A bit on people talking about the destruction of records and whether President Trump or his associates will do so over the next two months.
2/ The first thing to remember is that the federal government is very large and is essentially a document production machine. It’s simply not that easy to do, not and get everything. It’s also hard to do thoroughly without the assistance of career civil servants who are ...
3/ trained not to break the law and in this case have little incentive to do so. The second thing and perhaps even more important thing is this: most forms of executive branch wrongdoing either do not fit into or do not fit neatly into the four walls of federal criminal ...
4/ statutes. Probably some of the greatest betrayals and crimes are not actual crimes in a strict legal sense. Destruction of federal records is a straight up crime. There is no ambiguity. It is easily prosecuted. So yes, this could happen and it could conceivably hamper ...
5/ out ability to get the truth of what happened during the Trump years. But it would likely also be the easiest way for administration officials ... sorry, former administration officials to end up in jail.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Marshall

Josh Marshall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshtpm

9 Nov
President Trump's extended tantrum is a complicated thing to get a hold of. On the one hand it's basically criminal in any civic sense. I'm pretty confident it will result in at least some people getting killed - hopefully not many. It also leaves at least some of his ...
2/ opponents with some lingering fear that somehow he'll cheat the system and stay. And yet at the same time it has created a sort of schadenfreude time dilation event. Politics is a contact sport with a lot of heartache and jubilation at critical moments. Normally ...
3/ Trump's diehard opponents would have had one press conference or evening where they savored the reality of his defeat. But here, he basically keeps losing each day. His own furious impotence keeps driving headlong into the same wall each day we move forward.
Read 10 tweets
8 Nov
Oh dear. I was just checking out this new fusillade from Glenn Greenwald which I had heard announces that Donald Trump's presidency was far more lawful and benign than President Obama's. This seems entirely in character and provides some helpful context to his generally ...
2/ loyal defenses of Donald Trump. I will say this. Given the particulars of the blow up last month, someone really does need an editor pretty badly. But then I noticed there's actually a dig at me! I may have gotten under Glenn's skin.
3/ Image
Read 6 tweets
8 Nov
Let me explain something about this "faithless electors" issue because I keep getting asked about it. This is the idea that the election could be overturned by Trump convincing electors in the electoral college to switch their votes. This will absolutely not happen. Here's why.
2/ The electors aren't random people or government bureaucrats. Each candidate has a slate of electors in each state chosen by the candidate, by the campaign. These are hardcore party loyalists and hardcore supporters of the candidate. They're going to think it over again ...
3/ and cast their vote for Trump? I don't think so. One might as well imagine that members of Biden's own campaign leadership are going to vote for Trump. The whole idea is absurd. The only case where the 'faithless elector' issue can come up is if there's some staggering ...
Read 5 tweets
6 Nov
Here's the best way to understand what's happening with the network calls. Calls don't end elections. They help the public understand what happened. The usual standard is something roughly comparable to the "reasonable doubt" standard. Because they're scared of Trump ...
2/ they appear to have shifted to a "theoretical doubt" standard. Is it theoretically possible something could change. That's a high standard. And it is important to note that calls don't end the counting and obviously they shouldn't. They never do. But there is absolutely ...
3/ no doubt that the networks and the Associated Press are applying a different standard than has ever been applied to a presidential or any other election in the United States. He's won in multiple states that could individually secure his electoral college victory. It's over.
Read 4 tweets
6 Nov
What is worth noting is that President Trump doesn’t even have a legal claim, let alone a legitimate one. Their plan was to go to the Supreme Court to throw out mail in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received afterwards. That in itself was an egregious assault on ...
2/ the electoral process and one the corrupt SCOTUS majority was probably ready to go along with. But those haven’t even come into play. He’s lost without those even getting counted. His only argument seems to be a brief dispute over the number of feet election observers ...
3/ could get to the counting in PA. And that was already settled. There’s no single issue TPM has devoted more time to over twenty years than voting rights, phony “voter fraud” hysteria and voter suppression. Usually there’s at least a bogus angle to try to get into court.
Read 6 tweets
4 Nov
I will say it: I’ve always been addicted to polls. Long before rcp and nate and all the rest of them I was a polling addict. But I keep seeing people saying how there’s going to be a “reckoning” because pollsters and models were at least off to an extent in 2020.
2/ It’s not clear they’re actually wildly off. But who cares really? Obviously professional pollsters care. And if internal campaign polls are making big errors that’s a problem for campaigns. But I’m seeing it discussed as though it’s some big **political** problem.
3/ Or it’s even a problem with Democrats ability to appeal to rural America. But what does it really have to do with anything. I certainly like feeling like I have some sense of what’s going to happen on election night. But why does it matter? Why does it matter for winning ...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!