After Trump: first shots fired in battle for Republican party's future
Me thinks @GOP’s Step 1 must be the equivalent of l’Epuration in France or the Denazification process in Germany=exclusion of those who supported and enabled Trump. theguardian.com/us-news/2020/n…
“Trumpism will remain because he is such a wildly popular figure among their base. But, it’s always been pragmatic for many Republicans,” said Jason Stanley, professor of philosophy at Yale University & author of the bestseller How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them.
“There’s some portion of the Republican party supporting him mainly because he’s Trump, and he’s owning the libs and saying racist things. And then another group is supporting him because he’s pushing through the hardest-right policies.
“I expect the Republican party will prioritise whatever mechanism they need to dominate the courts, to keep suppressing the vote, to make sure that they can, as a minority party, remain in control of the levers of government.”
Stanley questioned the timing of those who appear to be breaking free from Trump by speaking out now.
“The Republican party has been doing this anti-democratic thing since well before Trump,” he said.
“They’ve been acting like the Democrats are not legitimate, and they have no responsibility to co-govern with the Democrats and their sole purpose is to get the Democrats out and rule as a minority party.
“We’ve had four years of this. When people do what is minimally expected that doesn’t mean you should be filled with praise for them … Norms have been so broken that we’re asking whether we should praise people when the president is obviously trying to rig & steal the election.”
It remains to be seen if more moderate senior Republicans who have been critical of Trump, such as Mitt Romney, senator for Utah, will hold sway when the party plots its course for the Biden presidency.
Other Republican figures are still on board the Trump train, even as it jumps the rails, including the fiercely loyal DeSantis, Cruz, Cotton, the South Carolina senator Lindsey Graham & apologists such as Newt Gingrich, former House speaker, and even the ridiculed Rudy Giuliani.
All have backed the president’s false claims of malfeasance publicly, overlooking the fact they were made without evidence.
“Those are the most dangerous politicians we have. They have placed zero value on democracy,” Stanley, the Yale professor, said.
“Some of them, like Tom Cotton and Ted Cruz, you know, might be more dangerous in various respects than Trump.”
In other words, Stanley, while comparing these @GOP members to fascists, as I come to think of them too, doesn’t think the @GOP has nearly enough (none bar one?!) « clean » members to undertake vital Denazification-like processes. Grim. Absolutely grim. But, sadly likely right...
Honestly @NobelPrize, please consider their achievement seriously for an award. Two aspects represent truly giant leaps for vaccine & drug development: 1) use of nucleic acids as a source of immunogen production; 2) safe parallelisation of aspects of development & clinical trials
1) is important because nucleic acid chemistry and enzymatic expansion are much easier and more predictable & reproducible than for conventional proteins, be they recombinant or inactivated virus. This means that once conversion of production lines is achieved, producing billions
The media (@Twitter, @Facebook & even @FoxNews) could help. They have begun to call out Trump’s lies in real time and cut off his press conferences, practices that should have started years ago. Let’s hope they continue to tag his lies and otherwise ignore him...
But the responsibility for healing America falls to all of us.
“We failed to protect our elderly. That’s really serious, and a failure for society as a whole,” health minister Lena Hallengren told Swedish Television.
“Belgian society has decided that the lives of these confined elderly counted much less than those of the so-called ‘actives’,” social scientist Geoffrey Pleyers wrote in Le Soir last month.
@wellcometrust@JonathanHeeney@JeremyFarrar@RidgeOnSunday@SophyRidgeSky Yey, while I agree that vaccine discovery, development, production and distribution have indeed progressed considerably in the last decade, I think it is fair to say there is still no such thing as rational vaccine design. It seems you agree since you explained that even for...
@wellcometrust@JonathanHeeney@JeremyFarrar@RidgeOnSunday@SophyRidgeSky a relatively simple, compact and not quickly antigenically changing virus such as COV19, we can not be sure to obtain a protective antigenic preparation in the near future. Even now, when we so desperately need it and litterally every lab with any expertise to this area has...