There is a decent(for a British) exposition over caste - a rare good read on the topic.
1. Caste is not something unique to India. The sophistication of Indian society gives such a complex caste structure. Image
Don't believe a Literary Man. Image
And more importantly, don't believe a philologist. He will invent you stories out of thin air. The author aptly calls them Literary Fiend and Philological Crank. Image
Traditional genesis of Indian caste. Image
But note, this thesis is heavily drunk on the concept of Aryan Invasion Theory and hence, this structure is not applicable for South. What proof does he give? The numbers. Image
No Tamil and Malayali Kshatriyas, it seems. Wonder where did the king of Cochin come from. Or the Raja of Bekal. Even, the Telugu Rajus are not considered as Kshatriyas by others. Hence, there are no Kshatriyas in South. Image
And then, Vaisyas. The Telugu Komatis are not Vaisyas and hence, there are no Vaisyas in the South. Image
But, it's a matter of time their famed fantasy of Aryan Invasion Theory makes it's appearance. Image
And why a difference between North and South? By the way, do anyone know why Vindhyas is the limit and not Godavari, which is an even mightier barrier? Image
Now, when everyone is a Sudra, what's the point of having a caste split? And what is a caste split? Image
Because the imperialist is confused, he comes up with his own theories. What is actually fluidity of caste and caste hierarchy actually becomes lies and penchant for better social dignity. By the way, in a village with 99% Vellalars, who exactly is an upper caste? Image
Then he picks a village from the most impossible of geographies to frame his theories - Denkanikota. Professions are fine. But you don't pick something which is neither Telugu nor Kannada nor Tamil for your analysis. ImageImage
What's the basis for this? Brahmins tend to move towards cities and Muslims towards military establishments? Image
The segregation of society in the village. Again, if you look at it, this is not something distinct to India - language, religion, livelihood, geographical origins, those classified as outsiders and the outcastes. Image
The author tried to frame his theory on such a place and realizes his folly. He immediately shifts his geography to the hills of Salem, which is another outlier. And guess what? He falls into the trap of that "Literary Fiend". Image
These Malaiyalis follow endogamy. The children of one brother can't marry another - this clearly hints at alliance of castes and tribes and not of common origin. Image
But, there is another prominent thing in India. There is endogamy and there is a sub-exogamy. Inside your community, you can't marry certain sub-sects. Again, this is not unique to India. Image
Then comes the concept of affiliate castes. Image
Again, some nonsense. The author wants to identify this organization of villages with a caste but it is all too common everywhere. ImageImage
And how does societal influence matter in a discussion on caste? Naturally, everyone wants to look like his powerful or dominant neighbour but still maintain his distinctions. Image
So, what decides social structure?
1. Pride of Race
The point is fine but the thesis is nonsensical. Image
2. Pride of Blood Image
3. Law of Hypergamy: A woman marries someone better placed socially than herself. Image
4. Law of Endogamy: You marry only those like you Image
5. Law of Exogamy: You don't marry those who are like you. Here comes the concept of Kula and Gotra for Indians. Image
6. Now, I like this. The author introduces something called Brahminism, which is the culture of the Brahmin and which is derived from Buddhism and not the so-called Aryan Brahmin. Now, how does this fit into the fundamentals of caste, I have no clue. Image
7. Pollution: Which groups should be kept aside from the societal interactions? Notice, the author doesn't give foreign examples for this even though Cagots or Romani or treatment of Muslims and Christians by Hindus also fits the same pattern. Image
8. Jus Convivii - what does this mean? Customs of the clan? By the way, when did Pharaoh's Minister become a Diwan? Image
9. Trade Guilds: The need to transmit profession of the affiliated families. A cobbler marries a cobbler and a goldsmith, a goldsmith. Image
10. Religion
11. Language
12. Geography
These are self-explanatory - to avoid clash of customs. Image
Now, there are two other aspects - Dynamic View of Caste and Static View of Caste. Static View talks about what is a caste and how can you classify them, and Dynamic View talks about how the caste became what it is.
Coming to Static View. Caste is still fine. What is a sub caste? On what basis can you tag a person to a sub-caste? 1891 census gave a total of 25000-30000 castes with castes and sub-castes used interchangeably, synonyms used and stuff invented. Image
Consequently, a definition of caste came. What is it? It can be anything. Who can declare a caste authentically? Anyone who is competent to give an opinion. And who that one can be? Again, anyone. Image
Looks like this definition came from Risley. So, one can safely assume this is nonsense. ImageImage
Even the author of the thesis concurs 😀😀 Image
And the author goes to his favourites, the Malaiyalis. Image
And then he surrenders. He simply says, a caste is an "Endogamous Community". Image
The ultimate problem comes when you try to classify a huge, homogenous community called India which has a thousand ways of organization. Too many professions, too many societal equations and too many religions(Smarta and Lingayat can't be looked upon as same religion).
This is actually an unnecessary headache. Now, if you try to classify it, how do you do it? The oldest split the society into 68 groups and 7 classes. Image
And from inception, it's a mess. A prostitute and a priest are classed together, and a tribal involving in barter and the village treasurer are classed together. Image
When they entered into a quagmire from which they can't extract themselves, they created a bigger mess in 1901 - this one is based on social precedence based on perceptions and adherence to the Brahminical system, whatever it means. Image
So, what is the problem with all these? One size fits all. It is assumed that all castes are identical in genesis. Then the author comes up with something called Primary Formative Principle which groups castes based on their origins. Image
This is a good piece of work, but set in that colonialistic superior mould which treated Aryan Invasion Theory as a dogma. In reality, it's nothing more than a combination of Viking Raids, European Conquest of Americas and Siestema de Casta.
