I applaud @JoeBiden’s call for greater unity and civility in American politics. For many topics, this should reasonably be within reach.
Immigration: there is no reason whatsoever for Republicans to oppose LEGAL immigration, as the Trump administration has done. Our economy thrives when we have healthy immigration policies, and the election results show clearly that many immigrants vote GOP.
Middle East: There is no reason for Democrats to dismantle President Trump’s very successful pro-Israel policy in the Middle East. Eschatology does not require a pro-Israel posture, but common sense does.
Stimulus: If President-Elect Biden plans to impose COVID-19 restrictions that will hobble the economy, additional stimulus will be necessary.
Race relations: Things don’t have to be this tense. They haven’t always been. I’m hopeful a new administration will tone things down and take the microphone away from extremists.
But there are two other categories of issues: those for which unity is unlikely, and those for which unity is actually impossible.
LGBTQ issues: The fiction that a man becomes a woman because he says so is untenable. Even the majority of the people who kowtow to this do not actually believe it. They’ve just come to believe that it would be rude to affirm reality out loud.
I myself don’t go door-to-door to stage you’re-really-still-a-man interventions. But government initiatives to force people to affirm what they know is a lie are unhealthy and doomed to failure. Compromise is not possible on this. One view or the other must prevail.
I’d support going with the science. :-)
Also along these lines, @JoeBiden could help end the assault by the Left upon Christian social services. There’s something wicked about complaining that the Evangelical Right is stingy and meanspirited while simultaneously shuttering Christian foster care, adoption…
…and crisis pregnancy centers just because they are pro-life and pro-natural-marriage. If we Evangelicals don’t really care about people as alleged, then you shouldn’t need men with guns to keep us from being charitable to the neediest people among us, right?
And if we do really care about people, wouldn’t preventing us from helping those in need call into question your own priorities?
Abortion: let’s stop this nonsense by which people equivocate abortion with other perils families face. Only with abortion does the state sanction (or even fund!) killing an innocent person against her will, usually just because she’s inconvenient.
Opposition to this barbarity isn’t going away. @KamalaHarris’s efforts to put people in jail for telling the truth about #PlannedParenthoodSellsBabyParts are weak and futile. Unity is unlikely here.
Capitalism: I’m hopeful that @JoeBiden will stick to his guns against the socialist movement in his own party. Our country needs robust free-market capitalism coupled with strong personal generosity. Capitalism produces unequal improvement for everyone.
For example, capitalism has created an American society in which every street corner has someone with a smartphone and an Internet connection. This, not protest marches, has changed policing forever.
Capitalism lifts the lives of immigrants. It generates miraculous medical treatments for the sick. Generous capitalists help meet the needs of poor people in their own country and beyond.
If we care about people, we should prefer unequal improvement for everyone over the equally dismal outcomes produced by collectivism. There are no middle ways; there are only rest stops on the way to dismantling capitalism.
Religious Liberty: governments do not grant religious liberty because they are magnanimous; they do so because history teaches the impossibility of preventing people from living out the dictates of their faith.
There can be no compromise with those whose approach to the Constitution is to prioritize invented “rights” that are nowhere in the text of the Constitution over the rights clearly articulated in black and white in the First Amendment.
Let religious liberty extend to all Americans as it should.
If President-Elect @JoeBiden will lead in these areas of agreement and withdraw on these areas of contention, better days of harmony can come to our nation. This will require courage and tenacity on his part. I pray that he will have it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the experience of the Babylonian Captivity in the Old Testament, God chose, with no hesitation that I can detect, to reduce an entire nation and a house dedicated to Him to rubble in order to purify His people.
I'm a New Testament believer, not an Old Testament Israelite, and I'm not claiming that this set of historical events tells us anything about me or about us, but certainly it tells us this much about God: That His priorities are ordered in a fashion that undergirds that choice.
I didn't vote for President-Elect Biden—couldn't do so if given the opportunity in a hundred million elections—but I'm not convinced that this is the downfall of American civilization that way that some of my politically minded pastor-friends seem to think today.
Earlier today I received an email from a beloved church member that made me feel really, really good about my preaching (I'm trying to work through a big COVID email backlog right now).
It wasn't a, "Wow! You're a great preacher," email (although this dear saint would say that)
Instead, she very kindly said she couldn't tell what my view about the rapture was from my sermons through The Revelation. She was curious.
Maybe some of the rest of you at @fbcfarmersville have wondered the same thing.
For what it's worth, I am a Premillennialist who believes in a rapture before the Great Tribulation. What follows is an explanation of why that wasn't obvious to you.
This week the CDC recommended that the country adopt a new approach to bringing back to work people who have had COVID—moving from a test-based strategy to a symptom-based strategy.
They have done this because they have identified a subcategory of people who keep testing positive after they are no longer sick and no longer contagious—so-called “permanent positives.” These may test positive for as long as 90 days after recovery.
I believe that God often uses dissent in the SBC, and I think that some of the responses to @BaptistNetwork may represent some measure of a rush to judgment or an overreaction. But with that having been said…
I see two major differences between this group and the Conservative Resurgence.
First, with regard to the Conservative Resurgence, the identified problems were well documented. Southern Baptist professors did not believe in biblical inerrancy. Their published writings and recorded lectures said so. Their own statements said so, doublespeak notwithstanding.
This week @KSPrior announced her intention to vote third party in November. I completely understand. I did that in 2016. And I believe that she is 100% right to resist the accusation that she is "throwing away her vote" by doing so. That's a thin, thoughtless argument.
But I'm not where I was in 2016, and I thought perhaps it would be worthwhile to offer some public accounting for my change in thinking.
First, I reached a point of being glad that the candidate who received my vote was not elected. Third-party candidates simply aren't vetted the way that major-party candidates are. That's not a reason never to vote for one; it's a reason to discount enthusiasm for them.
@joelascol "This may be the most critical vote the SBC has taken on the race issue."
I don't think I agree with @pastordmack here, because other votes have been important. But this is a judgment call. I don't think this sentence is "stupid."
@joelascol@pastordmack "This vote will send a strong signal that Black leadership and Black professors aren't allowed to lead."
This would be an unprecedented action (we didn't even rescind resolutions that the liberals enacted before the CR) taken against the act of Curtis Woods and others.
@joelascol@pastordmack A lot of the associated rhetoric over the past several months has involved combing through the statements of people like @w_strickland and taking pains to interpret them in the worst sense possible and to select only the snippets vulnerable to such misconstrual.