There is this little girl whose father was the official priest of a deposed king. She spent all childhood more as a boy than a girl - sword fight, horde riding and all those. One day, she was asked as a wife for a heirless old Brahmin king. She gave birth to a posthumous child.
When negotiations were going on over adoption of a heir, the king died and the British refused to accept the adoption. She petitioned but to no avail. The dead king had a strange habit. Weekly once he used to dress like a woman and gave public audience.
People thought he was eccentric. Somehow, someone asked him the reason why he did that. He replied simply, my power is nothing more than that of a woman in a house. This is just my symbolic protest of that. Now, this kingdom had a great reputation as a knowledge centre.
Every book in North India had a copy here. Now, it so happened that the queen had to rebel. The fort was put on siege and it eventually fell after a spirited resistance. Her friends tried to help her but the British were too hard for them.
When the inner fort fell, guess what the queen did? She didn't surrender. She cut her way through the main gate with 1500 chosen troops and the royal treasury amidst them. She marched off royally in the thick of the fight.
She rode non-stop for almost 150 miles before hitting safe ground. Not many know that she got into menses because of that rough exit and a long ride. Think of the physical hardship she had to go through. Now, the queen is gone and her kingdom is gone -
the frustrated occupiers literally looted everything - including door frames and utensils. One sad tale was that of an old Brahmin Notyagnihotri, who seeing these pillagers hid the bowl in which he keeps his fire. Someone noticed that and thinking he is hiding some treasure,
the soldier snatched the bowl and put his hand in, only to pull out a burning coal. The old man was bayoneted on the spot. It was an utter carnage. By the way, that library which the city was famous, it's the largest destruction of knowledge in India after Nalanda.
Now, the queen without a kingdom tried to hold her ground - she procured some armies, fought and was ultimately killed. She was in a hand-to-hand fight when she was killed. She killed many but outnumbered, ultimately fell when a sword chopped her cheek off.
Her men noticed her falling and before the British realised she fell, they carted off her body and cremated her. Her father was also a part of the 1500 troop when left the kingdom. He was injured in the melee and left in the direction of a different kingdom.
He took shelter with a small shopkeeper who tended to him. But, when he got to know who his guest was, he got scared and informed the authorities. He was brought back and hanged. What happened to her adopted son? He was a small boy.
The queen's men took care of him and when they were out of money, the boy surrendered to the British. Because he was still a small boy and he surrendered after the war was over, he was spared.
He was given a small pension and was ordered not to go near his kingdom, and not to use his surname. He took a new surname after his lost kingdom and his descendants still survive scattered all across West-Central India.
We still remember the queen for her bravery but we are unconcerned about what happened to her son. Is it because we are not interested or is it because he was deliberately erased from public memory?
So, with Armenia, there is a problem - Orange Revolution. And Russia hates it. In two words, one can summarize it as, Russia lost the leverage on the talks table between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Forget all rhetoric. That's the fundamental problem.
Turkey always advocated for a resolution - you can't keep the pot simmering for ever!! That's exactly what Armenia did.
Was Azerbaijan correct? Legally, yes, but morally no. And after what it did to Armenian heritage in Nakchivan, a big no. hyperallergic.com/482353/a-regim…
There is a decent(for a British) exposition over caste - a rare good read on the topic. 1. Caste is not something unique to India. The sophistication of Indian society gives such a complex caste structure.
Don't believe a Literary Man.
And more importantly, don't believe a philologist. He will invent you stories out of thin air. The author aptly calls them Literary Fiend and Philological Crank.
If anyone takes a Mudra loan for crackers shop, with the sort of retrospective laws India comes up with, should banks be punished for granting loan to setup an illegal business? Besides, after years of normalisation, this Damocles Sword can't be ignored.
Sad to say, we are in a situation where criminalization of Hindu festivals and arrests for flimsy reasons is being normalized. Three more years, if people say they arrested him for bursting crackers, we won't outrage. We will be saying Usme kya nayi baat.
On the spur decisions like banning crackers while preparations for procurement takes months - how does it encourage Atmanirbhar Bharat and Ease of Doing Business? How many crackers manufacturers lost jobs because of this ban?
One reason why Buddhism and Jainism failed as religions - they spent more time trying to troll Hinduism than attempting to create a solid religious corpus.
If I say Garba and all those, whatever their origins are, the only purpose people take a part of it is for community bonding and Hindu power projection?
It is a well attested observation that the collapse of Hindu Empires before Islam replaced Yagas with carnivals. A private affair involving a ceremony became a carnival where the king or whoever it is started the celebrations. It's not that they weren't there before (Prabhalu in
Andhra for example). In two words, religion hit the roads as a response to Islamic invasions. Were the people reveling in it pious? Were they really interested in puja or bhakti? Who cares, till the goal is to bring all Hindus onto the roads?
Today is Mahanavami. The Goddess appeared as Mahishasura Mardini today. Let me collate how Goddess Bhadrakali of Warangal is depicted these nine days. Names, I am not completely sure, though. 1. Bala Tripura Sundari