Now, under these cultural constraints, the author who has already decided South has only Brahmins and Sudras(plus outcastes) and no Vaisyas and Kshatriyas decides that there are only two groups in South - Brahmin and non-Brahmin. Image
Now, what is caste? An endogamous community with a tradition of common origin. What is caste group? Common nomenclature or occupation. Again, this is an absolute mess. And in order to strut around with a puffed chest over his creativity, you see some flowery nonsense. Image
My take? This is the most disingenuous comparison. A frog can't become a donkey but a soldier can become a farmer. And customs like Droit du Seigneur means a donkey can copulate with a frog. Simply put, you cannot make some stupid comparisons.
And then, he classifies them into eight orders. Now, the author is slipping. His Formative Whatever Principle is taking it's toll on him. No one creates a parasitic order or a societal outcaste for a start!! Image
Fine. You create a theory. But, where is the data to prove your theory, even bulveristically? Brahmins are the first road block as usual. Image
And then, he gives up. He doesn't attempt to classify any other Varna 🤣
Now, let's go to the Dynamic View of Caste - how a caste became what it is. Now, there are two different paths in the career of a caste - assimilation(copy from someone) and survival(maintenance your distinct identity).
Simply put, Assimilation is, "Be a Roman in Rome". It can be conscious or unconscious, it can be from lower castes or from upper castes. All sorts of influence are known to exist historically. Image
What are the kinds of Assimilation?
Affectation - it affects by social standing. Image
Appropriation - wrong choice of word, but doesn't explain why one would appropriate a custom. Besides, appropriation means prohibiting the original practitioner from practicing it. Are there any proper examples for this? Image
Adaptation - take a local custom/copy from neighbours subconsciously. Image
Intrusion - again, this is nonsense. One caste forces itself into the customs of another. No proper examples again. Image
Reversion - Revert back to your old lifestyle. Image
Sad to note, the quality of the article simply collapses when the author decides to create his own theory. There is much work to do on this, but he should have refrained from giving these comic examples.
Then he gives about how do you describe a caste. A set of questions - more of anthropological interest. I will share the complete set instead of trying to make sense out of those questions. ImageImage
And then, with a flourish, the author explains how you can put all this information to use. Break village panchayats and force everyone to follow British law. A damp squib of an ending for a decent article, eh? Image
Moral: The British did something which may be useful. But, the question to ask always is, why did they create it. The best example before you is Railways.
Link to the article. I will try to make an audio presentation out of it in a week or two.
Some Suggestions for the Study of Caste in South India - FJ Richards
archive.org/details/in.ern…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eztainutlacatl

Eztainutlacatl Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cbkwgl

11 Nov
There is this little girl whose father was the official priest of a deposed king. She spent all childhood more as a boy than a girl - sword fight, horde riding and all those. One day, she was asked as a wife for a heirless old Brahmin king. She gave birth to a posthumous child.
When negotiations were going on over adoption of a heir, the king died and the British refused to accept the adoption. She petitioned but to no avail. The dead king had a strange habit. Weekly once he used to dress like a woman and gave public audience.
People thought he was eccentric. Somehow, someone asked him the reason why he did that. He replied simply, my power is nothing more than that of a woman in a house. This is just my symbolic protest of that. Now, this kingdom had a great reputation as a knowledge centre.
Read 15 tweets
10 Nov
So, with Armenia, there is a problem - Orange Revolution. And Russia hates it. In two words, one can summarize it as, Russia lost the leverage on the talks table between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Forget all rhetoric. That's the fundamental problem. Image
Turkey always advocated for a resolution - you can't keep the pot simmering for ever!! That's exactly what Armenia did. Image
Was Azerbaijan correct? Legally, yes, but morally no. And after what it did to Armenian heritage in Nakchivan, a big no.
hyperallergic.com/482353/a-regim…
Read 14 tweets
6 Nov
If anyone takes a Mudra loan for crackers shop, with the sort of retrospective laws India comes up with, should banks be punished for granting loan to setup an illegal business? Besides, after years of normalisation, this Damocles Sword can't be ignored.
Sad to say, we are in a situation where criminalization of Hindu festivals and arrests for flimsy reasons is being normalized. Three more years, if people say they arrested him for bursting crackers, we won't outrage. We will be saying Usme kya nayi baat.
On the spur decisions like banning crackers while preparations for procurement takes months - how does it encourage Atmanirbhar Bharat and Ease of Doing Business? How many crackers manufacturers lost jobs because of this ban?
Read 13 tweets
3 Nov
One reason why Buddhism and Jainism failed as religions - they spent more time trying to troll Hinduism than attempting to create a solid religious corpus.
Forgot to take a screenshot of the previous image. A Buddhist translation of Gayatri Mantra. Image
Read 7 tweets
24 Oct
If I say Garba and all those, whatever their origins are, the only purpose people take a part of it is for community bonding and Hindu power projection?
It is a well attested observation that the collapse of Hindu Empires before Islam replaced Yagas with carnivals. A private affair involving a ceremony became a carnival where the king or whoever it is started the celebrations. It's not that they weren't there before (Prabhalu in
Andhra for example). In two words, religion hit the roads as a response to Islamic invasions. Were the people reveling in it pious? Were they really interested in puja or bhakti? Who cares, till the goal is to bring all Hindus onto the roads?
Read 7 tweets
24 Oct
Today is Mahanavami. The Goddess appeared as Mahishasura Mardini today. Let me collate how Goddess Bhadrakali of Warangal is depicted these nine days. Names, I am not completely sure, though.
1. Bala Tripura Sundari
2. Annapurna
3. Gayatri
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!