For all the absurd noise about "academic silencing" throughout the year, it's interesting to note that it hasn't appeared to have stopped anyone getting papers accepted, published, and cited hundreds of times
The Santa Clara serology study, whose authors claim at length and publicly that they have been silenced horribly, has been cited nearly 300 times!
If they're being silenced, it's not evident in the citation count. That's >1 citation a day
If they're being silenced, it's not evident in the citation count. That's >1 citation a day
I mean, most of the academics who talk about silencing have done so on massive media platforms and have carried that through to enormous academic acclaim
We're all scientists here. By what possible metrics have they been silenced?
We're all scientists here. By what possible metrics have they been silenced?
One thing that's been claimed is that the silencing has been of other people who have been terrified to agree with them. This is obviously false, so how have they been silenced? I'm really interested here
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
