhere which'll keep pushing the margin up.
2. "But the Democrats haven't won the Senate!" First, I bet many of those saying this don't realise how the Senate works, and how wildly unrepresentative it is. See the tweets here:



Second, we're heading for two special elections in Georgia on Jan 5.
That'll be 15 days before Biden is (we assume) sworn in, while Trump pursues a scorched earth strategy beyond belief, and with the pandemic likely to be causing absolutely unmitigated hell. This week alone, the US is recording record case numbers day after day.
So those two special elections will become, very simply:

"Do you want a functioning government able to do something about a pandemic which could otherwise kill millions?"

It's fairly obvious what the outcome of that will be - especially with Trump not interested.
Win those two seats, in a state where Democrats are more energised and better organised than arguably anywhere else in the country, and it's 50-50: with Kamala Harris as the casting vote.

3. The House. I agree: it's disappointing. Yet the Dems still comfortably control it.
In other words, they are two special election wins from controlling the Presidency, the Senate and the House. And people think that's some terrible outcome?!

4. Now, though, let's turn to Covid. On which the point is being missed spectacularly.
Here's a short Covid timeline.

- China discover it in December

- China lock down Wuhan in mid-January

- WHO declares it as Public Health Emergency on 30 January

- US does the same on 31 January

- Virus spreads across Asia and into Europe in February
- Massive stock market crash - unprecedented in how deep it is - in the week beginning... 24 February. During that week, I wrote a thread highlighting the enormous, ongoing impact that the pandemic would have.

The crash was the day the world changed. 5 days later, the South Carolina primary was held. The results of which were:

Biden 49%
Sanders 20%

*After* this rout, I was called an idiot for suggesting the same would happen on March 3: Super Tuesday. Yet it did, and then some.
On Super Tuesday, that voters were horribly concerned about the pandemic was pretty bloody obvious. So they chose a safe pair of hands - someone they could trust - and rejected something much more radical. Through massive turnout and massive margins all over the country.
I highlighted it as an important factor at the time.

All those calling me out for referring to tweets from the start of March appear to be saying that in a wildly unequal country with no affordable healthcare, they somehow couldn't foresee what Covid would do.
That is mad. It's incredible. But it was true of astonishing numbers of people.

Did you think a global pandemic would somehow magically disappear under the most incompetent President ever known? Did you think the biggest market crash since records began meant nothing?!
EVERYONE ALREADY KNEW ABOUT THE PANDEMIC.

Yet despite this, the same absolute nonsense was continually asserted. Despite Sanders now being obliterated in state after state after state: to a quite staggering extent in the very states people insisted would be his strength.
And as the pandemic spread, and Trump had no plan and remained in denial, as people slowly accepted that Sanders would not get the nomination, their viewpoint turned into:

"Biden's gonna get smashed! He has no chance!"
No chance? At a time of unparalleled economic disaster and a global health emergency under a leader who couldn't possibly be any less suited to it? Were you even living on the same planet?

I find this lack of vision utterly astonishing.
Exactly the same lack of vision insists:

- Starmer cannot possibly win back Red Wall voters (the polls suggest he's already doing so, significantly)

- Brexiteers will never vote for a Remainer. Despite Brexit leading to economic calamity and them losing their jobs and homes.
It also routinely ignores the economic catastrophe caused by Covid. Which apparently, people think will also just magically vanish.
And in September, BEFORE the chaos in the UK and while the government continued to bail the public out - before the shit hit the fan, in other words - amazingly, Starmer led Sunak as a 'capable leader' by 3 points.

I was astonished at that myself.
When (not if) he becomes Tory leader, Rishi's gonna have a frankly impossible task on his hands: which he's likely to respond to 100% wrongly, through even more cuts.

Anyone who thinks that somehow won't have an impact, a big one, is away with the fairies.
None of this is difficult. I'm not claiming to be some clairvoyant here. This is incredibly basic stuff.

The whole purpose of the thread was to ask people to view things through EVIDENCE. Not their political prisms. As things change, public opinion changes.
Yet there's people on this platform - well-meaning, all - who are like ostriches. Predicting that Biden would win wasn't hard. It was easy.

