This BBC article isn't even wrong:
"China sends 'world's first 6G' test satellite into orbit"
1. 6G doesn't exist yet as a standard.
2. Running an experiment on a satellite using terahertz frequency is just that.
3. Gell-Mann Amnesia effect.
bbc.com/news/av/world-….
"China sends 'world's first 6G' test satellite into orbit"
1. 6G doesn't exist yet as a standard.
2. Running an experiment on a satellite using terahertz frequency is just that.
3. Gell-Mann Amnesia effect.
bbc.com/news/av/world-….
6G will not be just a radio frequency as is the case with 5G. People tend to want a single number to represent something so with a G they focus on achievable speed. In the real world, using less electricity and better utilizing low and mid band spectrum should be core to 6G
The focus of 5G and 6G should be on creating more value. Faster downloads using ever higher frequencies, especially if they are available almost never, are not the core problem to be solved in wireless (eg, operators using less electricity is new value). sdxcentral.com/articles/opini…
Some of you may have trouble sleeping tonight given recent events.
You should consider reading: "Terahertz (THz) Wireless Systems for Space Applications" before you turn out your lights. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/… Your friend Tren is thinking about your well being!
You should consider reading: "Terahertz (THz) Wireless Systems for Space Applications" before you turn out your lights. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/… Your friend Tren is thinking about your well being!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
