You’ve probably heard that pharmaceutical company @pfizer has announced that early analysis of its coronavirus vaccine suggests that the vaccine is more than 90% effective in preventing COVID-19. nytimes.com/2020/11/09/hea…
There has already been A LOT of speculation about the timing of the announcement and #Election2020. REMEMBER: speculation without evidence is how baseless conspiracy theories are born.
So, let’s stick to the facts: @pfizer is not a part of Operation Warp Speed, the federal effort to develop a vaccine. Kathrin Jansen, the head of vaccine research and development, said politics does not drive how Pfizer conducts itself. @nytimesnytimes.com/2020/11/09/hea…
Although @pfizer is not a part of Operation Warp Speed, it’s worth noting that they did sign a $1.95 billion contract with the federal government to deliver 100 million doses following the vaccine’s successful manufacture and approval. hhs.gov/about/news/202…
Keep in mind that the conversation around a COVID-19 vaccine is highly politicized. That means that politicians have a lot to gain from persuading you to think one way or another about the development and distribution of the vaccine.
If you want to stay informed about a potential coronavirus vaccine, make sure you’re reading AT LEAST 3-4 credible, unbiased sources. For accurate information on the safety of a vaccine, consult groups like @US_FDA and @CDCgov.
The development of an effective, safe coronavirus vaccine is exciting, but spreading vaccine misinformation can reduce people’s trust in the development process and likelihood that they’ll get the vaccine. Make sure you fact-check COVID-19 claims and #ThinkBeforeYouShare.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Searching for “We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics” brought up a bunch of results, including articles from @washingtonpost, @USATODAY and @nytimes.
@nytimes and @USATODAY reported that Biden’s campaign said he meant to describe efforts fighting voter suppression.
@washingtonpost included more of the interview, which showed Biden accusing Trump of suppressing votes.
Early this morning, @realDonaldTrump announced that he and @FLOTUS tested positive for COVID-19. Since then, there has been A LOT of speculation and reactions circulating. REMEMBER: this is a developing, breaking-news story. Here’s what to do and what NOT to do to follow it:
Read AT LEAST 3-4 reliable sources. When possible, seek out primary sources too. This includes updates from the @WhiteHouse or the @JoeBiden campaign on contact tracing. The more sources you read, the better you’ll understand the facts and the full scope of the story.
Avoid conjecture conversations or stories about the “what ifs.” Focus on the information we have right now and updates rooted in facts as they become available. Doom scrolling through nightmare scenarios will not be beneficial to you or the people who read the content you share.
If you didn’t fact-check this tweet from @JimDabakis, you might be a bit confused by the news that @MittRomney plans to vote on a Supreme Court nominee.
This tweet popped up hours after RBG died Friday. Did you question it using #medialiteracy?
There’s less than 50 days left until #Election2020 🗓️. In other words, you’re running out of time ⏳ to request your absentee ballot 🗳️ . Confused? You’re not alone. But worry not, we’re here to help! #MVP2020
🗳️ Check your local Supervisor of Elections website to (a) see if you’re eligible to vote absentee and (b) find out the deadline to request your ballot. ⚠️ HEADS UP ⚠️ EVERY STATE HAS DIFFERENT DEADLINES FOR REQUESTING BALLOTS ONLINE AND BY MAIL.
🗳️ 🗳️ Once you’ve requested and received your ballot, it’s time to vote 🗳️! Different states have different witness, notary, ID, and signature requirements for absentee ballots. Make sure you’ve fulfilled every requirement before you return your completed ballot.
Before you vote in #Election2020, you should know there are loads of distorted facts out there meant to sway your vote. If sorting facts from fiction feels impossible, then it’s time to try lateral reading. Check out this video and thread to see how it works 🧵👇 @SHEG_Stanford
To understand the information you’re reading, you need to put it in context. Start by diving into the internet rabbit hole 🐇 🕳️ and reading what different sources are saying. Open up multiple tabs so it’s easy to compare each source.
Search for keywords from the post and ask yourself, “Who shared this information and why?” Do they have something to gain from you spreading this information?
Today, MediaWise is proud to announce that we’re teaming up with nine other fact-checking organizations through @factchecknet to fight misinformation and disinformation this election season. 🗳️ poynter.org/ifcn/2020/poyn…
This partnership will bring together U.S.-based journalists and fact-checkers in a bilingual alliance to give voters 🗳️ the information they need to make their decisions based on facts, not fiction.
From now until Inauguration Day in 2021, we’ll be sharing our content with @TelemundoNews and @UniNoticias who will translate fact-checks before reposting them on their websites. All fact-checks will be available in English and Spanish through the #FactChat bot on @WhatsApp. 💬