But when people keep insisting "Bernie would've won!" about someone who couldn't even break 25-30% among Democrats... just do the maths.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shaun Lawson

Shaun Lawson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shaunjlawson

7 Nov
In many ways, I am a small and bitter man. So I hope you can forgive me - everyone's a bit of an arse from time to time - but I'm gonna have a bit of fun.

This thread is about the epic number of political illiterates on this platform who insisted that Biden would lose.
I also want to make something clear before I begin. Everyone makes wrong calls. I have plenty of times. The problem is the constant dogma and ideology which lies behind calling it so wrong, ie.

"I'm a socialist. Biden is a centrist. Ergo, Biden will lose!"
Not only that, but:

"You are crazy / you are a disgrace for supporting Biden / thinking he'll win!"

That level of dogmatic tribalism is a massive problem on social media. But I hope those I highlight in this thread will at least think about it. Reflection is good for everyone.
Read 106 tweets
6 Nov
Yesterday, I explained the ridiculous set-up in the Senate: which has 2 seats for each state. There is a mounting chance that, after 2 special elections in Georgia on Jan 5, the Senate will be tied at 50-50.

We're also on track for Biden to win 25 states; Trump to win 25 states.
That's assuming that Pennsylvania and Nevada are confirmed Biden (which they will be for sure); Georgia is (pretty likely but not certain); and Arizona is (likely but not certain).

I'm not sure if any Presidential race ever has finished 25-25 in states. The Senate matches it.
Few things better sum up how incredibly polarised the US is now. But it's a false polarisation: because there's far, far, FAR more people in the 25 Democrat states than the 25 GOP ones.

Remember too that DC, the most liberal place in the whole US, doesn't have any senators.
Read 4 tweets
6 Nov
At this increasingly optimistic hour, here's a short thread reminding us about what we all face. The appalling threat which democracy everywhere will continue to face long into the future. A threat which will likely become ever more sophisticated; ever more dangerous.
Three anecdotes.

1. I teach many students. They're all smart, kind, decent people. On Tuesday, I asked one of them if she was following the US election. She said:

"Well, I don't know too much... but I've seen a video of Biden with children. He's a bad man".
2. On Wednesday morning, with me having been up almost all night following the results, I asked another student. He said:

"I've heard there's been lots of fraud".
Read 11 tweets
5 Nov
As we all wait, and wait, and wait, here's an article by @OwenJones84 . Which gets right to the heart of "where do the Democrats go now?" - and the constant, uh, lively debate on and off here between socialists, social democrats, liberals and centrists.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I like Owen a huge amount. He is an awesome campaigning journalist - and I agree with at least 90% of what he says on most things.

This isn't one of those times - but that doesn't make me blind to the factors leading to his conclusions. Not in any way.
Take a look at this graph. Which shows clearly and precisely what, above all, is destroying America.
Read 69 tweets
5 Nov
NEW: Kathy Boockvar, Pennsylvania secretary of state, has just told CNN that the winner of the state could be announced tonight.

There are still 550,000 ballots left to be processed, but officials are ahead of schedule and most will be counted by this evening, Boockvar said.
The key is Philadelphia, where there’s about 100,000 outstanding ballots and where Joe Biden is winning a whopping 80% of votes.

This means it may not matter that Allegany county, home to Pennsylvania’s second-largest city of Pittsburgh, has suspended counting until tomorrow.
Boockvar also said that Donald Trump’s legal appeal to discount mail-in ballots posted by 3 November, but which arrive before the end of Friday 6 November, would not make a significant difference as there’s only a few thousand.
Read 4 tweets
5 Nov
Increasingly strong chance that Biden's gonna sweep almost all remaining close states. In order of likelihood (from virtual cert to strong):

- Nevada
- Arizona (ignore Trump's smoke and mirrors)
- Georgia
- Pennsylvania

That'd give him 306 electoral votes. A very different look
Not only that, but the popular vote margin's gonna rise substantially:

1. In Georgia and especially Pennsylvania, where there are tons of Democrat votes still to come

2. In California, which is only at 66% reporting.

It makes the initial ridicule of pollsters look ridiculous.
I'm also watching the Senate races closely. Depending on how much early vote is still outstanding, initial pessimism there may end up proving (somewhat) misplaced.

In January, we might well be looking at two Georgian special elections which, if won by Dems, would make it 50-50.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!